Who agrees that filling the time-gap between Crysis 1 and Crysis 2 with a comicbookstorlyine was a bad idea? Especially killing two main protagonists in this series "which not even every Crysis Fan is aware about". I mean come on Crytek.... Killing Helena and Nomad and not even mentioning them in Crysis 2 is almost an insult to your fans. Having at least Psycho back in Crysis 3 doesnt make it much better. So should we always spend extra money for storyholes that your games make up?

You can say anything about COD what you want... but at least they know how to keep their storyline together without the need of a comicbook side series!

I would vote for this Comicbookstoryline to be NON CANON to the games!

To me it always seemed like a cheap excuse!

Same here.

?What if they write a comic book about Half Life now where they kill Gordon Freeman and in HL3/HL2:EP3 they're like: "Lol freeman is dead series rebootz!!!11!!2!!!!!1 one !!!!1111"? I just feel the same way.

Don't get me wrong, Crysis 2 is good and imo it has a better plot (haters gonna hate I know you people disagree) than Crysis 1, but it's just too different, it just doesn't feel like Crysis anymore.

In their time, science is so advanced. I'm sure Nomad, Helena etc can be resurrected via their DNA.
Remember the Alien movies? I won't surprised if they really are in Crysis 4, 5 etc