Unofficial "Will My PC run Fallout 4?" Thread #5

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:41 pm

Unless your worrying about playing the PC versions of video games at 4K or 8K with the graphical settings set to Ultra or Ultra High, then the Nvidia GTX 970 is still a very capable and good video card for playing PC versions of video games at 1080P or even 720P resolutions.

User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:16 pm

Even if it's a little off topic, the GTX 970 is a top performer even at 4K with playable frame-rates (as long as the CPU can folow up) But you know that anyway... :wink:

User avatar
Emzy Baby!
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:02 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:25 am

At 720p your GPU will work nice with Fallout 4 as well. (a strong CPU will always help if your GPU can't keep up on demanding situations)

User avatar
bimsy
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:17 am

R9 280X

I5 4670K

12 GB DDR3

Plan on playing in 1080.

Should I expect high settings with some bumped to ultra?

User avatar
Alyesha Neufeld
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:45 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:01 pm

i really wonder when see wife hair is that call hairwork and only work on nvidia card?
so AMD or Nvidia they use is this video from e3 2015?

User avatar
{Richies Mommy}
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:40 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:13 am

Hi,

I am struggling to figure this out as i have no clue on CPU and can't see my graphics card on the list

My specs are

NVIDIA? GeForce? GTX 870M - 3.0GB DDR5

12GB RAM

INTEL I7-4710mq 2.50ghz 6MB

Thanks in Advance

User avatar
biiibi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:39 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:18 am

That hair movement looked like Havok physics to me. It was too much of a solid mass to be Hairworks, surely? Actually, tha surprised me a bit. It would make more sense for Bethesda to use Tressfx, as that's available on consoles and AMD GPU, whereas Hairworks is only available of Nvidia GPU. Maybe they use both, and the game uses whichever is appropriate for your card?

[edit]

Of course, Havok physics is available on all platforms regardless, so maybe they really do use that? I dunno... [/edit]

[edit 2]

Err... is Hairworks available on console? I'd thought not, and I can't find any links saying it definitely is but... does anyone know for sure? [/edit 2]

User avatar
My blood
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:09 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:33 pm

The closest desktop GPU to the 870m is the 660Ti spec-wise, but about 10-20% slower at stock give or take the game.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-870M.107792.0.html

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-660-Ti.110056.0.html

GPUz comparison: You see that you're in overclocking distance for the most part.

660Ti:

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/MSI-GeForce-GTX-660-Ti-GPU-Z.jpg

870m:

http://www.bettasplendens.de/uploaded/P177SM/GPUZ.jpg

Your CPU is basically the same one I'm using. Being hyperthreaded, it is closer to the recommended CPU over all, but it is slower an the i7 4790 by 0.5GHz and so you. You can overclock the 4710MQ 200MHz. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwiiGGHsrxA] It doesn't sound like a lot, but it will [most importantly] help bump up your minimum FPS in CPU heavy situations. Of course, you have to be mindful of the temps. I don't know what model you have. Is it Dell, MSI GTx0, Asus, Gigabyte or Sager?

The "brute force" of the 870m's 1344 core count, 3GB of VRAM and the level of cooperation between Nvidia and Bethesda makes me think that you should hit mostly high settings on the big basic ones like texture, draw distance and some ambient occlusion, etc ...but go light on the MSAA and Nvidia's Gameworks features.

User avatar
Bitter End
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:40 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:03 am

Your processor is fast and comes near the rec req.

As for your GPU well...it's almost between min and rec req.

I would say: 1600x900 (medium settings) should work.

User avatar
Jordyn Youngman
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:54 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:13 am

If you thing the rec. req. are for high or even ultra then near to that.

...and really difficult to tell, if you consider to play with some Gameworks features enabled or not.

User avatar
Add Me
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:21 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:34 pm

All my specs are good, 4GB GPU, 16GB RAM, just worried about my CPU:

Intel i7-4710MQ (8 cores) @ 2.5GHz

What do you think? :)

User avatar
Jason King
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:05 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:38 pm

CPU is near rec. req.

What's your GPU ??? (GTX 860M - 880M - 960M - 980M)

User avatar
Vickey Martinez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:47 am

My GPU is: AMD Radeon R9 M290X 4GB

User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:18 pm

You might need a third.
User avatar
OnlyDumazzapplyhere
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:43 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:09 pm

Thank you Buddy

User avatar
Leticia Hernandez
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:46 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:09 am

How about this laptop. MSI G 62 2QF Apache pro:
Intel core i7 - 5700 HQ 2.7 GHz (Hazwell)
16 GB Ram
1 TB hd
128 GB ssd
15.6 (1920x1080)
NVidia GTX 970M

I've watched some reviews but none mentioned Fallout 4. I'm hopeful. :)
User avatar
Sasha Brown
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:32 am

I have an Lenova ideapad z710 with the following specs

GeForce 840M

Intel Core i7-4710MQ 2.5

8.00 GB RAM

I know the gpu is not that good but it runs games like GTA V at high- very high with 1920x1080 as resolution.

Would it run Fallout 4 if it can run gta very well?

User avatar
adame
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:29 am

You'll be fine.

For a mobile quad, the i7 5700HQ [...a Broadwell CPU, not Haswell] is rather powerful. It actually beats the recommended i7 4790 in 3Dmark's Fire Strike Physics. The 970m is around a desktop GTX 770 in power and it overclocks well.

It's not a matter of if the FO4 settings will be high, but how high will the FO4 settings be.

User avatar
LADONA
 
Posts: 3290
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:52 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:26 am

See here some benchmarks !!!

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Computer-Games-on-Laptop-Graphics-Cards.13849.0.html?type=&sort=&deskornote=0&or=0&search=R9+M290X&month=&benchmark_values=&gpubenchmarks=0&professional=0&archive=1&dx=0&multiplegpus=0&showClassDescription=0&itemselect_5208=5208&condensed=0&showCount=0&showBars=0&showPercent=0&gameselect%5B%5D=346&gameselect%5B%5D=344&gameselect%5B%5D=342&gameselect%5B%5D=340&gameselect%5B%5D=336&gameselect%5B%5D=332&gameselect%5B%5D=334&gameselect%5B%5D=329&gameselect%5B%5D=324&gameselect%5B%5D=322&gameselect%5B%5D=316&gameselect%5B%5D=314&gameselect%5B%5D=312&gameselect%5B%5D=310&gameselect%5B%5D=308&gameselect%5B%5D=299&gameselect%5B%5D=297&gameselect%5B%5D=293&gameselect%5B%5D=279&gameselect%5B%5D=277&gameselect%5B%5D=263&gameselect%5B%5D=249&gameselect%5B%5D=225&gameselect%5B%5D=217&gameselect%5B%5D=214&gameselect%5B%5D=208&gameselect%5B%5D=204&gpu_fullname=1&codename=0&architecture=0&pixelshaders=0&vertexshaders=0&corespeed=0&shaderspeed=0&boostspeed=0&memoryspeed=0&memorybus=0&memorytype=0&directx=0&opengl=0&technology=0&daysold=0

User avatar
Devin Sluis
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:31 pm

CPU: rec req.

GPU: 23% below rec. req.

you could easily tweak the settings for 1080p (high settings)

User avatar
Mackenzie
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:18 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:17 am

You have a fast processor and a weak *GPU. (*64 bit)

I hope you can run it at 720p (settings unknown)

User avatar
Jesus Lopez
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:16 pm

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:36 am

wondering if i would be able to run on this macbook pro that i will likely bootcamp

MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Mid 2014)

Processor 3 GHz Intel Core i7

Memory 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

Graphics Intel Iris 1536 MB

it also has a 500gb flash storage thats about half full if it helps

User avatar
Hussnein Amin
 
Posts: 3557
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:15 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:09 am


I cant recommend anyone with an Intel Integrated graphics chipset to play this game, even the latest Iris versions. These are just not meant for gaming at all and id be surprised if you could run the game with anything more than bottom barrel settings.

The game cant even run the witcher 3 at lowest of lows:http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Iris-Graphics-6100.125591.0.html

Id expect the same here.
User avatar
scorpion972
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:20 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:48 am

My idea.... just wait...and try.... start up fallout 4.... go to settings....1920x1080p resolution...taking a look at the advanced settings... and decided how to set that part up... (mostly no AA at all)

User avatar
Bedford White
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:02 am

Yeah, and if it doesn't work at 1080p, lower the resolution...and so on and so forth.

User avatar
Alexis Acevedo
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:58 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout 4