I'd just give up now, dude. Gorbad is stubbornly set to refuse it, and I can't blame him for that. When he said he wanted Valton to be "normal", I think he mean unique, but with realism. A sload just isnt realistic in this situation.
I disagree with you. A sload is realistic in any situation with the TES setting, given the right reason.
And Gorbad if anything has given me more reason to campaign for it- I see this as a way too common negative on this forum.
Stereotypes are not good when they effect the creativity or freedom of authors, especially when there isn't a designated rule per say.
I bet if I applied another non-playable race I'd get the same response from you guys. Which is pretty stupid, really.
The boundaries of the Elder Scrolls games are enormous. What we see in Skyrim for instance is miniscule to what we should really be seeing.
Pale Pass would be a good example. We should be seeing snake-men or at least asiatic esque ghosts there, not a bunch of imperials in blades armour.
The design designations of a development team cannot allow for full view of the TES world in lore and thus, we cannot explore the full scope.
Morrowind for instance should of had sload present. There was concept art of them and I'm pretty sure the ascended sleeper skeleton was intended for one.
But time constraints or too many bugs/glitches often hinder the true sight that the development team are only trying to give us a taste of.
So people, get off your high horses for a second and try to use your mind constructively, instead of outright bashing a sheet because 'it's a sload.'
I mean for one: "Ok, let's say if we were to allow such a character in the RP. Should we make parameters on how many of these could be made?"
Because if you did make the exception, it would be exactly that- the exception. You wouldn't want loads of these characters, sure, I understand that.
But that's not to mean you couldn't allow say two of them to approach the RP setting with good enough reason from the backstory. So be open minded.