I have yet to fire any shoulder fired weapon that can reliably get more than two rounds in full-auto in a man sized target at normal engagement range before the recoil takes you off target. Not saying there aren't any, but I sure haven't seen any.
I dunno, I can rapid fire my Marlin 60 without much noticeable recoil, especially of the muzzle climb variety, and it's scoped. I suppose it depends on the range and the size of your target too, obviously the effects of recoil on your aim, obviously the longer the range the more recoil would effect your POI.
@.46ACP hey man what about a sniper rifle that shoots 5 bullets at the exact same time? The first shot is basically the only shot you need then... could that be done? cause that would be the most absolute sickest looking gun ever made or would the recoil from it basically tear your shoulder off of your body?
I'm much more of a WWI WWII rifle guy, but my understanding of current weapons is that some have a selector that enables a super fast cyclic rate of fire for the first 2 rounds, then slows down after that. What you basically get is two bullets leaving the barrel so close together that recoil forces don't have a chance to move your point of aim.
Also, I believe I recall some of the http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8hlj4EbdsE with cyclic rates so fast the they accomplish the same as above, but by firing off a number of stacked rounds at the same time.
-Gunny out.
The AN-94 has such a system (2 round burst, 1 round recoil), if I recall. And yeah, I was thinking metal storm too, stacking the bullets in the barrel and firing them using EMP.
Oh, well in my mind, I categorize sniper rifles as using some of the higher calibers 7.62, .338 etc. and lower calibers like 5.56 as Marksman or Assault Rifles, but thats just my mind. Also, I wouldn't mind seeing the .408 in-game, but I guess it's too late for that.
That's generally true of western weapons, but remember what gunny said, a sniper rifle refers to an application rather than a particular design, although certain rifles are especially designed for that application. So when you think of a sniper rifle you're more accurately thinking of a "sniper's rifle", a rifle that a sniper might typically use. And really, a marksman is also a sniper in a way, because when you think about it, a marksman is sniping when he shoots his rifle, by definition.
But that's the problem- the whole thing becomes a mess of technicalities and semantics when you start to really deconstruct it. What defines a sniper rifle even depends on the doctrine of the forces using it. I've discussed this many times before in arguments over whether the SVD (Dragunov) is a sniper rifle or a designated marksman rifle. One argument is that a marksman rifle is not accurate enough to be considered a true sniper rifle- the Dragunov, it is argued, is too inaccurate and too limited in range to be a true sniper rifle- the same argument is used when classifying intermediate caliber rifles as marksman rifles, however, the round the Dragunov fires, 7.62x54r, is by all means a full sized round.
And here's where the doctrine issue comes in. SVD stands for Snayperskaya Vintovka Dragunova, meaning "Dragunov's sniper rifle". So it's a sniper rifle then, right? Case closed, right? Well, not really. You see, Soviet doctrine at the time the weapon was designed didn't really account for the classic idea of the Sniper, a concealed, low profile shooter, usually with a spotter, who hides in shadows and takes out HVTs at his discretion or on direct command, despite the fact that such Snipers were used to great effect during the Great Patriotic War. The idea of a sniper in this doctrine more resembles our idea of a Designated Marksman, basically a guy with a scoped rifle that can be attatched to a squad and give them a range edge, allowing them to engage at 600m instead of 300m as their AKs and RPKs would allow.
And that's not really different from an American DMR with an M14 among a squad equipped with M16s, M4s, and M249 is it. So is the Dragunov a DMR, or a sniper rifle? Well, it depends on who you ask.
And that's why I'm against being too picky on how you define sniping, and why I think the concept of a full-auto sniper is not impossible- because basically, if you're a military big wig, and you draw up a doctrine that includes a full auto sniper weapon, then it exists, period- and in fiction this is easy as the stroke of a key.