A brief comment on the state of the argument at present. M'Aiq is suggesting that the dream of the dreamed dreamer is separate from the dream of the original dreamer. Others are suggesting that this is not the case. As things stand, the details of the relation between the first and secondary dreamers is not at all obvious to me, and until someone can provide a good reason for their view on the matter (and stating it with a lot of conviction doesn't count) we're in something of a stalemate. If anyone wants to puruse the issue in a way that isn't just wild speculation, the loveletter seems like the place to start.
Dammit, I hate it when I have to explain my point.
His original point wasn't concerning the first and second dreamer, but rather only the second dreamer. His contention seemed to be simply that since the people living in the illusion are unaware of the one person achieving CHIM and thereby encompassing all of them that it was really only in that person's head. His entire theory is based on third person observation of the one who has achieved CHIM. What everybody and their mother have been trying to point out is that when it comes to CHIM, you can't have third person observation due to "A whole World of You" and "I are all we."
It doesn't need any further explanation than the very nature of the metaphysics and what CHIM is, which everybody should already know (which is why most people just disagree on principle):
"The Wheel created it. The Wheel is the structure of this universe, and it is easiest to see it that way."Vehk's Teachingswhich is based on the fact that
"All creation is subgradient. First was Void, which became split by AE."The Loveletterwhich is referring to
"Anu encompassed, and encompasses, all things. So that he might know himself he created Anuiel, his soul and the soul of all things... Anuiel, who was the soul of all things, therefore became many things, and this interplay was and is the Aurbis."The Monomythwhich affects you in such a way that
"Imagine being able to feel with all of your senses the relentless alien terror that is God and your place in it, which is everywhere and therefore nowhere, and realizing that it means the total dissolution of your individuality into boundless being. Imagine that and then still being able to say "I"."Vehk's Teachingswhich allows for
"I AM AND I ARE ALL WE."The Lovelettermeaning that there is no third person, no 'they'.
And then as final proof that its not just in their head, that the general populace can witness the one with CHIM (which the OP disagrees with):
"I breathe now, in royalty, and reshape this land which is mine. I do this for you, Red Legions, for I love you."The Many-Headed TalosEverything is just one thing dividing itself up infinite times like a hologram, 'you' and 'them' are just part of one schizophrenic godhead hallucinating. The Loveletter doesn't say that you completely separate yourself from the schizophrenic godhead and his hallucination (like the OP suggests), hence its both "I AM"
and "I ARE ALL WE". The nature of the universe says that you are encompassing everything. You're not leaving this nature, you're delving further into it, hence calling it
"subcreation AFTER mortal death",
"the final subgradient of all AE" and
"Jumping beyond the last bridge of all existence is the Last Existence, The Eternal I." Its still subceation, still a subgradient, you're not leaving anything to exist "separate" as the OP suggests, you're going deeper into it. The trick is that this seems to serve a circular purpose (like I alluded to before):
"It is a return to the first brush of Anu-Padomay, where stasis and change created possibility."Vehk's Teachings which is
"Anu and Padomay came next and with their first brush came the Aurbis."The LoveletterFinally I reference:
"The ruling king that sees in another his equivalent rules nothing."Sermon11 and
"Above them all is the horizon where only one stands, though no one stands there yet."Sermon13. Only 'one' stands there, there can't be multiple. If he has an equivalent then he rules nothing, if there are two then they're back to the drawing board. If there are two then you no longer have "I ARE ALL WE" because the guy standing in front of you negates it - you can't be I ARE ALL WE while a HIM exists to prove you wrong. The only difference between your previous state and the one you're currently occupying would be that instead of it being you a billion other people making up the schizophrenia that it'd just be you and him, maybe you'd have to reachieve CHIM or something by saying "I AM ALL THE TWO OF US". Of course, this is impossible anyway, two people can't achieve CHIM. Like I said before, if "I ARE ALL WE" then all of 'them' are part of me. For 'them' to achieve CHIM would mean that they're realizing that they're just a part of my schizophrenia. The possibilities I see here are three: 1) they'll replace me (or contest me) 2) they'll have delved deeper into my 'I', reached that subgradient and somehow have achieved CHIM within my CHIM, or 3) it will be wholly impossible for them to make this realization due to my own lucidity (whereas presumably the original dreamer was not lucid which allowed for my achievement). [Both Option 1 & 2 (but mostly 2) seems to me to reflect M'Aiq and Dumbkid's idea that the godhead was once a person too].
Again, the nature of the universe says that you are encompassing everything. The OP's ideas rest on third person observation. The universe (I are all we) says that there is no third person to do this observing. If there's a third person to be an observer then you've missed something along the way and whatever you've achieved it isn't CHIM.
The duckies are tired now, I hope you're happy. If my guess is right then I'm guessing that you're going to ignore my entire post minus the bit in the last paragraph which I said might support your theory in some minor way and thereby continue to miss the entire point.
:turtle: