Unofficial "Will My PC run Fallout 4?" Thread #5 : Fallout 4

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:34 pm

See here too: ( i don't know your exact system, so that's a guess.)

http://imgur.com/q2flF9Y

A BIG <?> if you could run it at 800x600 !!!

-------------

Surprisingly, you can run Pro Evolution Soccer 2016 very well !!!

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:31 pm

Is has to be on 1080p... I ham using my 51" plasma TV for gaming... so lower resolution looks terrible...

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:03 pm

You will figure it out soon enough...http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?s=3db92946118f92e8b928dffc35ed8c50&&app=forums&module=extras§ion=legends#

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:08 pm

Hey all,

I7 3770 2.4GHz I believe

Corsair Vengeance DDR3 8 GB Ram

Asus GeForce GTX 770 TI 2GB

Im thinking that this will run on high settings. But I thought I would get some opinions.

Thanks

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:06 am

AMD FX 8350 4.2Ghz

8GB RAM 1600Mhz

AMD HD 6850 oc @ 800 / 1100mhz

Plenty of GBs in HDD.

Windows 8.1 64bit

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:29 pm

1080p high with some adjustments.

-------------

Also to notice: There is no GTX 770 <TI>. So i assume it's the ASUS GTX 770 DirectCU II 2GB OC

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:49 pm

I would try at 1600x900 (medium settings), and then you will see...

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:11 am

@Mark41

I just looked at the card again here is what it is.

ASUS GeForce GTX 750 TI 2 GB OC Edition

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:32 pm

Then i guess 1600x900 (medium settings) should be feasible

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:41 pm

Significant drop from a 770, but still good for medium settings i would think

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:29 am

Would I be okay on medium settings?

CPU: i5 2500k @ 4GHz

RAM: 16GB DDR3 1600MHz

GPU: 2x GTX 560 TI 1GB (SLI)

Resolution: 1920x1200

Comfortable FPS: 40-60

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:02 am

We'll see how well the game scales with SLI, but you should get at least medium settings. Your effective VRAM is only 1GB..not sure how well that will hold at your resolution. Most certainly worth trying out with your system though.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:06 am

Why only effective 1GB VRAM? Each of my cards has 1GB, sorry if the description was vague.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:48 pm

throwing in my specs i hope i will be able to play this game atleast at medium-high settings:

CPU : i5 2500k @ 3.3 Ghz turbo 3.7 Ghz

GPU : Asus Strix gtx 960 4GB

RAM : 8GB currently but can upgrade if need arises.

Resolution : 1600x900 its an old dell monitor.

i thought of upgrading to 1080p but i don't think its a good idea now system requirements are reaching to a ridiculous point now a days requiring 1500$ pc to play the games at high settings at 1080p or higher and i don't think 960 is capable to play the games at high settings at 1080p now. games are becoming too taxing even cartoony looking games like fallout 4.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:01 pm

Same as deadblood01, hope I'll be able to at least run it decently with the computer I bought early this year. Here are my specs:

CPU: AMD A-Series A10-7700K
Speed: 3.4 GHz

Cache: 4096 KB
RAM: 8 GB type DDR3

GPU: AMD Radeon 7

OS: Win 8.1 64bit

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance!

Edit:
Screen resolution: 1680 x 1050

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:50 am

VRAM is mirrored in SLI.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:40 am

Hi all,

I tried "can i run this"... But from past experience i know that most results are not really accurate

CPU: I7 4170K

Speed: 3.6 GHz

RAM: 16GB

GPU: Nvidia GTX 770

OS: Win 7

which experience could i get?

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:20 am

I did not know this! Makes me feel like a noob haha. Well my opinion of SLI has dropped quite a bit. Good thing my second graphics card was bought cheap. Judging by the gameplay we've seen so far, Bethesda is not pushing super high res textures so I might be okay.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:48 am

If at 1080p, I would be telling you you'd be running with at least high settings, but at 900p you should be hitting closer to "Ultra". The GTX 960 only came out this year and is a relatively strong card that Nvidia gimped with a 128bit memory bus. With your lower resolution, you shouldn't bump up against the GTX 960 weakness [...a relatively low memory bandwidth] ever.

Not sure what CPU you meant to type, but it is an i7 quad ...so good enough. I think the GTX 770 should be good enough for the High preset.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:13 am

Thanks for the feedback

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:54 am

Any thoughts on my setup and any thoughts on upgrades? Nothing is overclocked. Thanks!

Intel Core i5 3570K 3.40 GHz

ASUS P8Z77-V LX

16GB DDR3 1600MHz Corsair Vengeance Series

1x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB

600W Corsair GS

Windows 7 Home Premium (64-Bit Edition)

Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:53 am

I think the 660Ti will permit the important high settings mixed with some medium settings. I wouldn't buy another GPU until after running FO4 with the 660Ti. Everything else is good.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:30 pm

Thanks for the input! I'm definitely waiting to get a new gpu until I actually play F4 on my current system. I would like to play with everything on high but something close may work just fine. I'll have to check back later after everyone has a chance to play and see how it performs across the board. At least then I will know what to upgrade to if I upgrade at all.

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:47 am

Any thoughts on mine? I don't need ultra high settings but hope I'll be able to play it.

CPU: AMD A-Series A10-7700K
Speed: 3.4 GHz
Cache: 4096 KB
RAM: 8 GB type DDR3
GPU: AMD Radeon 7
OS: Win 8.1 64bit
Resolution: 1680 x 1050

» Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:40 am

With a nondescript R7 series I'm guessing is the graphics off the A10 APU, ...I'm guessing low or unplayable.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9287/the-amd-a10-7700k-and-amd-a6-7400k-cpu-review/3

If it not a mini-tower, you could get a new power supply and GPU. A Corsair CX500 and GTX 960 2GB or R9 280 3GB runs ~$200 if you lurk for sales.