There are Beth community managers wandering about occasionally. They currently will be working on patching and DLCs, much more important.
Agree. It would be positively traumatic (and a huge time-sink) to be a developer of this game and read some of the stuff on these boards!
Other devs managed it just fine . Obsidian did a good job of it. CDPR did a good job of it.
Obsidian is a different organization than Bethesda right?
"Notch" was the heart and soul of the Minecraft forums for a long time. But then he eventually became a billionaire and sold his ownership of the IP to Microsoft.
And yet they had no issue with it making Fallout New Vegas
That's objectively false based on the number of threads I've seen locked on these forums over the years.
I guess I am sort of spoiled. many of the games I own the devs come in and speak and talk about it...It leaves me feeling they are not reading this stuff. or taking constructive criticisms or praise etc.
I'm one of the biggest quote 'Bethesda haters' on here and I'd never directly make such a demand.To paraphrase Noam Chomsky, 'speaking truth to power' is pointless.Those in power already know the truth, it would be naive of me to think Bethesda isn't well versed in our criticisms of Bethesda's ethos.
End of thread... (that's not a literal injunction, don't ban me moderators...).
Exactly. This game is the computer game equivalent of a blockbuster and with fame and riches people naturally have to be a bit more distant. "Fan" after all is part of the word "fanatic."
I agree though, that some sort of "weekly Dev blog" coordinated by someone at a middle level (maybe even Mr. Howard himself?) in which some effort was made to "gauge sentiment" in the community (a VERY tricky business, and maybe not even best done by reading these boards) and provide commentary, clarifications, etc.
The fact that they already released a beta patch tells us they are not "disengaged," though I have no idea how they learned about the issues they corrected in their beta patch.
@ John and your Chomsky quote: that was absurd! He was talking about communist dictators, not capitalist producers of entertainment!
True, but the sentiment holds.You generally don't need to inform people in power of the 'truth', that should apply to any form of power; communist or capitalist.
But in this case, "they" only have as much power as you give them by buying their product and participating on this board.
The means in which they acquire power aren't important, only that they have it.
I'd also say it's quite naive to suggest that we freely give them their power, under no illusion.
But this is going to become political (which I'd gladly discuss), and it's going to derail the thread.
So agree to disagree, or you can pm me if you have any qualms with what I've said.
The devs are busy making DLC, to squeeze some more shekels out of their customer base.
Personally, I'd like to see more dev involvement on the forums, and think it's a no-brainer. Many other developers I follow have very visible and active participation with their forum followers, with designated reps; I've never really understood why Beth doesn't follow a similar model.
The whole " they can't handle the criticism" bit doesn't fly with me, get a professional to do a professional job. Someone with a bit thicker skin, and a direct conduit to the game's core.
That said, the OP could have worded his Topic Title much more diplomatically; catch a lot more flies with honey, I've found.
Right, my point was that titling your post something similar to "Calling all Devs" or "Questions for Devs", etc., might be perceived a wee bit better, as opposed to calling them out en masse.