What console are you getting Skyrim for?

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:46 pm

You offend me sir! :slap:
How dare you call my beloved pc a console. Sir for that you should be hanged.
User avatar
Kristina Campbell
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:14 pm

I honestly hope not. That would mean that nothing had been done to take advantage of the 5+ years of Moore's Law that have brought about an 8-16 fold increase in power over that time. But considering Bethesda's past, even the mightiest of PCs will struggle under the weight of Skyrim at its highest settings.
I look forward to having a good excuse to upgrade some hardware.


Oh, I hope not, too. However, Todd has made the comment that all three versions will look just as good as each other. To me, that suggests that the PC won't be getting those significant improvements I'd like to see. Otherwise, it would look far better than the other two versions.
User avatar
Tinkerbells
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:22 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:45 pm

Oh, I hope not, too. However, Todd has made the comment that all three versions will look just as good as each other. To me, that suggests that the PC won't be getting those significant improvements I'd like to see. Otherwise, it would look far better than the other two versions.


God, I hope that's one of those common exaggerations one hears on the topic... That's what they said about Crysis 2 for example, and from Eurogamer's 3-way comparison, its just not the case. Then again, C2 was pretty much neutered on the PC, apparently to keep the consoles from exploding (I was honestly disappointed in how high my framerates were - it meant they really weren't pushing the hardware like they should have been)
User avatar
LuCY sCoTT
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:29 am

Post » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:02 am

PC
:user: :wub:

...can't mod the xbox or ps3 :poke:
User avatar
Niisha
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:58 pm

I honestly hope not. That would mean that nothing had been done to take advantage of the 5+ years of Moore's Law that have brought about an 8-16 fold increase in power over that time. But considering Bethesda's past, even the mightiest of PCs will struggle under the weight of Skyrim at its highest settings.
I look forward to having a good excuse to upgrade some hardware.

Not to discourage anyone from playing on a PC. Any PC would have to be a real piece of crap not to seriously outperform the ancient hardware in a console. The PC I had when the PS3 came out already did that, and it was pretty cheap.



Oblivion was horribly inefficient and as a result used more than 2x the resources than an equivalent program does nowadays. Skyrim can and will look and run better on the same hardware that you used for Oblivion.
User avatar
kat no x
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:39 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:21 pm

God, I hope that's one of those common exaggerations one hears on the topic... That's what they said about Crysis 2 for example, and from Eurogamer's 3-way comparison, its just not the case. Then again, C2 was pretty much neutered on the PC, apparently to keep the consoles from exploding (I was honestly disappointed in how high my framerates were - it meant they really weren't pushing the hardware like they should have been)


That's pretty much what I am expecting. The PC version will look better. How could it not with higher res textures and AA (which are confirmed)? I don't expect it to push anywhere near what the PC hardware is capable of handling, though.
User avatar
R.I.p MOmmy
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:40 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:38 pm

(...) But if you don't plan to buy PC for any reason, don't buy PS3 either. If you have ever read EuroGamer's 'Digital Foundry' articles which compare PS3 and X360 graphics, the result usually is that PS3 version of multiplatform games runs worst. They look slightly worse (blurry textures, more pixelated shadows etc.) and run little slower in most cases. The different is barely noticeable in fast gaming session, but you can definetly see the dramatic framerate drops which PS3 has in many multiplatform games.(...)

Well you're right, games that are developed for XBOX360 and converted to PS3 afterwards are like you said. Of course there are exceptions. Mass Effect 2 for example was ten times better on PS3 than on XBOX360.
If a game is developed for both consoles (and Skyrim is developed for both) then there won't be an issue.

Just because some game engines aren't optimized for PS3 and the game developers didn't spent much time optimizing it doesn't mean every game engine is that way.
User avatar
RObert loVes MOmmy
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:12 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:50 pm

The visuals and overall game will be much better on PC. At the same time, the game will still be worthy on the 360.
User avatar
Wane Peters
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:25 am

Well you're right, games that are developed for XBOX360 and converted to PS3 afterwards are like you said. Of course there are exceptions. Mass Effect 2 for example was ten times better on PS3 than on XBOX360.
If a game is developed for both consoles (and Skyrim is developed for both) then there won't be an issue.

Just because some game engines aren't optimized for PS3 and the game developers didn't spent much time optimizing it doesn't mean every game engine is that way.


Problem is, at its core the PS3 is very different in nature re program flow and structure from any other system. That's why PS3 native titles look and perform better than multiplatform titles. From what I've gotten from developers is that coding for the PS3 is both very different and decidedly harder than coding for any other platform.
The Xbox uses an IBM PowerPC chip, the PPC's being an old and established line of processors - meaning that coders are used to the instruction sets, workflow and such.
The CellBE chip in a PS3 is a PPC with a few other chips build onto it. Those other "chips" (stream processors) work very differently, and if your code isn't built from the ground up with that in mind, the final product will suffer. Multiplatform games are rarely if ever handled like that, and so PS3 performance suffers.
The best way to do it would be to effectively write the game engine 3 times - once per system. Obviously nobody wants to do that, it would be too expensive and time consuming. The next best option is to write it only for the PC and to tell console users to upgrade. but not enough people agree with me on that. In fact, I'll probably take a lot of heat for even making the joke.
User avatar
Dagan Wilkin
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:20 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:03 pm

I got my computer built for me on I buy power; it's an excellent online company. You choose the computer parts you want individually and they construct it. I got mine last year, spent 700, and, have been able to run game I own on the highest settings. For Skyrim, I'm probably going to have to buy the second graphics card I configured for but didn't get. It's a good compromise if you know computers, but don't feel confident enough to build it yourself. (Obviously I was happy with the result or I would sound like an advert.)
User avatar
Philip Rua
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:53 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:30 pm

Well you're right, games that are developed for XBOX360 and converted to PS3 afterwards are like you said. Of course there are exceptions. Mass Effect 2 for example was ten times better on PS3 than on XBOX360.
If a game is developed for both consoles (and Skyrim is developed for both) then there won't be an issue.

Just because some game engines aren't optimized for PS3 and the game developers didn't spent much time optimizing it doesn't mean every game engine is that way.

Well they already said that Skyrim would look the same on all platforms and slightly better on PC because anti-aliasing or something.

so it'll look the same on both consoles hopefully. as a 360 owner i wouldn't want 360 to look better than PS3, even though in some cases when a game is developed on 360 that seems to happen.

so lets just hope they look GREAT on both consoles, because they are both gonna look the same (hopefully).
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:57 pm

Won't be getting this for my PS3. There's no way I could play this game on anything but a PC. Not simply because the graphics will be far better (Fallout: New Vegas jaggies were horrible. Decent anti-aliasing is a must) but mainly because the modding community added SO much for games like Oblivion and FO3. I can't miss out on that.
User avatar
Kerri Lee
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:37 pm

Post » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:12 am

To play skyrim max you need to spent 600 well spent pounds on a computer. Dont forget the MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS
User avatar
abi
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 7:17 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:04 pm

To play skyrim max you need to spent 600 well spent pounds on a computer. Dont forget the MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS

Speculation, and unfounded at that. Skyrim has given no indication of being particularly hard on your PC, and as my ~£350 PC currently maxes out just about everything it seems unlikely you would have to spend double that to max skyrim.
User avatar
Sakura Haruno
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:22 pm

If you've ever seen Oblivion runing at 1920*1080 with a full set of 4096*4096 hi-res textures with 200+ plus mods added, you'll know why you shouldn't touch Skyrim with a console :) As Bethesda have said they will include hi-res textures in the PC version it should look graphically superior from the off on a PC even before the modding community completely re-write the game! You'll need a Phenom X2 quad core or better, an ATI 4870 or better, and at least 4gig of DDR3 Ram. Hope this is useful.....


I don't own a console, but I'm actually looking forward to playing Skyrim unmodded, at least for a time. And my characters still pause to look around when they first emerge from the hold of the ship at the beginning of Morrowind, because the wonder is still there. I'm glad that you take pleasure in his-res textures you use, but for at least some of us art style has a lot more impact. I still love the look of Heroes of Might and Magic II ...
User avatar
Steph
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:44 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:14 pm

Seriously how many of these threads will be made. I for one am getting the PS3 version because my PS really devoted fan mentallity prevents me from buying on 360. LOL joking, I just prefer the controller and I want to get the platinum trophy. I will how ever end up with all three versions eventually.
User avatar
Cayal
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:24 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:28 pm

I wish they had compatible PS3 controllers. I like them and I find the 360 ones uncomfortable.

The controllers are IMO one of the few things xbox did better than ps3.

OT: I would save up some money to buy a decent computer to play it on. But that's just me.
User avatar
Abel Vazquez
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:25 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:35 pm

The controllers are IMO one of the few things xbox did better than ps3.

Not everyone agrees with that. Some people have small hands and prefer using a smaller controller. I for one don't like the bulkyness of the 360 controller. People with bigger hands tend to like 360 controller better. I for one have a difficult time adjusting to new controller design since I went from NES to SNES to PS which are all very similar in a way so I have gotten used to the design and I prefer it over all others. Another great controller is the Wii Classic controller pro, which I also like better than 360's controller.
User avatar
Mistress trades Melissa
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:28 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:03 pm

Xbox for me.

Then i can lounge on the sofa with the wireless controller and play it on the big screen TV :thumbsup:
User avatar
Baylea Isaacs
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:19 pm

ill be getting it for 360
User avatar
Donatus Uwasomba
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 7:22 pm

Post » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:14 am

360 and PC (360 first, because I need to upgrade my pc before I can even think about playing any games, I can barely play morrowind with my dinky little graphics card >_>.....)
User avatar
Meghan Terry
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:53 am

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:35 am

My (ranked) reasons for choosing PC:

1. I like using keyboard and mouse. I hate using joystick, it's really hard and annoying in 1st person games (I play TES 1st person always) I think.

2. Playing games on PC feels more serious. More immersive. Like you really dwell into the world much more. Playing on consoles feel less serious and more casual. I've always liked being serious and really go all in with games (and practically everything else I do as well). So therefore I like PC a lot more because of this.

3. I like to use mods. They can fix flaws and expand the game.

4. I like the ability to have everything under my control. I get that through settings and such on the PC.

5. I've also grown up with a PC and is used to it much more... so that probably plays a part in the role of what I like as well.
User avatar
Ria dell
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:03 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:52 pm

Yep. The PS3 and 360 look largely the same. A high end PC will kick both their arses, but is unlikely to look too different to the 360 version.

The reason to go for the PC version is the mods, not the graphics imo.


I agree here. Even though I use a PS3 myself, I have tasted the juicy delights of modding. Bethesda are creating Skyrim to look exactly the same on all three platforms, no questions whatsoever. But when it comes down to pure content, the PC version blows both consoles away. So go for that if you can afford it. The next best I would have to say is PS3, but only because I own both the 360 and PS3 and favour that over the 360.
User avatar
Lisha Boo
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:56 pm

Post » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:33 am

I think upgrading your pc is a good investment and not just for Skyrim. I am actually buying a really nice $600 computer from a friend. This machine is ridiculous.... and a serious upgrade to my monitor as well. :)

For our household though... I am buying the special edition for the PC (assuming there is one...), as well as a PS3 copy and Xbox 360 so everyone in the house can play at the same time without blood shed. ;P
User avatar
Jessie Butterfield
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:59 pm

Post » Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:28 pm

Xbox 360 all the way baby!!!
User avatar
brian adkins
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim

cron