I want clear definition of what will be considered an aimbot

Post » Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:24 pm

Presumably by Fellblade or whoever is going to be overseeing/judging the videos. I have allot of video that is obvious lock on aimbots but I dont see those players often. On the other hand I have allot of better hacker video where they dont really lock onto the head it just fires one bullet at the head always in a clutch situation where they really need to get kills"aka instant toggles" by the better more established hackers when their aim is nowhere near that good and is only when they really need the kills. I know they are aimbot shots but im sure crytek wont see it that way. So what will be considered an aimbot and what won't. I'm not gonna waste my time only for crytek to try to build a case against me saying im paranoid. I want what will be interpreted as an aimbot defined. Which will most likely be continuous headshot locks which is not how I think aimbots work anymore which will probably necessitate me or someone else installing one of these things to prove that continuous lock aimbots are not the current state of aimbot technology and therefore an antiquated way of detecting them(which I already know to be the case from personal experience in this game, but of course because others are ignorant this will have to be proven). I have tons of video.
User avatar
Nicholas C
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:20 am

Post » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:34 pm

No discussion of anticheat definitions or "testing" of hacks will be forthcoming in public forum, sorry.
User avatar
MatthewJontully
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:33 am


Return to Crysis