Unofficial "Will My PC Run Skyrim" Discussion

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:13 pm

Hello um I am wonDering if my pc can Run Skyrim max pwn, can u reply some info that I know you have, Lol thanks!

CPU: i7 SB 2600K @ 4.6Ghz
RAM: 24Gb 1866 Corsair Vengeance Overclocked
Mobo: ASUS P67 PRO 6Gbps Overclocked
GPU: GTX580 WC / Overclocked Edition
PSU: Enermax Revo 85+ 1200w
HDD: 256Gb SSD @ 6Gbps, 128Gb SSD dedi for Steam, + 2 1Tb HDD's
SFX: ASUS Xonar Essence 7.1 card
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
2x 24" IPS HP2475w

iDk if can with nVidia stereoscopic 3D as well, updated drivers with above specs? My pc totally quiet even on BFBC2 on ultra dk if tat is bad thing or no please advice! Maybe working too hard or system too cool Not Sure
hopefully skyRim good on ultramax I slay dragons for the lulz should not go above 37c NZXT case keeps hot air out pwn h4x.
User avatar
FABIAN RUIZ
 
Posts: 3495
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:13 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:05 pm

Probably going to buy it on the 360 but curious on my rig

Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Processor: Intel® Core™2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.0GHz
Memory: 4096MB RAM

Video Card: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+


Why get it for Xbox? it'll run much better on your PC at medium/high settings at moderate resolutions.

Hello um I am wonDering if my pc can Run Skyrim max pwn, can u reply some info that I know you have, Lol thanks!

CPU: i7 SB 2600K @ 4.6Ghz
RAM: 24Gb 1866 Corsair Vengeance Overclocked
Mobo: ASUS P67 PRO 6Gbps Overclocked
GPU: GTX580 WC / Overclocked Edition
PSU: Enermax Revo 85+ 1200w
HDD: 256Gb SSD @ 6Gbps, 128Gb SSD dedi for Steam, + 2 1Tb HDD's
SFX: ASUS Xonar Essence 7.1 card
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
2x 24" IPS HP2475w

iDk if can with nVidia stereoscopic 3D as well, updated drivers with above specs? My pc totally quiet even on BFBC2 on ultra dk if tat is bad thing or no please advice! Maybe working too hard or system too cool Not Sure
hopefully skyRim good on ultramax I slay dragons for the lulz should not go above 37c NZXT case keeps hot air out pwn h4x.


Err, you'll max the game easily. You have an extremely high end PC lol.
User avatar
Sophie Payne
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:49 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:57 am

Windows 7 Premium 64-bit

Intel Core i7 3.4GHz (8 cores)

ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB dedicated graphics card

8 gigabytes of RAM

1920x1080 HD Samsung Monitor

please reply...? anybody...?


Probably high settings if not max. You will definitely be above medium anyway.
User avatar
Tanika O'Connell
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:34 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:41 pm

Windows 7 Premium 64-bit

Intel Core i7 3.4GHz (8 cores)

ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB dedicated graphics card

8 gigabytes of RAM

1920x1080 HD Samsung Monitor

please reply...? anybody...?


The HD5770 may have some difficulty @ 1080p due to the 128bit memory bus. I can't run The Witcher 2 and a few other games @ 1080p with my laptop [same card, lower clocks]. Everything else is great, so if you don't like the performance you're getting the GPU is the culprit.
User avatar
Soku Nyorah
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:17 pm

Err, you'll max the game easily. You have an extremely high end PC lol.


I think he was probably just trying to boast about his system.
User avatar
Amiee Kent
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:25 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:22 am

The HD5770 may have some difficulty @ 1080p due to the 128bit memory bus. I can't run The Witcher 2 and a few other games @ 1080p with my laptop [same card, lower clocks]. Everything else is great, so if you don't like the performance you're getting the GPU is the culprit.


Not sure if serious post of not. "You might not be able to max it because I couldnt max a different game with underclocking".


You are right though that his bottleknock is by far his GPU (as is the case with almost every system out there these days). The 5770 in my opinion will be bordering on max settings for Skyrim at 1080p and will certainly max it at sub 1080p resolutions.

