I see a lot of comments that seem to be said based on the perspective of laws we, as in the people who posted, use themselves. I'm not going to act like I know all about the "Old Ways," however, if what Ulfric did was a traditional way of challenging the High King, then what he did was fine. I mean challenging the "leader" to a duel is actually a common way traditionally war like civilizations go about things. So Ulfric is the bad guy because he called for a legitimate challenge, then killed the High King in a duel? How so? If you're going to lead a race of warriors, and nords are born warriors, you must be a warrior yourself. It wasn't murder, may have been one sided, but murder it was not. If you can't defend your throne from challengers you have no right to sit on it.