I was referring to your comment about the gimmicky and 'illusion' of large scale mountains. How can you know that the mountains will be small scale and stupid when you haven't climbed them or even seen them up close? http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qJ-br2islIA/TZTu3E1aFgI/AAAAAAAAAfQ/IV6cnZtXTzI/s1600/Skyrim_CompositeMountain.jpg is the most we've seen of Skyrims mountains and that definitely doesn't look small scale or 'gimmicky'.
Like others have said, have you thought about consoles before saying that BGS spend too much time on graphics? Would you rather Skyrim look the same as Arena?
If you've ever lived in the mountains you'd know there's no way skyrim's mountains are even close to life sized. That composite picture you posted gives no sense of scale. But compare these two pictures:
http://cms.elderscrolls.com/sites/default/files/tes/screenshots/DragonMountains_wLegal.jpg
http://www.citypictures.org/data/media/222/The_Dolomites_Alps_Italy.jpg
Notice that one of those pictures has a few dozen trees, while the other has thousands of trees at the base of the mountain. The mountains in Skyrim will look bigger than they actually are because Beth is using some creative fogging and DOF techniques. But there's a very good reason that the mountains aren't like real mountains - there's no way you could fit Skyrim with realistic mountains into a 16 square mile game world.