Why can't something that is heavily implied to be extinct remain extinct? Why does it 'have' to be brought back? Especially when bringing it back means modelers, programmers, scripters, audio recording and animators has to spend time working on it rather than a new mutant all together. I'd much rather see a new type of mutant than forcing Wanamingo's back into existence for no good reason.
Seriously, why can't something that is implied very heavily to be extinct remain extinct? Because "heavily implied" doesn't mean "confirmed"? That's a bad reason to me. Because if they could be created one then they could be recreated? For what purpose? We got Nightstalkers and Cazador's out of Big Mountain. Two new types of enemies. Why can't the place where wanamingo's were created be responsible for something 'new' instead? Fine, wherever Wanamingo's came from we have no idea if they could be recreated or not so fine, it leaves it open to them being recreated. I'm just saying I don't get the point of it when we could have a new mutant instead.
I mean, it's like when a villain or hero "dies" in Marvel, why can't the character just stay dead? Why not build up new characters? Why does the same character have to be rehashed? How many times will the character be rehashed? When will it actually be over?
It's not totally completely 100 % absolutely confirmed without the shadow of a doubt that they are extinct and gone forever, so let's rehash them. You know what would be a great idea? If we rehash Enclave again too. And Super Mutants. And FEV. And Optimus Prime. None of it is totally completely 100 % absolutely confirmed that they can't return en masse so that means we should rehash them too.
How many times are we going to rehash things though? When will it actually stop?