These entire threads are speculation of course and we can only really judge for certain if its going to be able to run it better than an Xbox will.
User avatar
courtnay
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:49 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:16 pm

Not sure if serious post of not. "You might not be able to max it because I couldnt max a different game with underclocking".


You are right though that his bottleknock is by far his GPU (as is the case with almost every system out there these days). The 5770 in my opinion will be bordering on max settings for Skyrim at 1080p and will certainly max it at sub 1080p resolutions.

These entire threads are speculation of course and we can only really judge for certain if its going to be able to run it better than an Xbox will.


I run my laptop GPU just 50MHz under the stock HD5770. I run Witcher 2 fine [30+fps] @ 1600x900 max except for ubersampling, I even have AA enabled. When I move to 1080p I drop to a choppy ~20fps even w/o AA... The GPU just can't handle that game @ 1080p. So I was using The Witcher 2 as an example that the HD5770 can hit a limitation at high resolutions and large textures due to the memory bus.
User avatar
Nuno Castro
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:40 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:57 am

I run my laptop GPU just 50MHz under the stock HD5770. I run Witcher 2 fine [30+fps] @ 1600x900 max except for ubersampling, I even have AA enabled. When I move to 1080p I drop to a choppy ~20fps even w/o AA... The GPU just can't handle that game @ 1080p. So I was using The Witcher 2 as an example that the HD5770 can hit a limitation at high resolutions and large textures due to the memory bus.

The laptop version of the 5770 is not the same as the dekstop version of the 5770. It's about half of that.

http://www.amd.com/us/products/notebook/graphics/mobility-radeon-5000/mobility-radeon-5700-5600/Pages/mobility-radeon-5700-5600.aspx#2
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/ati-radeon-hd-5000/hd-5770/Pages/ati-radeon-hd-5770-overview.aspx#2
User avatar
STEVI INQUE
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:06 pm

The laptop version of the 5770 is not the same as the dekstop version of the 5770. It's about half of that.

http://www.amd.com/us/products/notebook/graphics/mobility-radeon-5000/mobility-radeon-5700-5600/Pages/mobility-radeon-5700-5600.aspx#2
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/ati-radeon-hd-5000/hd-5770/Pages/ati-radeon-hd-5770-overview.aspx#2


I already did the conversion, my laptop GPU is the Mobility HD5870... which is the same chip as the HD5770.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5870.23073.0.html

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870

The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is a high-end DirectX 11 capable graphics card for laptops / notebooks by AMD. At the time of announcement (Jan 2010) the 5870 paired with GDDR5 memory should be the fastest laptop GPU (except SLI / CF) available. Technically, the chip is based on the desktop Radeon HD 5770 (RV840) with a slower clock rate.

The memory interface of the Mobility 5870 is composed out of two 64 bit wide controllers leading to a 128 bit memory bus that can access up to 1024 MB of DDR3 or GDDR5 memory (512 MB GDDR3). If (G)DDR3 is used by the laptop vendor the performance clearly suffers noticable.

The HD5870 offers 800 MADD cores (called Stream Processors) which are grouped in 160 5-dimensional groups. The cores support DirectX 11 functions in hardware (Tessellation, OIT, Post-Processing, Shadows, HDR Texture Compression). Furthermore, 16 ROPs, 40TMUs, and 40 TAUs can be found on the chip. All in all 1040 Mio transistors offer a theroretic computation power of up to 1.12 TFLOPS. ....

Manufacturer ATI
Mobility Radeon HD 5870 800@700MHz
Codename Broadway-XT
Pipelines 800 - unified
technology 40 nm


http://www.gpureview.com/Radeon-HD-5770-card-615.html

Memory Type: GDDR5
Memory Bus Type: 64x2 (128 bit)
DirectX Compliance: 11.0
OpenGL Compliance: 3.2
PS/VS Version: 5.0/5.0
Process: 40 nm
Fragment Pipelines: 800
Vertex Pipelines: 0
Texture Units: 40
Raster Operators 16

User avatar
matt oneil
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:13 pm

I don't have a motherboard yet. :P

@TheFBI

Are you sure? I beleive that they will do the job the same but are Intel actually all around better? Whats the difference?

Someone answer the annoying bosmer's question.


AMD and intel have different perks, from a purely technical standpoint, intel makes the better chip, however, intel makes one trick ponies for socket sets. you're probably not going to see a lot of affordable upgradability from Intel.

Where as if you buy an AMD 990 board and the 1100t BE, you get a chip that will do everything great just now, and then in a few months you can upgrade to their new awesomeness, and only have to upgrade the CPU.

Typically with intel when they make a new awesome chip to replace their old awesome chip it either costs over $600, or you have to buy a new motherboard to support it.

Edit:

I should also note that AMD's SLi drivers aren't solid yet so if you DO want to do a dual-card solution on an AMD board, go with an AMD card. Also because ATI cards also offer better bang for the buck IMO
User avatar
J.P loves
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:15 pm

The HD5770 may have some difficulty @ 1080p due to the 128bit memory bus. I can't run The Witcher 2 and a few other games @ 1080p with my laptop [same card, lower clocks]. Everything else is great, so if you don't like the performance you're getting the GPU is the culprit.


I could run Witcher 2 with little trouble with a 5770 at 1080p, but then that game seemed very well optimized.

Also i really doubt Skyrim will be as graphically demanding as The Witcher 2.
User avatar
Skrapp Stephens
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:04 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:19 am

AMD and intel have different perks, from a purely technical standpoint, intel makes the better chip, however, intel makes one trick ponies for socket sets. you're probably not going to see a lot of affordable upgradability from Intel.

Where as if you buy an AMD 990 board and the 1100t BE, you get a chip that will do everything great just now, and then in a few months you can upgrade to their new awesomeness, and only have to upgrade the CPU.

Typically with intel when they make a new awesome chip to replace their old awesome chip it either costs over $600, or you have to buy a new motherboard to support it.

Edit:

I should also note that AMD's SLi drivers aren't solid yet so if you DO want to do a dual-card solution on an AMD board, go with an AMD card. Also because ATI cards also offer better bang for the buck IMO


When I bought my desktop in May of 2008, I picked up a Q9450 that I now have a small overclock on... a bit over Q9650 speed. It is now over three years old and can keep up with the AMD X6s for gaming. I have another 2-3 years of decent gaming ahead of me.

...the point is, if you buy a decent Intel CPU like the 2500k and a mobo with all the features you might need [USB3, SATA3, SLI & Crossfire capability], then you won't need to worry about an upgrade path or paying for them. I planned my rig around not needing to upgrade anything but the GPU and now I'll likely not need another thing until my next build 2-3 years from now.
User avatar
Pixie
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:37 am

I ran Oblivion, Fallout 3, and Fallout: New Vegas fairly well at Max Settings on 1680x1050 resolution with the rig in my signature. I got a fair bit of stutter in Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas, but I attributed that to fact that the SLI setup couldn't keep up with the max textures + AA (I read a GTX 260 ran the games without a problem).

That being said, due to all the new games coming out near the end of the year and in Q1 2013 I plan on doing an upgrade on my rig with the following.

CPU: I5 2500k
GPU: Nvidia GTX 570
RAM: 8GB (is there any point in having 16GB for gaming?)

Obviously my planned upgrades will be more than enough to run Skyrim, however, how will my current rig do? I may not be able to upgrade everything by the time Skyrim is released and I'd like to be able to play the game as soon as it comes out ^_^
User avatar
Lexy Dick
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:15 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:39 am

I ran Oblivion, Fallout 3, and Fallout: New Vegas fairly well at Max Settings on 1680x1050 resolution with the rig in my signature. I got a fair bit of stutter in Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas, but I attributed that to fact that the SLI setup couldn't keep up with the max textures + AA (I read a GTX 260 ran the games without a problem).

That being said, due to all the new games coming out near the end of the year and in Q1 2013 I plan on doing an upgrade on my rig with the following.

CPU: I5 2500k
GPU: Nvidia GTX 570
RAM: 8GB (is there any point in having 16GB for gaming?)

Obviously my planned upgrades will be more than enough to run Skyrim, however, how will my current rig do? I may not be able to upgrade everything by the time Skyrim is released and I'd like to be able to play the game as soon as it comes out ^_^


I'd go with just a GPU upgrade. A Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz should be more than enough CPU power for a good single card.
User avatar
des lynam
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:07 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:26 pm

I ran Oblivion, Fallout 3, and Fallout: New Vegas fairly well at Max Settings on 1680x1050 resolution with the rig in my signature. I got a fair bit of stutter in Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas, but I attributed that to fact that the SLI setup couldn't keep up with the max textures + AA (I read a GTX 260 ran the games without a problem).

That being said, due to all the new games coming out near the end of the year and in Q1 2013 I plan on doing an upgrade on my rig with the following.

CPU: I5 2500k
GPU: Nvidia GTX 570
RAM: 8GB (is there any point in having 16GB for gaming?)

Obviously my planned upgrades will be more than enough to run Skyrim, however, how will my current rig do? I may not be able to upgrade everything by the time Skyrim is released and I'd like to be able to play the game as soon as it comes out ^_^


I'd go with just a GPU upgrade. A Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz should be more than enough CPU power for a good single card.
User avatar
Hannah Whitlock
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:21 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:17 pm

The HD5770 may have some difficulty @ 1080p due to the 128bit memory bus. I can't run The Witcher 2 and a few other games @ 1080p with my laptop [same card, lower clocks]. Everything else is great, so if you don't like the performance you're getting the GPU is the culprit.

Um...I can play any visually demanding game at that resolution with my 5770 and they all run silky smooth.

EDIT:The ATI Mobility cards aren't the same. They're about half the power. So yeah, I'm thinking I'll get on max.
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:47 am

i5 2500k @3.3Ghz
GTX 570
RAM 8G
Window 7 Home 64bit
Resolution 1600x900

this spec can run 60fps with max setting?
User avatar
stephanie eastwood
 
Posts: 3526
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:11 pm

i5 2500k @3.3Ghz
GTX 570
RAM 8G
Window 7 Home 64bit
Resolution 1600x900

this spec can run 60fps with max setting?

medium-high, maybe more
User avatar
Soku Nyorah
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:42 am

medium-high, maybe more


Eh? He'll max it no problem.
User avatar
yessenia hermosillo
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:02 pm

medium-high, maybe more


He should easily be able to run it on max with that system.
User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:19 pm

He should easily be able to run it on max with that system.

Ok ok sorry
User avatar
Lloyd Muldowney
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:08 am

i5 2500k @3.3Ghz
GTX 570
RAM 8G
Window 7 Home 64bit
Resolution 1600x900

this spec can run 60fps with max setting?



That′s my computer thief xD

It will destroy skyrim trust me, and if you have a 1080p display you will still max it at 60 fps.
User avatar
Josh Lozier
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:20 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:18 pm

medium-high, maybe more


http://www.geforce.com/Hardware/GPUs/geforce-gtx-570/performance/Witcher-2-The-Assassins-of-Kings-NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-570-OPS

Yeah, he won′t be able to max skyrim ... :sadvaultboy:

The recommended card is a gtx 460...
User avatar
Quick draw II
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:11 pm

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:42 pm

will this do?

Processor Intel? Core? i5-650 Processor
- 3.20 GHz
RAM - 4 GB
- DDR3
- 1333 MHz
Graphics card NVIDIA? GeForce? GT 320
- up to 2815 MB total available graphics memory, with 1 GB dedicated
Hard drive 1 TB, 7200 RPM
User avatar
Charles Mckinna
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:58 pm

http://www.geforce.com/Hardware/GPUs/geforce-gtx-570/performance/Witcher-2-The-Assassins-of-Kings-NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-570-OPS


Is there a site like that for AMD cards?
User avatar
sw1ss
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:02 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim