when will jarl ulfric be named high king?

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:23 am

Oh right I forgot about the further point proving Ulfric's dictatorship.
Not any more than the Empire, Cider. Not any more than the Empire.
User avatar
Catherine N
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:58 pm

Post » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:22 pm

Actually not really, one of the new jarls could run for the office of High King and the imperials never go "They better vote for Elisif because our armies are in their cities" whereas Ulfric does say that.

Ulfric does not actually say that, and they would not run against Elisif who has the support of the empire and its armies anymore than they would against Ulfric, the guy they WILLINGLY sided with to get him to be High King.
User avatar
Cathrin Hummel
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:16 pm

Post » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:24 pm

He's not. He removed the Empire which included having to remove Empire supporting Jarls, as they would keep fighting otherwise. The fact that the Jarls will no doubt support him is simply an unforunate by product of the war. Elisif and Tullius do the exact same thing.


"By-product of war" That's a dictatorship.
User avatar
Flesh Tunnel
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:43 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:58 am

Not any more than the Empire, Cider. Not any more than the Empire.

The Empire doesn't threaten the Imperial Jarls to vote for Elisif, the Jarls can vote for anyone they choose whereas Ulfric literally says "They'll vote for me because my armies are in their holds"
User avatar
JESSE
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:55 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:08 am

"By-product of war" That's a dictatorship.

"It's okay for the god emperor to be our dictators, infact world-dictator, but Skyrim can't be dictated on its own."
User avatar
JESSE
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:55 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:55 am

"By-product of war" That's a dictatorship.

Then Elisif's a dictator then.
User avatar
Jeremy Kenney
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:21 pm

I'm all for a new dlc. If they want somthing for the impirals to do they can fight the elves too I don't see a conflict. I just want an end to the quest.
User avatar
Dewayne Quattlebaum
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:29 pm

Post » Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:40 pm

The Empire doesn't threaten the Imperial Jarls to vote for Elisif, the Jarls can vote for anyone they choose whereas Ulfric literally says "They'll vote for me because my armies are in their holds"
No, the Empire pays Imperial jarls for their votes. That's even talked about in game!
User avatar
Nice one
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:30 am

Post » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:32 pm



Actually not really, one of the new jarls could run for the office of High King and the imperials never go "They better vote for Elisif because our armies are in their cities" whereas Ulfric does say that.




Since any Jarl can run for High King each Jarl has a claim to the throne but Ulfric is making it impossible by having his armies in their holds and essentially threatening them.
How is that threatening. They are there to protect the people. I would know, I punched someone in a city once.

Also, why would Ulfric threaten the new Jarls? They couldn't beat him in the moot anyways, he has no reason to threaten them, in my opinion.
User avatar
c.o.s.m.o
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:59 am

He has a legitimate claim to the throne. By that reason he can't be a dictator. Even if he was...wah? Elisif does the same thing.


No he does not. He must be voted in. Elisif inherited the throne, but at any time could be voted off at a moot... which never has the chance of happening thanks to Ulric's uprising.
User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:48 am

No, the Empire pays Imperial jarls for their votes. That's even talked about in game!

OOH, Bribery! This is true.
User avatar
Vickey Martinez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:03 am

No, the Empire pays Imperial jarls for their votes. That's even talked about in game!

Using money is a perfectly honorable strategy, using an armed force and threatening the Jarls to vote is another thing.
User avatar
Vivien
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:47 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:17 am

No he does not. He must be voted in. Elisif inherited the throne, but at any time could be voted off at a moot... which never has the chance of happening thanks to Ulric's uprising.
I don't think you understand the terminology. He has legitimate claim to be voted in because he defeated the High King in combat. That's the Old Way. The Empire conveniently forgets the past, but the North Remembers.
User avatar
Star Dunkels Macmillan
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:00 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:00 am

Using money is a perfectly honorable strategy, using an armed force and threatening the Jarls to vote is another thing.
Okay now I'm convinced you're trolling. Future troll posts will be reported.
User avatar
Bambi
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:20 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:44 am

I don't think you understand the terminology. He has legitimate claim to be voted in because he defeated the High King in combat. That's the Old Way. The Empire conveniently forgets the past, but the North Remembers.

An old way that hasn't been in effect since the first era.


Okay now I'm convinced you're trolling. Future troll posts will be reported.

I'm not even trolling, because a person can turn down the gold, they can't turn down being threatened.
User avatar
victoria johnstone
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:56 am

Post » Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:06 pm

"It's okay for the god emperor to be our dictators, infact world-dictator, but Skyrim can't be dictated on its own."


The Emperor is not a dictator.
User avatar
Chelsea Head
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:38 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:45 am

No he does not. He must be voted in. Elisif inherited the throne, but at any time could be voted off at a moot... which never has the chance of happening thanks to Ulric's uprising.

Ulfric has a right to the throne because he won the duel and is a Jarl. His right may not be hereditary, but it is still a right. If the empire didn't interfere, either Elisif would have stepped down out of fear of being challenged, or she'd get rofl stomped. Seems harsh, but thats how nords work. In their political system, its legitimate. Ulfric is fighting for his right to the throne same as Elisif.
User avatar
Richus Dude
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:17 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:43 am

Oh right I forgot about the further point proving Ulfric's dictatorship.

Its not dictatorship, theres still a spoy for any jarl to step forward. What the post was talking about was that no one has a chance because of ulfrics actions. Ill give an example-someone comes along and ends world hunger and finds a way to legally get rid of taxes while at the same time find a way for govt to generate revenue. That person is running for president. Because of all the things that person does, no one is gonna be taken as an opponent or be able to wrestle that president spot from said peraon.
Theres a spot for aomeone to run against him, but its basically not smart because theres no chance at this poiny. Its not because of fear or threats, its basically a question that will ne asked. "i freed skyrim of the empires influence, I am in the process of strengthening our land, and planning on invading the thalmor. Also I have the dragonborn who backed me up and fought for a free skyrim which by my actions was set in place. Sooo what have u done that the people of skyrim will chose u over me?".
User avatar
Heather Stewart
 
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:04 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:47 am

The Emperor is not a dictator.
He's using military force to ensure his complete control. That's what you said being a dictator was.
User avatar
!beef
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:41 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:15 am

Using money is a perfectly honorable strategy, using an armed force and threatening the Jarls to vote is another thing.

Using bribes is yet another way dictators come to power.
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:34 pm

The Empire doesn't threaten the Imperial Jarls to vote for Elisif, the Jarls can vote for anyone they choose whereas Ulfric literally says "They'll vote for me because my armies are in their holds"
No, but they install Jarls who make sure that the Emperor and his Elder Council are the true leaders of Skyrim. And armies in the cities who rebelled to ensure it. Still a dictatorship no matter who wins.
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:24 am

If Ulfric was a true dictator, he'd have killed all the Jarls so they couldn't challenge him to the throne.
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:13 pm

No, but they install Jarls who make sure that the Emperor and his Elder Council are the true leaders of Skyrim. And armies in the cities who rebelled to ensure it. Still a dictatorship no matter who wins.

No, a Jarl could still vote for someone else under Imperial rule.
User avatar
Kevin Jay
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:29 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:25 am

I mean it's possible, but unlikely. I don't think they want to make your character an oathbreaker because when you sign up for a faction, you swear an oath.

That kind of leaves the only path being that Ulfric/Elisif die and you fight your way to the crown.

Hey wouldn't be the first time. The Nerevarine was supposed to drive the Outlanders out according to the prophecy, and the Dunmer seemed a bit confused why my Cyrod ass wasn't getting around to that yet.
But a battle for the crown? Well...When you play the game of thrones...
User avatar
Mari martnez Martinez
 
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:39 am

Post » Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:21 am

The Emperor is not a dictator.
Actually yes, an emperor is a dictator. Having absolute and complete control over everything and does whatever they want.
User avatar
Jimmie Allen
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:39 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim