Unofficial "Will My PC Run Skyrim" Discussion #25

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am

Does Skyrim use more than 2 cores if availible? Any info on that?

Im asking because I need to decide whether to get a Intel i5-2400 or i3-2100 Cpu ...
User avatar
Shae Munro
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:28 pm

What graphics card is better for Skyrim ( full HD resolution & max settings ): HD6950 or GTX570?


The GTX 570 is faster then the ATI 6950. A ATI 6970 would be on par with the GTX 570. All of thoughs cards will max Skyrim easily though.

Does Skyrim use more than 2 cores if availible? Any info on that?

Im asking because I need to decide whether to get a Intel i5-2400 or i3-2100 Cpu ...

We are unsure if Skyrim will be Quad Core optimized yet. Either way It certainly won't hurt you, so I'd go for the i5-2400 (assuming the 2500k is out of you budget). Also their are other games out their that take full advantage of Quad Cores like BF, so if you play other games that would also be helpful and you'd future proof a lot more.
User avatar
stevie trent
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:32 pm

What graphics card is better for Skyrim ( full HD resolution & max settings ): HD6950 or GTX570?

The GTX 570 is faster then the ATI 6950. A ATI 6970 would be on par with the GTX 570. All of thoughs cards will max Skyrim easily though.

Greg49 is correct, the 570 is indeed faster than the 6950 and more comparable in benchmarks to the 6970.

Just be sure if you are thinking about picking up the 6950 to unlock to 6970 speeds, that you make sure that your 6950 is indeed unlockable. Manufacturers removed this feature due to people unlocking, but there are still some floating out there.
User avatar
Emzy Baby!
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:02 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:25 pm


We are unsure if Skyrim will be Quad Core optimized yet. Either way It certainly won't hurt you, so I'd go for the i5-2400 (assuming the 2500k is out of you budget). Also their are other games out their that take full advantage of Quad Cores like BF, so if you play other games that would also be helpful and you'd future proof a lot more.


Thanks, so I think Ill go with the 2400, although its 50€ more expensive. 2500k is another 20€ more, but from what I read in tests, it doesn't seem to make that much a difference. Or should I instead invest this into a better graphics card?

I was thinking of getting the MSI GTX 560 Ti, because it is said to be very good in cost/effectiveness and it is listed here under being playable at max. settings. Should I buy it or instead invest some more money for a HD 6950 (20€ more) or even a GTX 570 (100€ more)?

I definetly want to be able to play this game at max. settings.
User avatar
Dark Mogul
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:51 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:47 am

What about a Intel Quad Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU?

I already have a GeForce GTX 465, which allows ultra settings.
User avatar
STEVI INQUE
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:23 am

Thanks, so I think Ill go with the 2400, although its 50€ more expensive. 2500k is another 20€ more, but from what I read in tests, it doesn't seem to make that much a difference. Or should I instead invest this into a better graphics card?

I was thinking of getting the MSI GTX 560 Ti, because it is said to be very good in cost/effectiveness and it is listed here under being playable at max. settings. Should I buy it or instead invest some more money for a HD 6950 (20€ more) or even a GTX 570 (100€ more)?

I definetly want to be able to play this game at max. settings.


Any of thoughs cards will breeze right through Skyrim and are all great choices. Just at least go for the 2400, but if you can fit in the 2500k that be even better because you OC it easily and will add even more future proof to your build.

What about a Intel Quad Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU?

I already have a GeForce GTX 465, which allows ultra settings.


The 2600 will be more than enough for Skyrim.
User avatar
Baby K(:
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:07 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:17 pm

I found this on Craigslist for $450. The person who is selling it claims it can run Crysis on high. Is it worth it?

AMD Phenom II 955 Quad Core CPU @ 3.4Ghz
6GB Corsair DDR3 RAM
XFX ATi Radeon 5770 HD Video Card
640GB hard drive partitioned to 60GB for fastest possible bootable drive (7.2K RPM)
Additional 120GB 7.2KRPM Media Drive
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MS Office 2007
User avatar
Da Missz
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:42 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:54 pm

Just got this new desktop from :bowdown: pcspecialist cost more than my car is worth :shakehead: i think it will max Skyrim but what do you guys think?
here are the specs

Intel? Core?i7 Processor Extreme Edition i7-990X (3.46GHz) 6.4GTs/12MB Cache
12GB KINGSTON HYPER-X TRI-DDR3 1600MHz, X.M.P (3 x 4GB KIT)
3GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 580 - 2 DVI, HDMI, DP - 3D Vision Ready (3 of these)
2TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD2002FAEX, SATA 6 Gb/s, 64MB CACHE (7200rpm) (2 of these)
ASUS VG236HE 23" 120Hz 3D LCD, HDMI/DVI-D HD, 1920x1080 (2 of these )
NVIDIA 3D "goggles"
ASUS? RAMPAGE III EXTREME: 3-Way SLI & CrossFireX, SATA 6.0GB/s, USB 3.0

those are the most important specs I think.
so will it do the job well?
User avatar
Courtney Foren
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:49 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:25 am

Just got this new desktop from :bowdown: pcspecialist cost more than my car is worth :shakehead: i think it will max Skyrim but what do you guys think?
here are the specs

Intel? Core?i7 Processor Extreme Edition i7-990X (3.46GHz) 6.4GTs/12MB Cache
12GB KINGSTON HYPER-X TRI-DDR3 1600MHz, X.M.P (3 x 4GB KIT)
3GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 580 - 2 DVI, HDMI, DP - 3D Vision Ready (3 of these)
2TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD2002FAEX, SATA 6 Gb/s, 64MB CACHE (7200rpm) (2 of these)
ASUS VG236HE 23" 120Hz 3D LCD, HDMI/DVI-D HD, 1920x1080 (2 of these )
NVIDIA 3D "goggles"
ASUS? RAMPAGE III EXTREME: 3-Way SLI & CrossFireX, SATA 6.0GB/s, USB 3.0

those are the most important specs I think.
so will it do the job well?


With ease.
User avatar
JLG
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:42 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:20 am

Not sure i said it, but thanks for the replys in the previous thread.


Just bought a new 23" monitor today so i can enjoy the game fully :)
User avatar
Heather beauchamp
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:05 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:52 pm

With ease.

thanks! it plays crysis 2 on max but Skyrim is in a league of its own or at least thats what ive been told.
User avatar
Matt Bee
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:32 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:40 pm

by the way will skyrim support 3D graphics cards?
User avatar
leigh stewart
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:59 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:44 pm

I'm assuming no, but I'm posting here just to be sure. Is there any chance that my pc can run Skyrim at all?
Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz
2GB RAM
Nvidia GeForce 7800GTX
User avatar
jaideep singh
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:45 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:31 pm

Does Skyrim use more than 2 cores if availible? Any info on that?
It's an over hauled engine not a new engine, from my understanding the engine will not make use of quad cores, unless someone can confirm differently the game engine is still single threaded.
User avatar
Emma-Jane Merrin
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:52 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:00 pm

Guys, what goes under the catagory of Good FPS? (Frames Per Second, not First Person Shooter. Just to clear that up :biggrin: ) And what is considered as bad?

Also, do you guys know when the official requriments will be released?
User avatar
Thomas LEON
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:01 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:00 am

Guys, what goes under the catagory of Good FPS? (Frames Per Second, not First Person Shooter. Just to clear that up :biggrin: ) And what is considered as bad?

Also, do you guys know when the official requriments will be released?


Depends on the game and I heard in about 3 weeks.

EDIT: Also depends on how well you can tolerate FPS.
User avatar
patricia kris
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:27 pm

Guys, what goes under the catagory of Good FPS? (Frames Per Second, not First Person Shooter. Just to clear that up :biggrin: ) And what is considered as bad?
Anything playable, for me personally that's 25fps and up, anything below that makes combat a real chore.
User avatar
Susan
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:40 am

Depends on the game and I heard in about 3 weeks.

EDIT: Also depends on how well you can tolerate FPS.

Ahh, alright, more a matter of personal tolerance then. I think what Runningbare said seems logical. to me atleast.
User avatar
Trevor Bostwick
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:51 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:50 am

Any of thoughs cards will breeze right through Skyrim and are all great choices.


Cool, then I think I'll go with the 560 Ti, but could I also max it out with 1080p resolution, cause Im thinking of getting a 24" monitor?

Just at least go for the 2400, but if you can fit in the 2500k that be even better because you OC it easily and will add even more future proof to your build.


Should I invest 20€ rather into the i5-2500k instead of i5-2400 or a better graphics card (HD6850)?
User avatar
keri seymour
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:09 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:19 am

Cool, then I think I'll go with the 560 Ti, but could I also max it out with 1080p resolution, cause Im thinking of getting a 24" monitor?



Should I invest 20€ rather into the i5-2500k instead of i5-2400 or a better graphics card (HD6850)?


Yep, a 560 Ti should have no problem even at 1080p as long as your other components are up to par.

EDIT: If the choices are 2500k + ATI 6850 or 2400 + GTX 560 Ti, I'd definitely go for the GTX 560 Ti. It's not like the 2400 is going to hold you back.
User avatar
MR.BIGG
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:31 pm

Thanks, so I think Ill go with the 2400, although its 50€ more expensive. 2500k is another 20€ more, but from what I read in tests, it doesn't seem to make that much a difference. Or should I instead invest this into a better graphics card?

I was thinking of getting the MSI GTX 560 Ti, because it is said to be very good in cost/effectiveness and it is listed here under being playable at max. settings. Should I buy it or instead invest some more money for a HD 6950 (20€ more) or even a GTX 570 (100€ more)?

I definetly want to be able to play this game at max. settings.


The 2500K can be OCed to levels that far exceed the 2400's performance....the 2400 has limited OC potential. If you don't plan to overclock your CPU, then the 2400 is fine....just get the better video card.


I found this on Craigslist for $450. The person who is selling it claims it can run Crysis on high. Is it worth it?

AMD Phenom II 955 Quad Core CPU @ 3.4Ghz
6GB Corsair DDR3 RAM
XFX ATi Radeon 5770 HD Video Card
640GB hard drive partitioned to 60GB for fastest possible bootable drive (7.2K RPM)
Additional 120GB 7.2KRPM Media Drive
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MS Office 2007


Not too bad for the money.

Just got this new desktop from :bowdown: pcspecialist cost more than my car is worth :shakehead: i think it will max Skyrim but what do you guys think?
here are the specs

Intel? Core?i7 Processor Extreme Edition i7-990X (3.46GHz) 6.4GTs/12MB Cache
12GB KINGSTON HYPER-X TRI-DDR3 1600MHz, X.M.P (3 x 4GB KIT)
3GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 580 - 2 DVI, HDMI, DP - 3D Vision Ready (3 of these)
2TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD2002FAEX, SATA 6 Gb/s, 64MB CACHE (7200rpm) (2 of these)
ASUS VG236HE 23" 120Hz 3D LCD, HDMI/DVI-D HD, 1920x1080 (2 of these )
NVIDIA 3D "goggles"
ASUS? RAMPAGE III EXTREME: 3-Way SLI & CrossFireX, SATA 6.0GB/s, USB 3.0

those are the most important specs I think.
so will it do the job well?


Sorry to say, but I think you wasted money. Lots of it. There's a point where there is diminishing returns on your investment and that 990X is one big fat eye-sore. You could have gotten similar performance out of the 2600K for considerably less money and it's on more recent technology too. The 990X is simply just not worth it and is on a dead-end socket. Still the most powerful desktop CPU, but will easily be beaten by future Ivy Bridge CPUs...but your motherboard socket won't support one of these. But based on your other components listed there, it seems you have money to blow.

Yes you will max.


I'm assuming no, but I'm posting here just to be sure. Is there any chance that my pc can run Skyrim at all?
Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz
2GB RAM
Nvidia GeForce 7800GTX


It might run, but that CPU is a slow single-core chip. I don't have high expectations with that Pentium 4. Maybe low settings and some lag.
User avatar
x_JeNnY_x
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:52 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:02 am

I got the Radeon HD 5750 1GB and it handles Crysis 2 on max at 40fps average, so I am very sure it can handle Skyrim.
User avatar
Nany Smith
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:13 pm

Will I need the latest ATI drivers to run Skyrim well? The reason I don't download them is because they slow down my FPS on some of my games.
User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:13 pm

Will I need the latest ATI drivers to run Skyrim well? The reason I don't download them is because they slow down my FPS on some of my games.


No, Skyrim will be just like any other game. Although sometimes ATI come out with new drivers that increase performance of your GPU a tad but not always.
User avatar
Nick Jase Mason
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:23 am

Post » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:57 pm

CPU 3.2GHz Intel Core i5 650
Memory 8GB 1.333 DDR3 SDRAM
Graphics 32MB (shared) Intel GMA HD integrated graphics chip
Operating system Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit)
I have a Radeon HD6850 1GB Graphics card coming in, will this up my specs by alot? Maybe play on high?
User avatar
Latino HeaT
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:21 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim