The builders are able to build and rebuild - such is their purpose. The destroyers are to destroy and ruin the work of the builders, but once their deed is done, what is left to destroy?

Awesome proverbs aside, I believe we haven't sufficient information about the Aedra (thanks for downplaying ALL of them except Akatosh/Talos, Oblivion) to form a conclusion on this.

But they are both et-Ada, and the ones who created were weakened and the ones who stood aside and watched as creation was done were not weakened in the slightest bit. So daedra, in that sense, have more "vitality" and power. But my initial question was who had the most power in the sense of who could take Nirn and crush it with one blow. Or even more powerful would be if something/someone could undo creation. Daedra were created by the simpering catfight of Anu and Padomay (Padhome).... well, et-Ada were.... so if they were created, then they should be able to be uncreated, causing the mundus to lose their bound realms.

M'Aiq the Liar. Obviously.

I agree with Hackworthy. It makes the most sense.
Seriously though, power is a subjective thing and can be defined in different ways (creation, destruction etc etc). I don't think it can be defined in a clear cut way.
I'm not well versed in ES Lore so I could be missing an obvious conclusion but that's my 2 cents.


KAKAROT!!!!!!