I would probably roll Chaotic Good, it just fits Dovakiin.
How about you?
Why?

Had to go chaotic evil cause I tend to lean towards the sneaking assassin type then once I'm high enough level I like to run around towns on killing sprees. Yeah I'm a sick bastard sometimes but it can be fun
My first character though will probably be neutral good.

Either lawful evil or lawful neutral.

What do all these words mean?

This might help: http://nwn2.wikia.com/wiki/Alignment

For me, it was really a toss-up between Lawful Evil and Chaotic Good. Over all, though, Chaotic Good wins. :angel: I like to have both a halo and horns.

Thanks. It did.

Don't know yet.

My Nord will be a good guy

Chaotic good, I guess, since my Argonian is an anti-hero.

Chaotic Neutral is the only way to roll.

Chaotic neutral. Do what I want when I want.

Lawful good. Though that's what I'll start off as it will probably change to neutral good.

Something between chaotic good and lawful neutral seems right. My character doesn't always obey the rules or laws, and sometimes acts with selfish abandon, but is not malicious, and generally does much more to help people than to harm them.

I have three characters;

Imperial Rogue- Neutral good/ true neutral
Nordic Mercenary- Lawful Evil
Breton Mage- Chaotic Neutral

I like to leave room for my characters to grow and change during gameplay.

Chaotic neutral for me too.

I can't vote on this...

All I know is, Drallam will !@#$ you up if you wrong him. And he doesn't like Argon's for good reason.

Chaotic neutral for my dunmer nightblade.

Neutral Good or Lawful Good for me.

I chose "Other" on the poll. My alignment is "Truth".

I do not believe that the alignment chart is an accurate system. Excluding the three "Evil" brackets, I fit the criteria for all alignments, which shouldnt be possible according to the Alignment's rules, lol. Good is not determined by compulsive holiness, nor is lawfullness determined by mindless adherence (you can reject "false" laws, and still be lawful in character). Also, Evil is simply the rejection of truth in favor of self gratification; this can take the form of rejecting another's existence by murder. Good should be defined as the "mindful" acceptance of Truth, favoring the gratification of relationship. Law is easily corrupted by evil through the manipulation of words and their definitions. When this truth is lost, good is no longer strong enough to survive. There is no good without truth; even evil men seek out truth before warping it in their favor, effectively abasing themselves in the "pleasure of good", stolen from others.

Law and Chaos, Good and Evil. Neutrality. These ideas try to convey an illusion that each is equal to the other and form a balance. I see it as a trap, so I will have no part in it.

I do as I see fit. Besides, only very few games have I ever felt the need to align myself with either good vs evil and that was because it altered gameplay in some significant way, like aesthetics/apparel, abilities, quest results, etc. Games like Fable 1, or Star Wars KOTOR do it very well.

Not expecting anything quite so in depth here. It also depends on how well they do the NPC's this time. In Oblivion my mind simply converted all the NPC's into annoying treasure chests with legs. So Ill just play it as I go this time.

This is not Dungeons and Dragons.

Neutral Good? I mean would that be correct considering he steals from everyone equally but, will help people out if they're in trouble. I really never put a label on my morality though usually just did what I felt was right what ever that may be. Only constant thing I do, do is steal from everyone.

Chaotic good, I think.

'Alignments' are stupid. Suffice to say that none of my characters will see themselves as 'evil'.