Reiterating my point: We need flamethrowers for Heavy types. And don't give me that "well you want it to be one kill or have the burn last 10 seconds inflicting 10% a second.

No, you're wrong. What I want is a functional support flamethrower. I want to use it like a secondary weapon. Trust me, theres plenty of ways this could work.

The Rhett assault rifle looks like a AK47, no? Look it up on the Brink Wiki, pals - ''is that a ak47?'' was my first thought when I saw it, so.. LOOK IT UP DAMNIT, GOGOGOGO NO TIME TO LOSE! GOGO WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INTERNET TO JUST OOGLE AT NOTHING!

I hate guns with the magazine behind the trigger. They look unwieldy and awkward.

They do have a mission to blow up a reactor, don't they? Sounds like terrorism to me.

Considering the "Resistance" are a group of people who came unwelcomed to the Ark, and are now trying to take it's resources for themselves, they seem inappropriately named. They're not resisting against some occupying force, they are one.

But look at the front of it, man!

Check the beginning of the Choir of Guns Trailer also The Irish guy weilds it with a grip

They either stand up for themselves, or die.

Refugees are dying from starvation, sickness and being generally overworked by doing the jobs nobody wants to do.

The ark is apparently running low on resources.

The founders seem to be hoarding water.

They want to escape the Ark, because it seems like the security are only delaying the inevitable. Even if they have some sort of plan to give everybody water. They don't know if they have one and they still have families that are dying.




It could work. But it's a bit late for that now. Maybe for DLC.

Figures someone named napalm would want this

JORRG is saying he doesn't like bullpups at all, which includes Barret M95, FNH F2000, Felin system (FAMAS), Chinese QBZ weapon system, The TAVOR 21, and others, i personally don't like it either, i prefer the M4/M16 system and M14 system, easy to use and reload and i don't like the whole factor of having to feed the weapon behind the sight picture, if it blows up, there goes the side of your face if you survive.

Exactly, the ends justify the means. That's terrorism for ya.

The security can be seen as an oppressive military group aimed at pinning their freedom in the slums. As their means of hoarding water and breaking into doors of every citizen, they're ends justify their means as well.

The resistance have a fitting name. They have to fight for their survival, literally.



I really like the look of that Rhett.

Well, the humorous political answer, and again I'm not taking sides here, would be.... "Republicans?"



I can only assume that was aimed at me, but I should point out that I am not against flamethrowers, simply that when they get included there's major argument over OP/UP. I would love to see one that works and isn't ridiculous (same way I feel about launchers).

It's not the Squirrel's fault the Grasshopper didn't prepare for winter.

Stopping a thief is not being oppressive.

The resistance should be happy for dry land, and learn to fish. Also unless the art of boiling water has been lost to the ages, they've got plenty to drink. Desalination isn't that hard.

Lol! ....Wait. :huh: :hehe:

If you redirect me to a gun place and talk gun-talk to me,
I will tie you up and then torture you by making you watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGawAhRjtoA,
do you understand me? bliviongate:

Anyway, I just saw a new PAX vid and supposedly saw someone using a shotgun. Now the reason I often try to avoid Shotguns
in CoD and Killzone 2 and some other shooters is because they are really close/short-range.

Yet, this "shotgun" takes people out from a like a mid-distance (a pretty good distance), lol. :blink:

Now I want the shotgun! ....But, wait, don't shotguns have slow reloading, too? Oh, phooey! :laugh:

They want to leave the dry land, but the point is, they can't.

They don't have much resources to desalinate on a large scale. The founders do. Even if they did, the founders are still going to hoard their water and mistake the resistance's cure to a disease as a bioweapon. They basically have to fight.

Water on their side is too polluted for good fishing.

:chaos:

shotguns will have slow reload time to balance with high damage output.

You mean having to reload pellets individually or just have it lethargically slow for each pellet?

Here is the http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm50DFqYZ_A with the shotgun.

Is that gun the first guy is using really a shotgun?
Maybe I am mistaking it as another gun?

Yeah. That's a shotty. A lotta hitmarkers with that one. But it has [censored] range. And still decent power.

His concerns about no snipers are partially mistaken because they have light rifles. Which seems somewhat like them in a basic sense.

that is the mossington, it was also buffed as you can see it have glowing orange.

as for the reloading, they are reloading shells one at a time. pellets are in the shell with the primer and powder. if you had to load pellets into the rounds, it will take longer than a black powder rifle from the 1700's to reload it.

The mossington looks like it has a tube magazine so it would probably load each shell individually, though If it's like many other games you might be able to stop the reload animation at any point by shooting.

The heavy shotgun has a revolver style cylinder that could use a speedloader.

I know what you mean. I'll be medium though. A nice medium power shottie would be nice. Like a double barrel. But you'd have to reload constantly, have limited accuracy and range. You'd have to get real close but it often kill with both barrels.

In a sense how? (Remember non-gun person here, lol) Is it because they both have a long distance range? But rifles do not have long-distance scope like the sniper guns?
Ooh, I do like rifles, though.

shotguns actually have a range of 15-30 yards if using a SBS (short barrel shotgun with no choke) however it also depends on what type of shot you are using (slugs, bird shot, 00 buck, 000 buck, less lethal, flechete, HE grenade warheads, etc.) the choke, and the length of the barrel. i have seen people make 150 yard target with slug loaded shotguns (people hunt deer with them too.) when you are bird hunting, you are using smaller and high quantity pellets in bird shot to extend the range to 20- 40 yard shots at ducks.




I am guessing he is using buckshot in the video, if he was using slug shells, it would be only a single slug hitting a target like a rifle, but with buckshot he is able to hit with spread of the larger pellets.

here is a picture of http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Cal12_N%C2%B08.jpg

here is a picture of http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/_thumbs/Images/ammo/ammo_pics/12ga_buckshot.jpg

here is a picture of http://www.gunconsultation.com/SFX/Graphics/12gaSabotSlug01.JPG

Well technically, a sniper does not HAVE to have a scope, but they often do to take advantage of it's accuracy. So, a light rifle is the same in a sense. But is lighter, less powerful than the heavier snipers, but is still a high powered weapon.

Shotguns are often bad at a range. They fire a cluster of pellets, so they spread out over a distance. So they can reach out to those distances, but they aren't the best because they are innaccurate.

I consider inaccurate to be inaccurate. It's just that the spread of the pellets leaves the majority spreading out beyond the focal point.

correct but they are able to hit the target due to the spread of the cluster, think of spray paint the farther the bigger the spread, closer is more concentrated. you are still able to hit the wall but the effectiveness is just reduced.