Which Fallout cameo would you love to discover in Skyrim?

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:22 am

sorry double post
User avatar
jenny goodwin
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:57 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:17 am

None. Although I also wouldn't be traumatized if there's a "Grognak" NPC (but make it an Orc, please...).
User avatar
Euan
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:35 am

The only kind I would tolerate would be either a character whose name was phonetically similar or an in-game book that detailed the fictional story of the Fellowship of Iron who quested to recover the ancient Armor of Power.
User avatar
Stu Clarke
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:45 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:33 am

Nothing, nothing, nothing.
I love Fallout, but they're separate series and need to stay separate. It would be way too out of place, I don't want it at all. Nope.
User avatar
Isaiah Burdeau
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:58 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:12 am

Keep Fallout out of TES and TES out of Fallout. Nothing should ever cross over between the two.
User avatar
asako
 
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:16 am

Post » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:09 pm

I almost went with Grognak the Barbarian, but in the end I chose "nothing." As much as I love both series, I think we should really keep them separate. :)
User avatar
Nikki Morse
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:08 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:24 am

So if you've never played Fallout, and wouldn't get the reference anyways, why would you choose "absolutely none"?

Because this is TES and not Fallout.
User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:15 am

Grognak the barbarian would be most lore-friendly, but I'd rather keep Fallout out of TES and vice versa.
User avatar
Laura
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:11 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:21 pm

It's like poking around a technical thread that you don't know a thing.
You wouldn't love, nor would you care. So why show people nothing is better than other alternative?

Maybe I should have added at the beginning two nothings:
"Nothing: I want fallout to stay away from TES"
"if it doesn't mess up with the lore, whatever"




First off, just because the FO series JUST landed into Bethesda's lap doesn't mean they need to start spreading it into TES for shix and giggles and did Fo3 even have any Oblivion references? I can't recall any at the moment.
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:00 am

First off, just because the FO series JUST landed into Bethesda's lap doesn't mean they need to start spreading it into TES for shix and giggles and did Fo3 even have any Oblivion references? I can't recall any at the moment.

This.
User avatar
Marquis deVille
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:52 am

Because this is TES and not Fallout.


Thank you . . . :) . . . I was biting my tongue.

~ Dani ~ :)

Edit: Although the Grognak alternative sounds acceptable, despite the name not turning up on UESP wiki. If it makes people happy.

Edit: And the name does sound more Orcish than Nordic.
User avatar
Jaylene Brower
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:24 pm

Post » Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:15 pm

Grognak the barbarian would be most lore-friendly, but I'd rather keep Fallout out of TES and vice versa.

User avatar
Angela
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:33 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:28 pm

None. For the last time, Keep fallout 3 out of Skyrim.
User avatar
Terry
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:21 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:10 am

First off, just because the FO series JUST landed into Bethesda's lap doesn't mean they need to start spreading it into TES for shix and giggles and did Fo3 even have any Oblivion references? I can't recall any at the moment.


The image of the barbarian class does a cameo in the magazine that gives 1 point of melee to you. TES cameo in FO3.

And you may not agree with this, and many of you in this forum, but I consider the Fallout Series as great as TES, nothing bad putting a cameo in TES, stop being so protective from changes and irrelevant details.
User avatar
Rachel Tyson
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:42 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:19 am

I would prefer Elder Scrolls easter eggs/cameos then ones from a whole diffrent reality. Why take from one series when the current one has a plethora of lore and people to use?
User avatar
Destinyscharm
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 6:06 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:14 am

Fallout may be good, but it's wastes do not deserve to taint the beauty of TES, Fallout is unworthy.
User avatar
Ronald
 
Posts: 3319
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:34 am

à nuka Cola bottle would be cool.
User avatar
sas
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:40 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:38 am

Okay I was just thinking how funny it would be to be mountain climbing or what have you in Skyrim and come across a non-accesable Fallout Vault door. I didn't give it a second thought :tes: until now. Now after reading the first page of posts I agree that TES and Fallout should stay seperate :poke: ...That being said I would love too see my character climbing up a mountainous range find a vault door , then open it and BAM!!! Krognak the Barbarian comes out swinging his sword :starwars: and like Jason in the Friday the 13th NES video game he is unbeatable :wallbash: !!! and every time you fall to your death that you try to get into the Vault Krognak stands above your body and and tea bags you :cry: (Not a pretty site!!!) !!! :brokencomputer:

But honestly I don't think it will happen. maybe as DLC but even that I seriously doubt
User avatar
Mr. Ray
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:08 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:04 am

Grognak or the vault wouldn't be immerssion breaking, wouldn't mind them. Maybe if there was a named mudcrap named mirelurk that you could sell items to. I wonder if all the people [censored]ing about immersion have ever been to http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Easter_Eggs
User avatar
Cheville Thompson
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:31 am

Grognak is the only one I would tolerate....and maybe an Ogre named Marcus or Uncle Leo. :)

Jimmy, how would a vault not be immersion breaking? There are no vaults in the TES world.
User avatar
Emma-Jane Merrin
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:52 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:59 am

id like to see a toy maker that creates little figurines that have heads that rattle.... he calls them rattle heads. and one can be a blond nord boy wearing a blue tunic
User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:25 am

I wouldn't mind for ONE vault door hiding somewhere, I can easily forget, And I can also have a nice laugh and time with it. Would break immersion only once and It would be cool.
But I did care for the Roman Empire cameo in Morrowind clothing... EVERY TIME I saw an Imperial Guard I thought I was playing Rome Total War RPG
User avatar
Alyna
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:48 am

It would be cool to find something as simple as a bottle cap that says nuka-cola on it or something.
User avatar
Taylor Bakos
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:05 am

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:08 am

@ you people who want Fallout cameos,

Even after I've mentioned it twice, you are not interested in acknowledging Pip Boy as an option? Surely he is the epitome of the Fallout universe...

Having a little blond boy called Pip running around one of the cities who may say strange things when talked to is infinitely preferable to Nuka Cola turning up anywhere, or some massive 101 Vault door!
User avatar
Jaylene Brower
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:24 pm

Post » Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:22 am

I wonder if all the people [censored]ing about immersion have ever been to http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Easter_Eggs


I have, actually. Even more importantly, I've read the page completely. Have you? :)

With respect to "Easter Eggs", the word "subtle" comes to mind . . . some of the so-called "Easter Eggs" are so subtle that whether or not they're actually "Easter Eggs" has been debated quite passionately on this forum and the wiki. At the request of the wiki moderators, many of those references have been labeled "likely" or "possible" Easter Eggs because two related facts does not an Easter Egg make. After all, the mere fact there's a reference to, say, the "Black Hand" in Oblivion doesn't necessarily mean it's a reference an informal name of a real life assassination group.

And give credit to Bethesda: Immersion and TES Lore have ALWAYS taken precedence over Easter Eggs.

~ Dani ~ :)
User avatar
BRIANNA
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:51 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim