Unofficial "Will my PC run Skyrim" thread #11

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:14 am

Been following the posts...
the Radon 6950 looks amazing... but for like $300 the card has approx. 800 MHz core clock
but I found a GTX 550 for $130 that has a 951 MHz core and 1903 MHz shader.

Am I missing something here?
Because the 6950 seems to have a cult following, but the GTX 550 exceeds the 6950 specs for less than half the price.

BTW I am building a new gaming rig for this fall.
My budget is <$1000

As long as the game will look/perform at least as good on the PC as it will my PS3 I will be happy.
I already have a good monitor & headphones too, so the budget is just for the tower.

I am going with i7 CPU, but beyond that I am open to suggestions.
Especially a graphics card (preferably less than $200 for the card)
User avatar
LuCY sCoTT
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:29 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:41 am

Been following the posts...
the Radon 6950 looks amazing... but for like $300 the card has approx. 800 MHz core clock
but I found a GTX 550 for $130 that has a 951 MHz core and 1903 MHz shader.

Am I missing something here?
Because the 6950 seems to have a cult following, but the GTX 550 exceeds the 6950 specs for less than half the price.

BTW I am building a new gaming rig for this fall.
My budget is <$1000

As long as the game will look/perform at least as good on the PC as it will my PS3 I will be happy.
I already have a good monitor & headphones too, so the budget is just for the tower.

I am going with i7 CPU, but beyond that I am open to suggestions.
Especially a graphics card (preferably less than $200 for the card)


Honestly you'd probably better off saving on your CPU (i5 2500K is great and can be overclocked loads) and spending a bit more on the GPU.

A top rate GPU will have much more of an effect on your ability to play games than bumping up the processor.

Edit: Not saying you need a better GPU any of the ones you mentioned are glorious. As far as prices for nVidia vs AMD it's a pretty difficult debate. I'm going for a 6850/6950 though.
User avatar
bimsy
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:57 pm

Both the CPU and GPu need upgrading. Both upgrading the GPU to a 6870 will be complete overkill for your resolution and you'll notice the difference in a good GPU before a CPU. You can get a 6870 at Newegg.com. It's like $189.99 with two free games with it.


You can't upgrade 99.9% of laptops. Also the ones that you can upgrade don't use desktop GPU's but rather laptop GPU's which are extremely expensive so it's almost never worth upgrading.
User avatar
Rebecca Clare Smith
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:13 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:40 pm

Not sure how familiar you guys are with laptop only parts like my processor and graphics card, but any idea how my laptop will run Skyrim? It handles Oblivion great. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834114903

Operating System - Windows 7 64-Bit
Processor - Intel Core i5 450m (2.4 GHz)
Memory - 4GB DDR3
Display- 18.4 inch 1680x945
Graphics- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360m
Video Memory- 1GB GDDR5


Your CPU is fine, not awesome, but fine.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTS-360M.24058.0.html


I think you'll definitely be doing a bit of tweaking to keep the native resolution.
User avatar
Chad Holloway
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:21 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:50 pm

Been following the posts...
the Radon 6950 looks amazing... but for like $300 the card has approx. 800 MHz core clock
but I found a GTX 550 for $130 that has a 951 MHz core and 1903 MHz shader.

Am I missing something here?
Because the 6950 seems to have a cult following, but the GTX 550 exceeds the 6950 specs for less than half the price.


The frequency is only one of the things you should look when comparing graphics card (and it's relatively non-important, compared to things like the chip's architecture and it's number of cores), but there are another factors, like the number of cores (CUDA cores / Radeon cores), which are the little things that do nearly all the job, memory bus width (the wider, the better), and lastly the amount of RAM.

An example: the GTX 550 Ti has 192 CUDA cores, plus a 192-bit memory bus width, which are both a fairly low amount. That's why it's way cheaper than a 6950 despite having a 900 mhz core clock (the 6950 has BY FAR more cores, plus a 256-bit memory bus).

Also, that's what makes the 550 Ti a low-budget card, while the 6950 is an high-end one.

P.D: The chip's architecture is also important when choosing a GPU. A perfect example is the current Fermi GPU's (GTX 5xx) generally being better than the Radeon HD 6xxx, despite them generally having higher frequencies. That's due to Fermi being (overall) a superior architecture than the 6xxx.
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:04 am

Will the i5 run Skyrim on full eye candy? (given everything else meets the req.)
that would save like $200 between the CPU/MB

And I could afford a better GPU.
User avatar
Auguste Bartholdi
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:20 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:06 pm

Will the i5 run Skyrim on full eye candy? (given everything else meets the req.)
that would save like $200 between the CPU/MB

And I could afford a better GPU.


...what were your specs again?
User avatar
Trent Theriot
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:37 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:35 am

...what were your specs again?


Don't know yet... I am building a new rig.
I have a blank slate with a $1000 budget.
User avatar
Daddy Cool!
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:34 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:52 am

Will the i5 run Skyrim on full eye candy? (given everything else meets the req.)
that would save like $200 between the CPU/MB

And I could afford a better GPU.

Absolutely. The only advantage of i7 is the hyperthreading and that's only useful for some programs but provides little to no benefit in modern games.

Plus as I mentioned if you're into overclocking, the K series can be pushed to massive clock speeds.
User avatar
koumba
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:39 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:43 am

Don't know yet... I am building a new rig.
I have a blank slate with a $1000 budget.


With 1000 bucks you can do way better than a 550 Ti and a i5. If you look for a bit, you should be able to get http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115070, which is one of the best CPU's avaliable. Couple it with a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161373 and you have a hell of a horsepower and still half the money for the mobo, RAM, case, monitor, etc.

And if you feel your budget is still being overpriced (fat chance, if you look correctly for the remaining parts), you can always switch the CPU to a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115072, saving 100 bucks with little (or even barely) noticeable difference.
User avatar
Charity Hughes
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:29 pm

I found this card on Newegg...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127575
with the i5 build I could afford that card and still be $85 under budget.
User avatar
lilmissparty
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:19 am

Your CPU is fine, not awesome, but fine.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTS-360M.24058.0.html


I think you'll definitely be doing a bit of tweaking to keep the native resolution.

Ok, cool. I was worried when I saw Skyrim's beastly graphics, so "fine" is good with me, until I can get the cash for gaming desktop :foodndrink:

Maybe I can get up to High settings with some resolution tweaking.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:51 am

I found this card on Newegg...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127575
with the i5 build I could afford that card and still be $85 under budget.


It barely justifies the extra 60 bucks it costs compared to the one I posted, but, oh well...your choice.
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:02 pm

I found this card on Newegg...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127575
with the i5 build I could afford that card and still be $85 under budget.

Any 6950 will destroy almost any game. As Nordic posted there's 1GB and 2GB variants and different manufactures but that's up to you. Apparently you can clock the 2GB version up to a 6970 but I'm not that sure on how that stuff works.
User avatar
Yung Prince
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:01 pm

With 1000 bucks you can do way better than a 550 Ti and a i5. If you look for a bit, you should be able to get http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115070, which is one of the best CPU's avaliable. Couple it with a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161373 and you have a hell of a horsepower and still half the money for the mobo, RAM, case, monitor, etc.

And if you feel your budget is still being overpriced (fat chance, if you look correctly for the remaining parts), you can always switch the CPU to a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115072, saving 100 bucks with little (or even barely) noticeable difference.


My preliminary stats are:
i7 2600k
HIS Radeon HD 6950
G.Skill 8g RAM
WD 500g 7200 RPM 64 meg cache HD
GIGABYTE MB
Asus DVD burner
Antec 750w PSU
Antec 900 case

Bottom line $1,010.92
Will this build be able to run Skyrim at full eye candy?
Or just about any other game out right now...
User avatar
Yvonne Gruening
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:31 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:09 pm

My preliminary stats are:
i7 2600k
HIS Radeon HD 6950
G.Skill 8g RAM
WD 500g 7200 RPM 64 meg cache HD
GIGABYTE MB
Asus DVD burner
Antec 750w PSU
Antec 900 case

Bottom line $1,010.92
Will this build be able to run Skyrim at full eye candy?
Or just about any other game out right now...


That rig will laugh in the face of whatever you tell it to do. I just wish I could get that at US prices! Stuff in the UK is expensive xD
User avatar
Laura Wilson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:57 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:38 pm

I've read 2 or 3 pages of this and I just can't take it anymore.
I just can't.

Some of you... just.. :dead:


The worst part is that most of your arguments are;
1) based on data and trends from at least 3 years ago, often closer to 6.
2) usually more dependent on the engine (ie; the game itself) than the hardware as pertaining to actual results (eg; number of cores you have vs what performance you'll get).

Some of the crap you guys have been peddling as facts.. or rationality.. Akatosh save me.

Anyway. I'm building a new rig just in time for Skyrim, which is a happy coincidence. All I am wondering about is the maximum memory usage we'll have (I'm going to have 16gb of ddr3 - and yes, I'm very aware I won't be close to all of it for many years), and the optimization of the cores (as I'll have 6 - once again, I'm aware of the excess, thankyou), and how many its "built" for (I suspect core2duo and quad core i7 optimization). Anyone who starts rambling about pedantic [censored] to try to show how much they know; saying it'll run fine even if its only really designed for a dual core or what have you.. I'll just ignore. Yes, yes, you're very knowledgeable, we're all very impressed, and equally, I'm not a simpleton.
I'm getting a hex-core CPU. I'm tempted so badly to just say that, and wait for the first moron to say "LUL DERS NO SUCH THING U PROLBY MEAN ONE OF THOSE MOTHERBOARDS WITH MORE THAN ONE CPU SOCKET LUL" - symptomatic of point 1 - and then pounce with a vengeance.
I'll do it though, i7 980. While yes, I'm very aware at the present time 6 cores is overkill as it generally won't be optimally utilized, neither am I new to this. The same happened with the introduction of the quad cores. I'm building this machine for the long run. Not to mention the clock speed is fine, 3.33 with a 3.60 "turbo boost" (No, I don't need you to tell me that's just a factory preset overclock).

I finished typing this up, and I realised I had a sort of basic guide for those of you who are hardware illiterate. Apparently you frustrated me enough to type this all. So enjoy.

So I don't know a thing about this hardware business. I want to play Skyrim. What do I need to know, without getting too technical on my plebeian proverbial?

Well first off you need to be aware that all this computer magubbins is not as simple as I'm going to try to make it for you. Everything depends on everything else. However, a general rule of thumb is you get what you pay for. The more expensive, the better, and you will notice results.


Graphics Cards:

Please note I didn't say GPU. This is because I know what I'm talking about, and am not simply trying to sound smart. Basically the GPU is the processor that handles the graphics, but it is not the be all and end all of a graphics card.
People after new graphics cards - be aware that benchmark results do not merely depend on the graphics cards, and especially not just the GPU itself. Nor does the performance you'll get in a game, or even the framerate or what graphics settings you'll be able to use. Remember I said everything depends on everything else? Also internet benchmarks are generally unreliable. Look around, they'll contradict each other. This is because most of these benchmarks are consumer submitted (submitted by people like you and me, and everything depends on what? Exactly. They all have different systems around their cards, and so get different results. Not to mention that different benchmarking methods... Look we'll leave it at that okay?). Note I didn't say GPU, because that's not all that matters on a graphics card. Everything matters on a graphics card. VRAM, GPU clock speed, even cooling. To buy a card based on only one factor is folly.

I'd prioritize in this order:

- Roughly how much can I spend?
more = better.

- Has it got decent cooling?
If it's a s[censored]y tiny fan, I wouldn't risk it if I were you. Not if you want to push the card for a few years. If it has lots of metal fins, pipes, and a nice chunky radiator, or multiple fans.. That's a good thing. Trust me, when you're pushing what your card can handle, it's detrimental to its lifespan, and it gets damn hot. So you want to keep it cool and give it the best chance of reaching old age you can.

- How much VRAM has it got?
People think this is much more important than it actually is, but its helpful.

- How much is it and what series number has it got?
Spend as much as I can and look for the highest series number. Eg; get a 580 instead of a 570, if I'm satisfied with all the prior points.


Also the Nvidia vs ATI race has basically cooled. Now you'll basically get the same sort of results for the same sort of money. Personally I'm going for a GTX570 (a good version) because I've been reading all sorts of confusing as hell stuff about the different ATI cards and what they're designed for, plus general consensus is that the 580 is the best inclusive of ATI, and this factory overclocked, masterfully cooled 570 isn't too far off. Also considerably cheaper. Basically I'd just buy whatever is most expensive that you can afford, and make sure it has good cooling. I've burnt out graphics cards before, you don't want that.

Also be aware, your PSU (Power Supply) does matter, but unless you're running SLI, or CROSSFIRE (that's multiple graphics cards guys), or a bucketload of hard drives, you should be fine if your upgrade is marginal - ie; going from a 9 series geforce to a 250 or something, not a 6 to a 500. 500W/600W is generally enough for a basic "generic" modern system. If you have anything less than about a GTX 250, go pick up something for ~$100. It'll be an improvement. Be aware of bottlenecking your system, unless you have a good dual core, you'll get a heavy bottleneck on a graphics card that level or above. Also be aware new cards are massive. If you're running a geforce 7 series or earlier, also note you may not have any PCI-E slots on your motherboard. Really, its time for an upgrade (of your whole PC).


CPUs:

As for CPUs, Intel. As much as you can spend. That's that sorted. If you're buying a CPU generally you'll need to buy a new motherboard as well. AMD are dead and for good reason (7 years ago they were generally better. That was 7 years ago.) Anyone who is new to PC's, you can only put certain CPU's on certain motherboards. Be aware of that. If you didn't know that, do not build it yourself. It'll only go badly. For the rest of you, keep in mind you'll need an X58 board for a high end i7.
If you insist on building a system yourself, find a CPU you want, and buy a motherboard for it. Core2Duo's and I think Core2Quads (I don't use one and I'm not checking for you, you have google too) both use LGA775 sockets, screw i5s frankly (if you're going to upgrade, get a damn i7.. also see the point about googling), and i7s use 1366.
If you want to overclock, please don't use the damn stock fans they give you. It's insulting.
If you're buying a new PC I would personally stress spending as much as you can on a CPU, at the expense of other components. Other parts (graphics cards, hard drives, RAM) are much easier to upgrade later. For this reason I'd suggest getting a beefy PSU as well.


Memory/RAM:

If you're confused about the difference between "memory" and "RAM" see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdREEcfaihg.
I'd suggest you won't need or even make use of any more than 4gb of memory (I'm aware of how it looks when I said I'm getting 16gb). 4gb is normal these days. With memory, amount is more important than speed (though speed is always good). If you don't have 4gb, you have no excuse. It's cheap. If you aren't running a 64bit Operating System (then you are running 32-bit aka x86), you can't use more than 3.7gb of that RAM. If you're using 64-bit (x64) operating system, you can basically run as much as your motherboard will support. Most newer consumer level motherboards will support 24gb.


I'm ugly so I need a tl;dr:

Guys, if you have anything similar to what I'm running RIGHT now (minus my upgrades since I bought it)...

- Intel Core2Duo e6400, 2 cores @ 2.13gHz
- Nvidia GeForce NX7950GT (Now running Nvidia GTX250 it's heavily bottlenecked but I fried my NX7950GT - for the purposes of this pretend i still have the 7 series)
- 1gb ddr2 RAM. (I now have 4gb RAM, pretend I still have 1 for the purpose of this again.. Believe you me, getting 4gb is a massive performance increase overall)

Then it's probably time for an upgrade. That is, if you want to play Skyrim without going totally insane.

If you have a dual core of ~3gHz or better, you have 4gb of RAM and you have a decent graphics card, you'll most likely be fine running on reasonable settings. If you want max performance, I'd say 6gb of RAM just in case the game can make use of it, a 3gHz or faster i7, and a 5 series Nvidia card (don't know enough about ATI to comment on those). Though its likely even top systems won't be able to fully max out.


To finish:
Reason I didn't talk about PSU much or anything else stupid is because it won't give you better performance. You just need enough wattage for what you're running. Use a power supply calculator (google it). Getting a reputable brand is important for any component, including power supply (I'd probably stress it most for PSU, a dodgy one is easy to buy by accident, and can harm your other parts - its impossible to buy a bad brand CPU for example), but whoever said wattage wasn't important, just brand.. wow.
Keep in mind all PSU's (even reputable brand ones) should be considered to have a +/- 5% of actual wattage vs stated wattage. ie; buy a 500W, you might only get 450W. You might also get 550W. So keep some room. Also if you like hard drives (I'll have 12tb soon - that's ~12000gb's), be aware they svck power.



To the OP:

Don't know if this is worth a quote, but it might be something to think about. Also I'll edit this up if needed.


Aside from that, I hope this helped some of you. Thanks for reading.
User avatar
Neliel Kudoh
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:39 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:55 am

My preliminary stats are:
i7 2600k
HIS Radeon HD 6950
G.Skill 8g RAM
WD 500g 7200 RPM 64 meg cache HD
GIGABYTE MB
Asus DVD burner
Antec 750w PSU
Antec 900 case

Bottom line $1,010.92
Will this build be able to run Skyrim at full eye candy?
Or just about any other game out right now...


Kickass build at your target 1000 bucks. What else you want? :)
User avatar
ashleigh bryden
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:12 am

1) based on data and trends from at least 3 years ago, often closer to 6.


Really? I still have to see a suggestion that is tagged as "worthy of being said 3-6 years ago". I don't recall anybody suggesting to put in their new rigs a Geforce 9600GT, or a Radeon HD 4850.

Anyways, I'm in no mood to start a flamewar. I just quote that to point that your "article" is as flawed as that only line.
User avatar
Natasha Biss
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:47 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:42 pm

Really? I still have to see a suggestion that is tagged as "worthy of being said 3-6 years ago". I don't recall anybody suggesting to put in their new rigs a Geforce 9600GT, or a Radeon HD 4850.

Anyways, I'm in no mood to start a flamewar. I just quote that to point that your "article" is as flawed as that only line.


In reference to games not being optimized for quad-cores, which is an archaic issue that is just non-existent anymore. I'm sure I read it somewhere. Anyway nice to be appreciated.
User avatar
HARDHEAD
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:31 am

-Snip-

Thanks for the post clearly you have some knowledge of the topic and I just have a couple of things to say.

Firstly, there was no need to be such an [censored]hole about it.

And you didn't really provide a good reason to not get an i5 processor. "Screw i5s" is hardly a good case. With regard to games (Which I assume is what we're talking about) i7 offers little advantage so I don't think saying 'Just get an i7' is a responsible suggestion when people could save considerable amounts of money [I do notice that this is clearly not one of your personal priorities since you're going straight to hexacore already haha].

But yeah, that must have taken a fair bit of time and input is always appreciated round here!
User avatar
Emma Copeland
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:37 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:30 pm

In reference to games not being optimized for quad-cores, which is an archaic issue that is just non-existent anymore. I'm sure I read it somewhere. Anyway nice to be appreciated.


Although I'd really like to be one, sadly I'm no physic, so next time be specific about what you say. And in any case, games taking profit of multi-core are not SO standart as to complain about it. I consider we're still quite in the "transition" stage.

And in any case (x2), I still have to see someone recommending buying a new CPU with less than 4 cores. And about Skyrim running on 2 cores CPU...why not exactly? it's perfectly viable.

And you didn't really provide a good reason to not get an i5 processor. "Screw i5s" is hardly a good case. With regard to games (Which I assume is what we're talking about) i7 offers little advantage so I don't think saying 'Just get an i7' is a responsible suggestion when people could save considerable amounts of money.


It depends of the frequencies. I'm not that familiarized with Intel CPU's, but I've quite seen a difference between an i5 3,2 Ghz (top of the line?) and a i7 Turbo-Cored (3,8). That's some nice extra 600 mhz for 100 extra bucks. Add HT and probably (don't know exactly) more L1/3 cache, and it seems a decent deal to me.
User avatar
Laura Hicks
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:44 am

Thanks for the post clearly you have some knowledge of the topic and I just have a couple of things to say.

Firstly, there was no need to be such an [censored]hole about it.

And you didn't really provide a good reason to not get an i5 processor. "Screw i5s" is hardly a good case. With regard to games (Which I assume is what we're talking about) i7 offers little advantage so I don't think saying 'Just get an i7' is a responsible suggestion when people could save considerable amounts of money [I do notice that this is clearly not one of your personal priorities since you're going straight to hexacore already haha].

But yeah, that must have taken a fair bit of time and input is always appreciated round here!


It's not being anything censored. It's tough love. ;) Also people like the guy who's already nitpicking (incorrectly so) are the reason for it.
As for i5 vs i7 - I've heard the opposite, I've heard many times that the i7s are by far the best, they're just damn expensive. So personally I think trying to convince people to go one better on their CPU is responsible, especially as in the long run its easier to deal with, as I talked about. The stats might not seem that big a difference but remember you're talking across multiple cores, it adds up quick. Plus the architecture of the i7 is just plain better. Basically, they just work better. i5s are so.. middle ground. The CPU is the basis of the entire system. If you want it to be decent in 5 years, you need a very sixy CPU.

Anyways, thanks for the thanks. :)

Although I'd really like to be one, sadly I'm no physic, so next time be specific about what you say. And in any case, games taking profit of multi-core are not SO standart as to complain about it. I consider we're still quite in the "transition" stage.

And in any case (x2), I still have to see someone recommending buying a new CPU with less than 4 cores. And about Skyrim running on 2 cores CPU...why not exactly? it's perfectly viable.


I'm sorry but you obviously don't know what you're saying. I put in my tl;dr section, specifically written for.. okay I won't say that..
But it's in the tl;dr section that I go as far as recommend a dual core would be sufficient..
If you have a dual core of ~3gHz or better, you have 4gb of RAM and you have a decent graphics card, you'll most likely be fine running on reasonable settings.

so um.. nice work arguing with me using my own point. :shakehead: sigh. I don't know why you despise my post so much, but I'm not gonna bother with you anymore, sorry.
User avatar
Jason Wolf
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:30 am

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:45 pm

I'm sorry but you obviously don't know what you're saying. I put in my tl;dr section, specifically written for.. okay I won't say that..
But it's in the tl;dr section that I go as far as recommend a dual core would be sufficient..


If you argue against people giving "advice worthy of 3-6 years old" while saying "2 cores will be enough" (thus saying the same most people say, at least for what I've read so far), it's your incoherence/hypocrisy problem.

For myself, I'm clear regarding this:

- Crappy CPU with less than 2 cores and 2,8 Ghz = Upgrade.

- Any CPU superior to that: worthy of trying if the GPU is nice, and even worthy of spending a bit of cash on a new GPU if it isn't.

I ALWAYS recommend people to buy components based on what they have. And I certainly don't invent false statements trying to blame people.

In any case, I said I'm in no mood for flame wars, so I'm done with you too. If you want an advice from my part: be nicer next time.
User avatar
James Smart
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:40 am

Hey whats up guys I was planning on getting an Alienware Aurora, and need suggestions on what specs should I get for skyrim. Here is a link to the page so you guys can tell me what I should get and what specs http://www.alienware...ops.aspx?~ck=mn

So I really want to know about which video cards I should get and such. I really appreciate any help, thanks

Also PLEASE NO SUGGESTIONS ON BUILDING A COMPUTER, I REPEAT PLEASE NO SUGGESTIONS ON BUILDING A COMPUTER
User avatar
TWITTER.COM
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:15 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim