I'm going to say they will be in DLC along with spears. Think of the money they would make.
I don't buy DLC for any game so that's really going to hinder my experience. Oh well.
Stopped listening right around here.
That was an awfully pathetic attempt at being clever.
Because with the exception of one Chinese weapon, crossbows can fire one bolt at a time. And they take a long time to reload.
So basically you'd have to want a weapon you can use once per fight.
And even if they do an unrealistic crossbow, it can't do anything a bow can't. So what's the point?
What? Crossbows are enhanced versions of bows. They take a little longer to prep but the damage they do is vastly more devastating and depending on the fight, it may be more lucrative than a bow.
they removed them cause it was redundant to keep them.
You do understand that anything other than a sword is redundant, right (for melee purposes anyways)? Yet we have two-handed swords, two-handed axes, one-handed axes, daggers, etc.
maybe it's much to animate and just because magic exist doesn't mean they should
How is it too much to animate? Crossbows alone would be vastly similar to bows and the rest I imagine are small enough to require minimal effort.
Your question could of fit in the topic title. Stop baiting people to click your topic.
Except the question doesn't pertain to just crossbows ergo it would be misleading. Stop posting in threads with off-topic nonsense.