a very controversial, but popular, topic

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:06 am

One of my favorite mods for morrowind and oblivion is the "better bodies" mod (THIS IS NOT A THREAD ABOUT THE BETTER BODIES MOD). Most of you who use mods probably know of it. What it does is get rid of the glued on underwear and when you take everything, you take EVERYTHING. Revealing otherwise revealed "mature" parts. I would like this added to the game with a default setting being the cloths stay on. It shouldn't be a problem if "underwear" is an option to take or leave when looting. Personally I enjoyed streaking in morrowind. Made the comments all the more funny. What say y'all?

The option should be for equipable/unequipable underwear on the option menu. Even if turned on you would still have the option of actually taking the knickers.
That way you can make it "appropriate" when necessary.

Highlighted points

quote LostInSpace
*shrug* I do agree that it's not a *huge* problem, and that Bethesda will probably go the safe route to avoid idiot clamoring around their products - who could blame them to want to avoid that outcry.

Still, it is sad. What's problematic with nudity ? As Unclellama rightfully pointed out, we can blow up villages in games, but a micrometre of bare skin, oh my... How odd is that. :mellow: Anyway, I do use the Better Bodies naked mod. I wanted better shaped bodies, and why not remove those illogical underwears all the same ? It's a detail, but it feels more right. Like having windows you could actually see through. Or scabbards to your swords.

Anyway, mods while being awesome, aren't a systematic answer for everything, not even for background things. Having uncanny NPCs face did not prevent us to play Oblivion ; it's sort of minor : what would you think if Bethesda, instead of working on implementing better faces in Skyrim, told us to "go get mods" ?

It's a point worth discussing, I reckon. Again, to quote Unclellama, sure Bethesda would get a lot of heat, but games and movies could make bit by bit a difference, in a natural, neither prude nor obscene, view of nudity. :)

quote Unclellama
I think that you could argue that the *primary* purpose of Better Bodies was to make bodies look better :-)

It was available both in nvde and non-nvde versions.

What I would like is undergarments as a seperate object. nvde mods are all very well, but it seems wierd that you end up stripping down all the bandits just to loot their armour.

Plus, there's lots of potential in a snowy environment for catching a cold (that drains stamina or something) if not equipped with wooly underwear. And possibly a 'naked Nord' perk that prevents this need.

As for nudity in general: sure, there are a lot of reasons not to have it in the vanilla game, but none of those reasons have to do with the game itself... In game, not being able to take off your clothes is just an arbitrary restriction.

I don't expect it to be possible to take off your clothes in Skyrim, and don't care that much either way, but I would be pleasantly surprised if it is possible. There are lots of good roleplaying reasons for taking one's clothes off - for example, research shows that it heightens the sanitary value of having a bath.

quote Sshodan
While a body replacement, and a nvde one at that is close to the first mod that I will be installing, I don't think that it would be a default option - even Better Bodies had a permanent underwear version for thous who wanted it :) Having removable underwear can be realistic, and hilarious in some cases (how about putting some enchantment on your knickers? :D), but with the amount of complaining and whining it will arise in the community it may be not the best move to make it a default setting...
But I see a problem for console players... So maybe an optional feature?



quote LostInSpace
*shrug* I do agree that it's not a *huge* problem, and that Bethesda will probably go the safe route to avoid idiot clamoring around their products - who could blame them to want to avoid that outcry.

Still, it is sad. What's problematic with nudity ? As Unclellama rightfully pointed out, we can blow up villages in games, but a micrometre of bare skin, oh my... How odd is that. :mellow: Anyway, I do use the Better Bodies naked mod. I wanted better shaped bodies, and why not remove those illogical underwears all the same ? It's a detail, but it feels more right. Like having windows you could actually see through. Or scabbards to your swords.

Anyway, mods while being awesome, aren't a systematic answer for everything, not even for background things. Having uncanny NPCs face did not prevent us to play Oblivion ; it's sort of minor : what would you think if Bethesda, instead of working on implementing better faces in Skyrim, told us to "go get mods" ?

It's a point worth discussing, I reckon. Again, to quote Unclellama, sure Bethesda would get a lot of heat, but games and movies could make bit by bit a difference, in a natural, neither prude nor obscene, view of nudity. :)

quote Rezro Variant
Of course you should be able to be completely 'nvde' in Skyrim. People always suggest modifications will add 'nudity' so it doesn't matter anyway or it shouldn't be added because it can be added for those that want it on the PC through modifications, but not everyone will be able to get the PC version. The largest audience of people are still buying The Elder Scrolls for the consoles. Besides, those modifications made by people wouldn't be considered canon. It would be nice to see the ones behind the game designing the 'nudity.'

Since for some reason it's still an issue for people, there should be an option in the menu to turn on and off all 'nudity.' It could be defaulted as turning all 'nudity' off, and would make it exactly like Oblivion where the underwear/bra cannot be taken off and also for people being looted it would not remove their underwear/bra. Additionally, if there is a mission like in Oblivion where your character is supposed to be 'nvde' (the mission where you get your clothes removed in the Mage's dream world) it would enact it like Oblivion where everything but the underwear/bra is removed...


quote mumatil
I would like better textures and different underwear. Wierd how everyone wears a loin cloth under their clothes wether their wearing silk or raggs. :confused:

Nudity? Not needed for the game and would only lead toward angry dumb parents(who should actually start parenting) causing problems and less sales for Beth due to countries with stricter maturity ratings.


Poor India and Austrailia....



quote Madaras Zore
As previously mentioned (not by me) underwear is important in keeping your valuables warm. (so you don't lose em) Someone could strip you for any number of reasons, maybe you aren't wearing underwear under your pants! that 1 pound encumbrance you found unnecessary so you got rid of them, or maybe you have a phobia. Any number of ways you can look at it. Even you just meet up with some cruel bandits who's friend you left to die naked in the mountains! So many possibilities especially now in gaming.

quote Madaras Zore
I find boobs tasteless, and mainly enjoyed by the....well people like you. No offense. Maybe it's because I'm ex-military as to why I don't have a strong, gross, reaction. It's just normal. I think the girls should have underwear as well, and we "could" choose to undress those we kill as much as any guy character....necromancy would be a bit creepier that way, but hey it's your necro-harem if you want it :shakehead:



quote Madaras Zore
Good point!(:P) Speaking of necro-harems if you happen to have one I'm sure you'd be very unpopular and you might have family members of those dead try and kill you, the guards won't like it either, not to mention you'd have many people who just object to you having undead wenches living in your mansion, however you might be able to develop a cult of followers. (A bit of radiant AI role playing aspect of the game)

User avatar
Laura Tempel
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:53 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:23 am

What does this have to do with BB? I also don't see how they could implement any sort of mod that improves body textures either. Basically all you are asking for are decent body textures here, which isn't controversial at all, and then for some reason bring up nudity.
User avatar
jenny goodwin
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:57 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 11:25 am

dude, this is the elder scrolls, a mature fantasy rpg. Mature doesn't mean you should streak, nor should such a thing be part of the game. I mean, cmon how old are you? Grow up, for pete's sake...
User avatar
Astargoth Rockin' Design
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 10:53 am

I don't care, but nudity hurts the game's image (even though we can argue about how appropriate it is until the cows come home). I would rather TES went for underwear so that BGS doesn't have to worry about the stupid Australian controversy.
User avatar
Peter P Canning
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:44 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 6:24 am

What does this have to do with BB? I also don't see how they could implement any sort of mod that improves body textures either. Basically all you are asking for are decent body textures here, which isn't controversial at all, and then for some reason bring up nudity.


The betterbodies mod, let me recheck to see if the name is right...it is. It's primary purpose (as far as I can tell) was to be able to add nudity, so it is very related and is controversial.
User avatar
JERMAINE VIDAURRI
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:06 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 9:58 am

I don't care, but nudity hurts the game's image (even though we can argue about how appropriate it is until the cows come home). I would rather TES went for underwear so that BGS doesn't have to worry about the stupid Australian controversy.


Agreed. It can be argued either which way, but I'd rather have the game released everywhere, and without that kind of controversy :shrug: If you're on a PC, you can just download another mod to do it - doubtless there will be one made.
User avatar
Krystina Proietti
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:02 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 8:33 am

I don't care that much really, but that comes off as puerile more than mature, tbh. Not what I'd normally expect to find on a TES games.
User avatar
Nany Smith
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:08 pm

dude, this is the elder scrolls, a mature fantasy rpg. Mature doesn't mean you should streak, nor should such a thing be part of the game. I mean, cmon how old are you? Grow up, for pete's sake...


It's not a childish thing (and I believe my age is on my profile, if not then it's 22) I know I'm not the only one who found it annoying that underwear was attached to your skin. It just makes no sense. (BTW you should try to make more mature comments then trying to insult someone by their age, the mods seem to not like that)
User avatar
Samantha Wood
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:41 pm

The betterbodies mod, let me recheck to see if the name is right...it is. It's primary purpose (as far as I can tell) was to be able to add nudity, so it is very related and is controversial.



Dead Wrong

The Better Bodies mod was to introduce just that: Better Bodies, with more realistic proportions, higher poly models, and skin deform rather than the ugly, seamed modular bodies of the vanilla game. There were nvde and non-nvde options, so you could have better bodies with the default underware, or without if that was what you wnted (but that was not the point of the mod).
User avatar
gemma
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:10 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:32 am

The betterbodies mod, let me recheck to see if the name is right...it is. It's primary purpose (as far as I can tell) was to be able to add nudity, so it is very related and is controversial.

http://bb.psychodogstudios.net/male_undies.jpg
This is what its primary purpose was. They offered a version that included nudity, but it was mainly intended to do that in the link. And "nudity" is not synonymous at all with "better bodies".
But come on, why the crap would you name a nudie mod "Better Bodies"?
User avatar
jennie xhx
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:28 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:59 am

Not something I worry too much about, but yeah, it's true the comments were funnier.

The only real snag I find with permaglued underwear, was the Solstheim Berserkers. I mean... It was just bizarre. I would have gone more for naked, or wearing tatters.
User avatar
megan gleeson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:01 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:21 am

i want nudity on creatures that need nudity


look at oblivions spider daedra- that thing was meant to be topless
User avatar
Melanie
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:54 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 4:17 pm

Dead Wrong

The Better Bodies mod was to introduce just that: Better Bodies, with more realistic proportions, higher poly models, and skin deform rather than the ugly, seamed modular bodies of the vanilla game. There were nvde and non-nvde options, so you could have better bodies with the default underware, or without if that was what you wnted (but that was not the point of the mod).


If I'm "dead wrong" as you say, then why was their a "nvde or non-nvde, or only naked women" options. Apparently it was important for the creator to add them. So I would hardly dismiss that as being one of the main objectives.
User avatar
Joanne
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:25 pm

Actually, the primary purpose of Better Bodies is, as its name implies, to improve the quality of the in-game body models, by replacing the original segmented bodies which Morrowind used with ones that lack visible segments and as a whole look more realistic. The nudity is not its main function, which is why, when you install it, you'll be asked if you want to install the nvde or underwear versions. Obviously, those who created the mod wanted to include the option to have nudity in the game, maybe it's even the option they'd personally recommend, or maybe not, I've never felt the need to try to find out, but had it been the only purpose of the mod, I don't think the option would have been there at all.

As far as seeing nudity as an option available by default in Skyrim, I highly doubt it will happen, because, at least in America, where Bethesda is based, there are those who would certainly raise controvercy if nudity were included in the game, now, how other countries would react depends on the general public's own view on the matter, but at least in the US, it's like that. Now, there have been some games which have included some level of nudity in the past, of course, but they are not all that common, and as a whole, the American public seems much more willing to accept graphic violence in video games than explicit nudity, so I'd imagine Bethesda will want to leave this out. As much as I don't like using the "It can be modded" argument, in this case, I think those who want to see this will simply need to wait for a mod, or make it themselves if they have the tools and skills to do so.
User avatar
Ann Church
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:41 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 5:24 am

They are about as likely to do this as they are to have lady gaga do the title song.
User avatar
Jenna Fields
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:36 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:54 pm

It's not a childish thing (and I believe my age is on my profile, if not then it's 22) I know I'm not the only one who found it annoying that underwear was attached to your skin. It just makes no sense. (BTW you should try to make more mature comments then trying to insult someone by their age, the mods seem to not like that)



I don't understand why its a problem, why are you taking your characters clothes off? I'd assume 98% of the time that mod is used by people wwwaaaayyy under the age to watch porm (well... buy) so look at naked girls, even if it is just in a videogame. I don't really care if these kids want to see naked girls all over the place, but it doesn't seem to need to be there. It would cause a HUGE amount of uproar not only for australia but also in the states (where nudity and sixuality are worse than violence and profanity for some reason).

It could cause the game to not be sold in australia, it could stop stores from carrying it in the states thanks to AO rating, and for what? If its THAT much of an issue, buy a pc and DL the mod... then you can oogle furry kajjit boobs all day.
User avatar
Ash
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:59 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:12 pm

I don't understand why its a problem, why are you taking your characters clothes off? I'd assume 98% of the time that mod is used by people wwwaaaayyy under the age to watch porm (well... buy) so look at naked girls, even if it is just in a videogame. I don't really care if these kids want to see naked girls all over the place, but it doesn't seem to need to be there. It would cause a HUGE amount of uproar not only for australia but also in the states (where nudity and sixuality are worse than violence and profanity for some reason).

It could cause the game to not be sold in australia, it could stop stores from carrying it in the states thanks to AO rating, and for what? If its THAT much of an issue, buy a pc and DL the mod... then you can oogle furry kajjit boobs all day.


Well you obviously assume too much. I for one would never take a womans cloths off, I'm quite the prude. For me it was all about how my character RPed, and it was much fun.

I was actually upset that better bodies let you install (nvde/non-nvde/only naked women, but not only naked men...quite upsetting I couldn't take any pants a women carried)
User avatar
Nauty
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:58 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 3:17 pm

I think the option for no underwear would hurt Skyrim's reception among the general public and give it a lot of bad press. People tend to overreact on this kind of issue.

Personally, I wouldn't mind if it was in, but if it's gonna make Bethesda lose revenue, leave it out.
User avatar
Andrew Perry
 
Posts: 3505
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:40 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 5:08 am

I think that you could argue that the *primary* purpose of Better Bodies was to make bodies look better :-)

It was available both in nvde and non-nvde versions.

What I would like is undergarments as a seperate object. nvde mods are all very well, but it seems wierd that you end up stripping down all the bandits just to loot their armour.

Plus, there's lots of potential in a snowy environment for catching a cold (that drains stamina or something) if not equipped with wooly underwear. And possibly a 'naked Nord' perk that prevents this need.

As for nudity in general: sure, there are a lot of reasons not to have it in the vanilla game, but none of those reasons have to do with the game itself... In game, not being able to take off your clothes is just an arbitrary restriction.

I don't expect it to be possible to take off your clothes in Skyrim, and don't care that much either way, but I would be pleasantly surprised if it is possible. There are lots of good roleplaying reasons for taking one's clothes off - for example, research shows that it heightens the sanitary value of having a bath.
User avatar
chirsty aggas
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:23 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:25 pm

No, I don't like having nvde people in my game. If I want nudity I'll find a mod for it.

Also, Better Bodies was not primarily made to have nudity in their game, it was made as an improved replacement for crappy bodies in the vanilla version. It had both nvde and underwear variants.
User avatar
Juliet
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:49 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 7:25 am

Lol it's sad that in game nudity is more frowned apon than murder, just a thought.
User avatar
Steeeph
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:28 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 2:07 am

They are about as likely to do this as they are to have lady gaga do the title song.


I want Lady gaga doing the title song. At least as a toggleable option, right under nudity, fast travel and level scaling.
User avatar
dav
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 pm

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:11 am

They sort of had it in Arena/Daggerfall. Maybe upper bodies but no genitalia please. It's not necessary and just gives the game a bad image among parents (not that I care, but Bethe$da likes money).
User avatar
Sabrina Schwarz
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:02 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 1:35 pm

I don't care at all. I doesn't bother me if it's there, but I certainly won't miss it if not.
I'm here to save the world, not to touch my tralala in front of a dead bandit's corpse.
User avatar
noa zarfati
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:54 am

Post » Tue May 17, 2011 12:37 pm

I don't mind having the option for nudity either. But I can clearly see it provoking childish (even from 22 years old people) and hysterical reactions. It's better left out while the majority of society is not able to handle it with a mature attitude.
User avatar
Antony Holdsworth
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:50 am

Next

Return to V - Skyrim