I can't believe they would put something as lame as this in their book.
Then you're in luck because this has nothing to do with belief. The issue can be solved matter-of-factly just by reading the book, and whadya know, its in the book! Guess you believed wrong... :shrug:
#1. The 36 Lessons of Vivec are religious propaganda and therefore should be treated as such (i.e. the "moral" of the story is the focus, not the actual events).
#2. The story as told in the 36 Lessons of Vivec is already known to be false as Nerevar was dead before Vivec had power.
Firstly, there is no dichotomy between propaganda and truth. Secondly, the 36 Sermons aren't propaganda - propaganda is information spread to large numbers in order to sway their beliefs, the Sermons are only meant for one person and with the purpose of guiding... Besides, we don't have to take the Sermons at their word; we can see the rock, we know it falls.
Also, you need to brush up on your Temple propaganda, else you'd know that that doesn't matter.
All I'm saying is that the frozen comet does not have the natural ability to retain velocity for several centuries, and therefore it would have required a constant flow of power to maintain for no real reason. Since the Ghostgate was significantly more important than a floating rock, why did Vivec choose to waste so much energy (especially once he was no longer able to make his annual trek to Red Mountain to recharge)?
You're quite mistaken. Vivec's spell was a one time exertion of power which froze it, it was the love of the people that kept it frozen. The 'constant flow of power' didn't come from him, rather from the people as a stipulation of the spell.
As evidence that its not Vivec directly holding it up, witness that if you kill Vivec it doesn't crash, one may therefore assume that something else is at work, this something else is the love of the people... because ya' know, love's magickal...
I didn't suggest that he didn't stop it, only that our only known source regarding the incident is propaganda which is known to be factually incorrect.
Sure, but failing an actual explanation of the mechanics of the magic (which TES almost always provides), you are assuming much when you state that the velocity was magically maintained.
You see, the problem here is that you start with a false assumption. You assume that propaganda is incorrect and then base all your conclusions off of that, even when those conclusions directly contradict blatant evidence to the contrary.
However the fact is that that propaganda is
known to be factually correct. How is this so, well, its been
proven factually correct. Read.
I've already explained to you the mechanics of it.
I have to apply logic since the story failed to suspend my disbelief. Had they come up with a story that wasn't terrible my disbelief would have been suspended and no logic would be applied satisfying all involved. Since this is not the case, the natural evolution of the literary process is to begin to discover the reasons as to why disbelief was not suspended and this requires a logical anolysis, fantastic setting notwithstanding.
Again, you're simply mistaken. If something is designed to suspend your disbelief then regardless it will not hold up to logic, afterall, that was the point of suspending your disbelief. That you don't like the story and refuse that suspension is of no relevance. If you're unwilling then the point is moot.
Luckily, this all makes sense, you're just ignoring that fact because of your dislike for it. :nod: