What If Skyrim is Steam Exclusive?

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:28 pm

I prefer my disc and box.


@Anthropoid, if you do a version 2 of this poll, it might be good to clarify that it's not only about digi-distribution but the retail version as well.
User avatar
Ashley Hill
 
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:27 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:46 pm

Where's the "I'd prefer a Steam-only DRM?" >: (
User avatar
El Khatiri
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:43 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:48 pm

Where's the "I'd prefer a Steam-only DRM?" >: (

:wink:
:foodndrink:
User avatar
jesse villaneda
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:37 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:08 am

Heck no. I'm sorry, I'm no marketing major but I work at JCP and that would be very stupid marketing on their part. Their sales would be a small little bar if crap. I can't see Bethesda doing something that insane.
User avatar
courtnay
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:49 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:20 pm

Heck no. I'm sorry, I'm no marketing major but I work at JCP and that would be very stupid marketing on their part. Their sales would be a small little bar if crap. I can't see Bethesda doing something that insane.

GTA4 sold very well too and you needed not only a steam account, but also one for the social club.
Though I thought that would kill GTA ...well I was wrong then ^^
User avatar
djimi
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:44 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:19 pm

I prefer steam to GFWL, however if it has to be through Steam I hope the install files are on the disk in the box and not download only as it will take me about 2 weeks to dl Skyrim if it is indeed the estimated 20gb (I have no source for that)
User avatar
kelly thomson
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:18 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:37 pm

I am opposed to the game having full Steam integration. However, I am not opposed specifically to Steam. Rather I am opposed to each and every form of online activation. I want a retail copy of the game with a physical disc and which doesn't rely on an internet connection so that I can play the game at my own terms. If a game requires online activation I am at the mercy of whoever is managing that online activation and I do not want to be at anyone's mercy to play my games..


This, nothing against steam specifically (I can see how someone who likes to download games would like it) but why would I want to install and create an account for something I'm never going to use, since I like physical copies, in order to activate a single player offline game?

If it requires one online activasion and is from then on offline, as in not requireing the internet at all, I'll probably still get it. But if it requires being continuingly online just to play I won't get it.
User avatar
~Sylvia~
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:19 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:48 pm

This, nothing against steam specifically (I can see how someone who likes to download games would like it) but why would I want to install and create an account for something I'm never going to use, since I like physical copies, in order to activate a single player offline game?

If it requires one online activation and is from then on offline, as in not requiring the internet at all, I'll probably still get it. But if it requires being continuously online just to play I won't get it.


It's not that you have to be online all the time. It's that you "must" have an internet connection "greater than dial-up and low-speed DSL if you want to play in the next 30 years" for the instillation, after that your good to go. When you install the game, even with auto updates off, steam will auto update the game and will not let you play it till the download is finished "it has to be up to date to work". Even worse is the few "once in a blue moon" games that even if you buy a retail hard disk you must download the whole game over steam "weird huh, although I doubt Beth would do that". So those of us "me included" with no to low speed internet will not be able to play it at all until we can afford a good speed DSL.
User avatar
Far'ed K.G.h.m
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:03 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:46 pm

Heck no. I'm sorry, I'm no marketing major but I work at JCP and that would be very stupid marketing on their part. Their sales would be a small little bar if crap. I can't see Bethesda doing something that insane.
It would help if you read some of the thread and understood the discussion before declaring it insane.

Bethesda did exactly this with New Vegas and seems to have money coming out their ears from that release.
User avatar
IsAiah AkA figgy
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:43 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:06 am

Just to let folks know, this is the steam DRM it actually makes the game unique to you more or less.

http://www.steampowered.com/steamworks/publishingservices.php

I don't see why people hate steam so much other than being forced to join it and it's not like you guys can't use steam as you are all replying to these posts.

I'm still confused as to why people hate steam so much, in Japan(got a friend that lives there) it's all Digital Download, or nearly exclusively so.
User avatar
Joanne Crump
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:44 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:20 pm


I don't see why people hate steam so much other than being forced to join it and it's not like you guys can't use steam as you are all replying to these posts.

I'm still confused as to why people hate steam so much, in Japan(got a friend that lives there) it's all Digital Download, or nearly exclusively so.


these boards aren't a problem for someone with a 56k connection, being forced to dl a huge 1+gb or more over 56k just to play a single-player game that came on a disc, that's a pain.

Japan as a small densely populated country is probably in a different situation than say big ol' spread out America that while has densely populated areas also has areas with very low density.

also I'm really not a fan of some of Steam's features in terms of it being used for single-player games like the forced patching on game installation.

but I don't hate Steam in of itself, Steamworks on the other hand IMO is a bad idea.
User avatar
renee Duhamel
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:12 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:22 pm

I'm a fan of Steam, but as far as Elder Scrolls/Fallout games are concerned I prefer to have standalone retail copies so that I can just jump in and out of the game whenever I want. Plus, it's easier on the modders when there's less subdirectories you have to plow through before you reach the game's data files.

But regardless, I would buy Skyrim. I shall follow it TO THE DEATH! :batman:
User avatar
Kat Ives
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:11 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:46 pm

I'm still confused as to why people hate steam so much, in Japan(got a friend that lives there) it's all Digital Download, or nearly exclusively so.


Hate steam, people don't hate Steam, they hate to be forced to install a 3rd party application that require online authentication to use their offline single player games.

Also, I buy my games almost exclusively as digital downloads and I haven't bought a single one in the Steam store. Unlike what some Steam lovers believe, Steam isn't the only digital download shop available and others are a lot lest restrictive when it come to install and patch our game.
User avatar
Alister Scott
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:56 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:06 pm

Hate steam, people don't hate Steam, they hate to be forced to install a 3rd party application that require online authentication to use their offline single player games.

Also, I buy my games almost exclusively as digital downloads and I haven't bought a single one in the Steam store. Unlike what some Steam lovers believe, Steam isn't the only digital download shop available and others are a lot lest restrictive when it come to install and patch our game.

Don't single us out, I use Direct 2 Drive and GOG as well on top of some other stuff, not piracy mind you like the EA Store and such.


ok, so a 56k connection is a reasonable rebuttal to not wanting to use but I'm pretty sure most of the US has access to some form of High Speed Connection.
User avatar
Bonnie Clyde
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:02 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:16 pm

I can't counter anything you said, but I would remind you that DRM has more purposes than merely preventing privacy.

DRM must be included with the software in order for the publisher to claim certain legal rights and protections. The law doesn't require that the DRM be absolutely effective, but it has to be a good faith attempt at a DRM solution for those legal rights to be enforceable. Bethesda couldn't just put a simple disc check and call it done because they would know that was completely ineffective.

DRM is also important because the company has a fiduciary responibility to protect the best interests of their shareholders. Failure to do all they can to protect their legal property would open them up to lawsuits from their own owners.


A little confused here. Steam as DRM has been proven ineffective, but that's okay because at least they tried. Disc Check DRM has been proven ineffective, and therefore cannot be used. Is there something I'm missing?

As to the share holders, I'd just say "Well we can spend millions of dollars on an intricate form of internet DRM that, ironically, can be easily bypassed by anyone with an internet connection. Or we can put that money back into the project for development/advertising/merchandising."
User avatar
Chris BEvan
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:40 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:09 pm

A little confused here. Steam as DRM has been proven ineffective, but that's okay because at least they tried. Disc Check DRM has been proven ineffective, and therefore cannot be used. Is there something I'm missing?
If it was a recently developed, actively supported disc check function it would suffice. A "simple disc check" the way it used to be done is so out of date that it can't really be said to be a real attempt to protect the product. It obviously doesn't have to be Steamworks as a lot of companies have DRM software that can be licensed, but it has to be something still being supported.

As to the share holders, I'd just say "Well we can spend millions of dollars on an intricate form of internet DRM that, ironically, can be easily bypassed by anyone with an internet connection. Or we can put that money back into the project for development/advertising/merchandising."
I suppose if you got them to sign off on it ahead of time that would be fine. Unfortunately, the most likely place for you to be saying that would be in court while defending yourself from the lawsuit. Of course, if your company is bringing in enough money the shareholders won't bother you....until things go bad and then they'll sue you.

Yeah, I'm a cynic about investors.
User avatar
helliehexx
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:45 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:20 am

I prefer a no steam version for a single player game with no multiplayer even though I have decent internet. My attitude greatly changed when Australia was charged nearly double for FO:NV compared to the US even though the Australian dollar is at parity with he greenback. This is despite buying from a US site and paying in US dollars.
User avatar
Beth Belcher
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:39 pm

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:01 am

Steam's prices in Australia are supposed to match the retail price for the game in Australia. Steam is not out to destroy the publishers other distribution channels by undercutting the retailer.

Except during their big sales, of course.
User avatar
Luis Longoria
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:21 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:07 pm

Steam = no buy , i didn't bought civ5 for same reason , it is also boring killing executables and i already had to take impulse out.

One time on line activation is okay for me but securom kind of [censored] is unacceptable .
User avatar
sunny lovett
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:51 pm

I will not buy a game if it needs online activation, once or continually. I've easily chosen not to play games due to the publishers use of DRM, which includes F3. I play a game to relax, not to get frustrated over things not working like they should.

I use an off-line machine for my gaming. If I can't play Skyrim that way, I'll just go back to playing Morrowind and The Witcher. Easy as that.
User avatar
Sophie Miller
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 12:35 am

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:47 pm

We have reached the 10th page of the umpteenth thread about Steam.

Every possible permutation of any conceivable argument under the sun for Steam DRM or against Steam DRM has already been made. Numerous times.

Some people hate steam, some people love it and some just DGAF. Some fans might not buy Skyrim if it is bundled with Steam DRM, many will buy it anyways.

Please for the love of God nobody start any more threads or polls about this crap.

If you wan't the Bethesda folks to know your opinion, trust me they have already heard it by now.
User avatar
Isabell Hoffmann
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:09 pm

I will buy it regardless, because Steam is not the evil people make it out to be. Most of the arguments against it fall flat under the lightest of scrutiny because they're underpinned by nothing other than "Steam is popular, and in computer circles popular is uncool, therefore I don't like Steam". Much like the arguments against Facebook. The only genuine reason I can think of people being against Steam exclusive is internet connectivity concerns.
User avatar
Laura-Lee Gerwing
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:46 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:11 am

A little confused here. Steam as DRM has been proven ineffective,[...]

Copy protection, yes. DRM, no. Steam is still effectively locking your key to your account. At any rate, we've really passed the point where any opinion on this board can be read in another Steam thread. ^_^
User avatar
Kayla Keizer
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:31 pm

Post » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:46 pm

Copy protection, yes. DRM, no. Steam is still effectively locking your key to your account. At any rate, we've really passed the point where any opinion on this board can be read in another Steam thread. ^_^


QFT

If Skyrim is Steam only and you have a 56k connection, but still want Skyrim for PC.... BUY THE RETAIL DISC AND USE THAT TO INSTALL. Yes you have to be online for verification of the install, but that is the case most of the time for games now days.

You can use the disc to install as often as you want.
User avatar
Kristian Perez
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:03 am

Post » Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:28 am

QFT

If Skyrim is Steam only and you have a 56k connection, but still want Skyrim for PC.... BUY THE RETAIL DISC AND USE THAT TO INSTALL. Yes you have to be online for verification of the install, but that is the case most of the time for games now days.

You can use the disc to install as often as you want.


nope because any huge patch is still mandatory on installation.

waiting for round 2 of this thread :whistling:
User avatar
MatthewJontully
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:33 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim