My opinion on the cannons, for what little it's worth in a military-themed discussion, is that Sentinel would hardly have ended up with mobile horse artillery or whatever after centuries spent using land artillery as a static defense. Would they want lighter, more mobile pieces for field battles involving cannons about which I, at least, haven't heard anything, or would they want things that can shoot as far as possible, with as heavy a ball as possible to wreck any potential besiegers' siege equipment before they can bring Sentinel's wall down?
I agree with Squid; if it has to be Taneth and it has to be based on whatever from history, roll out the 1453s. Redguards with Napoleonic artillery assaulting a star-fort leaves a bad taste in my mouth and makes me feel like we've strayed too far from the spirit of TES maybe.
Also, wooly, I heard you like teleporting so we put a teleporter in your siege so you can teleport while you siege.
Completely agree.
Nailed it IB, that is exactly what I'm saying. <----- and by that I mean that I don't really care as long as we all have a good time RPing. It you guys have an issue, I'll change it if its reasonable, it won't make a difference to the overall plan.
I don't know how many times I have to present the reasoning, but from the time we see gunpowder in TES (exploding barrels in Redguard unless I'm mistaken) to the time of SoS actually excedes the time frame from the development of the most primitive cannons to the napoleonic era cannons in our timeline. The timeframe fits, and Sentinels use of them in naval warfare gives them ample reason to want to upgrade and develope newer forms of the weapon, especially since the running joke was that the cannons were so heavy that they sunk Sentinels ships. This gives them reason to develop smaller, lighter cannons even. Its not neccisarily how it could happen, but I can put ample reason behind the development supplemented with real life rate of advancement and reason within Sentinel's history to easily justify them. However, the advent of the Star Fort, again, is the direct result of the increased use of cannons in sieges and is designed to counteract that of the cannon ball.
The number of cannons are within the entire Yokudan Army, not deployed in the field. There weren't even close to that many at the Irk River and you guys continue to focus on the cannons when both story and I have constantly said CANNONS WILL NOT BE A FOCAL POINT. Next, no one insisted on bringing in these Napoleonic era cannons, they were listed and described in Story's army sheet, no one insisted, but none of you brought up an issue with it until it was brought in against your own forces. I'm fine with dumbing down the cannons if you guys feel like its too advantageous to us, as I've said multiple times and shown, Im more than willing to make concessions for the fairness of the RP, but it would be great if these things were brought up before the fighting starts instead of after.
I think the point is that, like Wooly said, war isn't fair. I'm well aware of what cannons would do to a flat wall, and thats the point. Realistically speaking, there wouldn't be advancements in wall defences until something was posed to force such rapid change. Even with ancient cannons flat walls were almost useless with the exception of Constantinople who's wall were the highest and thickest in Europe, and lets not forget they had a double wall on top of that. So since everyone thinks that were just gonna knock your walls down, we can turn cannons down to bombards if you want. Perfectly fine, I'll be sure to do some research on the era cannon and adapt the armorments to fit.
For the final and last freakin a time YOU GUYS ARE BLOWING THE CANNONS OUT OF PROPORTION AND MAKING A BIG DEAL OVER NOTHING.
EDIT: We've been extremely reasonable in adapting to your issues with our forces, and I've been a constant nagging voice about keeping things realistic and plausible for our side. I don't see where this idea comes from that we expect you to simply roll over because were all uber and stuff.
You are talking about frame of time, but that is completely irrelevant to us. And 19th century cannons weren't just "smaller and lighter." They were much more accurate and longer ranged.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombard_(weapon)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_de_12_Gribeauval
Compare. It personally doesn't bother me as much aside from feeling somewhat out of place. I mean i'm honestly thinking about putting the RP up now I just need to know what the points of disagreement were and what the answer will be.
@ Crimson, don't worry so much. We're suppose to not all know what each other is doing. It's rather more fun that way. Don't take it so seriously! No worries.