How many times do I have to say, I didn't dislike the game. I was just dissapointed with things. There is a big difference between dissapointment and dislike. If you're not going to read all my posts then don't reply.
I think the game looks good graphics wise.
I didn't like FNV either, but I didn't rain on the parade.
I did pay attention to see whether many of the trailers had 'made from ingame footage' type advice; I also noted that the engine hadn't changed, the clunky graphics and characterisations were the same; and post release I saw that the dialogue system was similar to recent releases by other developers, who have also been criticised for the same reasons about using a 'themed' dialogue approach.
I'm no apologist, but I'm also no unnecessary sledger...FO4 does have differences, it has improvements, and it has shortfalls...where things are do get bad is when the same issues are repeated through four previous releases, particularly bugs and glitches. My personal view is that FO4 will really cater to a fairly specific audience, in many ways...but only time will tell on that.
I hated New Vegas, so dull, boring & depressing. It was devoid of anything interesting. I didn't even finish it. The weapon selection & iron sights were good but that's it.
Ps. I enjoyed the card games too, forgot that part
I did too. I tried three times and never could finish it. I understand that people have different tastes, and people hate the games that I like, but man, I never did care for New Vegas.
I tried 6-7 times just to beat it and "have fun" with it but yeah I couldn't either.
Honestly I think they did a great job sure they changed up a few things but that's to be expected ... If they didn't you would be complaining they rewrapped NV