What do you think about athlete salaries?

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:05 pm

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's not like I'm paying them.

What goes around comes around. I know that sentence usually has a different meaning, but it's applicable for money as well.
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:36 pm

It's highly confusing why humans pay more for entertainment than for more.. "essential" things.

Nonetheless, my only guess is the elasticity of the service provided being non-essential causes the price to go where it does both regarding service cost and labour. This happens with more unnecessary tangible things too, like gold, which aren't necessary yet price is highly dependent upon the flavour of the day, or in this case, decade.

Because this sounds like a moral question, I'll say no. However, regarding athletes, the team management, who write their checks, seem to think otherwise.
User avatar
Averielle Garcia
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:41 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:05 pm

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's not like I'm paying them.

No, but your taxes pay for their stadiums. The players getting paid less and that extra money going into funding is obviously unreasonable.
User avatar
Kirsty Collins
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:54 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:26 pm

It's highly confusing why humans pay more for entertainment than for more.. "essential" things.

Panem et circenses.
User avatar
Rebecca Dosch
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:39 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:33 pm

No, but your taxes pay for their stadiums. The players getting paid less and that extra money going into funding is obviously unreasonable.

Yup, that's true. Ask the NHL's Phoenix Coyotes and the city of Glendale + taxpayers about that.
User avatar
Ruben Bernal
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:58 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:20 pm

http://dailyfun.us/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/game-over-nerds-vin.jpg


That was genius. Also, very true. :foodndrink:
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:20 pm

No, but your taxes pay for their stadiums. The players getting paid less and that extra money going into funding is obviously unreasonable.


Or we could actually not build things that we can't afford.
User avatar
marina
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:47 pm

No, I don't think they do, but I think the problem is even worse with actors. At least athletes have to maintain a diet and workout hard, actors just show up, and play make-believe (basically).
User avatar
Quick Draw III
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:27 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:15 pm

Or we could actually not build things that we can't afford.

Depends on the definition of "afford". If you mean cash is king and nothing else is acceptable, well, that won't work for the high 90% of people, particularly for expensive things like cars, tuition, and houses.
User avatar
Austin England
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:16 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:38 pm

I'm busting my ass to get an education, and those loafers get paid tens of millions of dollars to throw/kick some balls.

Societal values and priorities are effed up.
User avatar
Setal Vara
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:49 pm

compensation for all the drugs and abuse they put through their bodies... still too much.
User avatar
Danny Warner
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:26 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:42 pm

Depends on the definition of "afford". If you mean cash is king and nothing else is acceptable, well, that won't work for the high 90% of people, particularly for expensive things like cars, tuition, and houses.


I mean things that could actually be paid off without raising taxes. (impossible I know)
User avatar
Bloomer
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:11 am

No, I don't think they do, but I think the problem is even worse with actors. At least athletes have to maintain a diet and workout hard, actors just show up, and play make-believe (basically).


I kinda agree with this but I do think they get paid to much.
User avatar
Richard Thompson
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:49 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:49 pm

I mean things that could actually be paid off without raising taxes. (impossible I know)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_NFL_season#Labor_dispute So yes, it's impossible.
User avatar
Minako
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:31 pm

On one hand they get paid a ridiculous amount for a few hours work at the top levels, especially the superstars.

On the other hand, being a professional athlete is a massive gamble. You've probably let your real job emplyabily skills and experience go and you're always one injury - one bad break, one bad landing, one tackle - away from a career killing injury and possible pauperhood.
User avatar
phil walsh
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:46 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:30 am

Funny how athletes make more money than presidents.
User avatar
Rob Davidson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:52 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:00 pm

No. Listen. No.

Do you know how much Baseball players make? Hundreds of millions of dollars a year, no hyperbole at all either.

Do you know how much 99.9999999999999999999999999999% of the population of the entire world will make compared to that? Not even half a million dollars in a lifetime.


On the other hand, being a professional athlete is a massive gamble. You've probably let your real job emplyabily skills and experience go and you're always one injury - one bad break, one bad landing, one tackle - away from a career killing injury and possible pauperhood.


Because the $50,000,000 they earned last year just won't cut it to see them through the rest of their life.
User avatar
djimi
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:44 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:15 pm

I mean things that could actually be paid off without raising taxes. (impossible I know)

In the US, that would be circumvented by issuing bonds and placing one's self in a bottomless pit of debt, which ends up much worse later on than raising taxes, thanks to interest accumulation. ;)

Unfortunately this problem goes into teams as well who, in several North American leagues (NFL, NHL, MLB, NBA), team owners and the management that represent them were more than willing to spend themselves well in the red knowing full well they'd be bailed out by taxpayers.. of those teams where profit was of no concern. Indeed it does get worse when athletes wind up on "taxpayer" payroll.
User avatar
kitten maciver
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:36 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:08 pm

in the days of the roman empire their only reward was that they'd get to live another day... i think that's more fair than how much current day athletes get paid
User avatar
Sharra Llenos
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:09 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:33 pm

Excruciatingly overpaid. I don't support professional sports in any way, shape, or form. I don't watch them and I don't buy tickets for them. The reason they get paid such a ridiculous amount is because people are stupidly spending ridiculous amounts of money on their merchandise, on game seats, and giving many hours watching it live. If you think they get paid too much, but still spend ridiculous amounts of money on game seats and merchandise then you are being a bit hypocritical, because you are the reason they are getting paid those ridiculous amounts.

On the other hand, being a professional athlete is a massive gamble. You've probably let your real job emplyabily skills and experience go and you're always one injury - one bad break, one bad landing, one tackle - away from a career killing injury and possible pauperhood.

That was their career choice. If they didn't get a good education, are incapable of getting a good job doing anything else, and were frivilous with their money -- They deserve to have a hard time
User avatar
Bad News Rogers
 
Posts: 3356
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:37 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:04 am

in the days of the roman empire their only reward was that they'd get to live another day... i think that's more fair than how much current day athletes get paid

So you'd have sports in which people can easily die every single day? That's... visionary.
User avatar
Jonathan Montero
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:34 pm

In the US, that would be circumvented by issuing bonds and placing one's self in a bottomless pit of debt, which ends up much worse later on than raising taxes, thanks to interest accumulation. ;)

Unfortunately this problem goes into teams as well who, in several North American leagues (NFL, NHL, MLB, NBA), team owners and the management that represent them were more than willing to spend themselves well in the red knowing full well they'd be bailed out by taxpayers.. of those teams where profit was of no concern. Indeed it does get worse when athletes wind up on "taxpayer" payroll.


Because we aren't already in debt :P
User avatar
Maria Leon
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:39 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:58 pm

What do you think about this? I mean, the players of the NBA and NFL themselves are paid well in the multi millions if they are stars, which is not including the endorsemants they get. I don't even want to know how much Peyton Manning and LeBron James and Michael Jordan make a year. Do you think that these people, who are paid for playing a game, deserve such large amounts of money?


It's [censored], they don't deserve that kind of money just for playing a game. Then again, the corporations who sponsor them get even more for doing LESS, so the exploitation extends far beyond just the players.
User avatar
Arnold Wet
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:32 am

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:09 pm

No. Listen. No.

Do you know how much Baseball players make? Hundreds of millions of dollars a year, no hyperbole at all either.

Do you know how much 99.9999999999999999999999999999% of the population of the entire world will make compared to that? Not even half a million dollars in a lifetime.




Because the $50,000,000 they earned last year just won't cut it to see them through the rest of their life.

For the elite few, thats true, but what about the hundreds of professional athletes that earn a fraction of that?
User avatar
Clea Jamerson
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:23 pm

Post » Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:00 pm

For the elite few, thats true, but what about the hundreds of professional athletes that earn a fraction of that?

It's still enough to live comfortably for the rest of your life. (But not GLAMOROUS, oh no)

Plus I'm sure the league would still give them pension or injury compensation if they can't work anymore.

What about jobs that don't involve career-ending injuries, but DEATH? Like an astronaut or deep-sea diver.
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games