Why I believe that Skyrim will be the best TES game to date.

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:47 am

I'm saying that once people basically say "Its a fact because its my opinion". Then its pointless to keep talking.


Ahhh if this is what you meant from the beginning, then, I agree. Its still hard to stop talking though. We are prideful creatures, and we hate having our DELUSIONAL opinions looked down upon. Whether they actually are being looked down upon or not. lol

Anywho, all things considered(not saying much with the little info we have so far), Skyrim is looking/sounds pretty good right now. The fact that BGS does listen to us, and does constantly tweek their baby, makes me comfortable about where the series is heading in general. Although I do understand the plight of those among us that hate the constant disappearance of so called old-school rpg mechanics.(table top and early d&d video game mechanics... the "numbers" as it where)

edit: really poor grammar
User avatar
Penny Flame
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:53 am

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:14 pm

I know, I agree with all of this.


No need to say anything else my friend. Lets forget our silly side bar conversation and get back on the Skyrim Bandwagon O' Awesomeness. ALL ABOARD!
User avatar
Campbell
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:54 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:19 pm

No need to say anything else my friend. Lets forget our silly side bar conversation and get back on the Skyrim Bandwagon O' Awesomeness. ALL ABOARD!


Awesome, so does anyone know if some previously removed features will be returned?
User avatar
Keeley Stevens
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:04 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:51 am

To me:

10/10 = Battlefield 3, Crysis 1/2
9/10 = Rage
8.5/10 = Witcher 2
8/10 = RDR
6.5/10 = Skyrim

I think Skyrim "fails" a few points because of lack of texture depth (depth, not detail), bad/mediocre lighting in a lot of scenes, low-poly models, etc. That's my opinion of course, and my honest one. Each person have different standards. Some people still think Oblivion is the best graphical game that exists. If I had never known about Skyrim before or what TES is, I'd give it a 6.5/10, and that's why I give it now.
Also, note I'm talking about graphics in terms of technical stuff, not art or anything like that.

That's fine and all, but those games are small in comparison to games like TES. Those games are celled instances while TES games are huge massive worlds. You cannot have both, sorry. Not with this gen of tech.

Skyrim looks great for how big the gameworld. Please show me another game, that looks better, that is the same size or bigger than Skyrim. And length of game does not count as "big". That has nothing to do with it. The cell of the actual game world, which is many miles.
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:18 pm

That's fine and all, but those games are small in comparison to games like TES. Those games are celled instances while TES games are huge massive worlds. You cannot have both, sorry. Not with this gen of tech.

I was comparing the graphics, not the world as a whole. Also, RDR is twice as big as Skyrim and none of them except for Rage got cell seperation.

When you review something you need to look in the specifics, then sum everything up as a whole. When you review something you can't say "Ah yes, while the graphics may not look so good in the game, they could look better if there weren't these and these and these technical limitations." You review the game as it is, not what it could be if something else was present. That's at least what I did. The end.

@Galen:
Massive facepalm.
User avatar
Marnesia Steele
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:11 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:30 am

To me:

10/10 = Battlefield 3, Crysis 1/2
9/10 = Rage
8.5/10 = Witcher 2
8/10 = RDR
6.5/10 = Skyrim

I think Skyrim "fails" a few points because of lack of texture depth (depth, not detail), bad/mediocre lighting in a lot of scenes, low-poly models, etc. That's my opinion of course, and my honest one. Each person have different standards. Some people still think Oblivion is the best graphical game that exists. If I had never known about Skyrim before or what TES is, I'd give it a 6.5/10, and that's why I give it now.
Also, note I'm talking about graphics in terms of technical stuff, not art or anything like that.



If we're talking graphics, really, that's not all that bad of a list. Personally, I'd put Crysis 2 and Battlefield 2 with Rage, since Crysis2 and BF3 have very linear worlds, that don't render the same way as Crysis 1, thus are actually much less graphically impressive. Rage looks great, but not as good in detail as BF3 or Crysis2, but the world is build differently, more than compensating for that.

The Witcher 2 is fine where it is. I got my hands on that, and screenshots and videos don't do it justice. I hate it's art still, but it's graphically, very impressive even at lower settings.

I'd either put RDR down one, or Skyrim up one, they're about equal. RDR plays from the third-person almost exculsively, if you get close, you find a lot of the detail is actually much lower than even Oblivion, and the world itself isn't particularly malleable. RDR has some of the best Weather Effects I've seen though.


Now, if we're talking Aesthetics instead of graphics, here's my list, using the same games.

10/10 = Rage
9/10 = Skyrim, Red Dead Redemption, Crysis
8/10 = Crysis2
7/10 = Battlefield 3
4/10 = The Witcher 2.
User avatar
Jessica Phoenix
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:49 am

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:35 pm

RDR does not look "better" than Skyrim.
Also, going to have to disagree with you hlvr. When judging games it's pretty silly (imo) to not look at the technical aspects in context of the game. That just doesn't make sense to me. Why wouldn't you?
User avatar
Gemma Archer
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:02 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:01 pm

RDR is twice as big and most of that world is empty.
User avatar
Stat Wrecker
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:14 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:18 am

Has there been any footage/screenshots from PC yet? As far as I know they've only released stuff on the 360.
User avatar
Nauty
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:58 pm

Post » Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:34 pm

When I look at SR, I think , "Wow".

Perhaps I'm just easy to please.

I think the graphics look great.
User avatar
Code Affinity
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:18 am

Has there been any footage/screenshots from PC yet? As far as I know they've only released stuff on the 360.

360 only.
User avatar
Terry
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:21 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:59 am

RDR is twice as big and most of that world is empty.


The world of RDR looks really good and I had a blast playing it. But... There is less content furlong for furlong than in a ES/Fallout game. I wont be a third through Skyrim content wise, compared to the time it took me to finish Red Dead.(did everything) And that is absolutely not a knock on RDR, instead a testament of what we get out of any old ES/Fallout game. Skyrim is also much more replayable. And if you throw in our experienced and hard working MOD community...

DAM IT!! Why isnt it 11/11 yet!!! :banghead: :swear: lol
User avatar
StunnaLiike FiiFii
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:30 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:46 am

It seems to take out alot of problems Oblivion had - the crappy sense of culture (boringmess), level scaling, more weapons/armor, hand crafted vs generated land, attribute grinding minor skills.

I highly doubt people will look at Skyrim a few years later and say "ZOMG OBLIVION BETTER!11" like they do with Oblivion and Morrowind now.


Nostalgia is truly powerful, just as it is with those Morrowind lovers ;)
User avatar
Nathan Maughan
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:47 am

I'm going to err on the side of caution and withhold my judgement of the game as a whole until I play the game. Optimism often leads to disappointment, even if the game is good.

Nostalgia is truly powerful, just as it is with those Morrowind lovers ;)

Hardly. I've been playing Morrowind like mad for the past few weeks, and I have ZERO gameplay mods, only visual mods. The game is just as good as I remember.
User avatar
Bek Rideout
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:00 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:11 pm

I do think that a true more "hardcoe" RPG experience, such as that found in Morrowind, and actiony gameplay can cohexist in one game. I just don't think they've done it quite right. Instead of seeing things that define good rpgs I see things that define "good" action rpgs.
User avatar
Francesca
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:26 am

See, I think Oblivion was a test game of sorts as far as what they can do. I think they put their hearts into it, I'm not saying they were just fooling around, but the game was horribly optimized as far as the game engines were concerned. Yet, Oblivion did things right. They improved on a lot of redundant game mechanics that truly had no purpose in MW. They removed a lot of the frustrating things about MW , but again, concerning a few things, they over-simplified. A lot. And therein lies my problem with OB.

Yeah, if I want to compare them with Windows, I would say that Morrowind is XP, Oblivion is Vista and hopefully Skyrim would be Seven. ;)

For Vista they abandoned a lot of reliable mechanisms of the old trusty XP, and tested a lot of new ideas for Vista, but botched it all with ill judged decisions and bad luck.

For Seven, they took the core idea of vista and overhauled it completely into Seven which is the best Windows yet.

I'm hopeful that it would happen for Skyrim, as one usually gains experience from the past mistakes.
User avatar
Suzie Dalziel
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:24 pm

RDR is twice as big and most of that world is empty.


Which at times can be a good thing.
I like my gameworld not to feel like a Tokyo rush hour subway carriage.
User avatar
Tha King o Geekz
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 9:14 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:29 pm

Which at times can be a good thing.
I like my gameworld not to feel like a Tokyo rush hour subway carriage.

I agree, but RDR is too barren to be making fair comparisons to other gameworlds. Any dev can throw in huge chunks of empty land. Nothing spectacular about that.
User avatar
louise fortin
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:51 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:12 am

No RPG can be better than morrowind in my opinion. I still refer back to morrowind when new RPGs come out.
User avatar
Arnold Wet
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:32 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:22 am

No RPG can be better than morrowind in my opinion. I still refer back to morrowind when new RPGs come out.

I do the same thing, but with Daggerfall.
User avatar
R.I.P
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:11 pm

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:09 am

No RPG can be better than morrowind in my opinion. I still refer back to morrowind when new RPGs come out.

And I do the same thing, which is why I'm biased. Morrowind is still amazing to me. I play it on the 360, GOTY edition. No mods and it's still my favorite game of all time.
User avatar
Georgine Lee
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:50 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:59 am

Bah, it will be probably the worst , bethesda 's software is in decline. Middle fantasy, level locking and cliche dragons already sound boring . One of the screenshots released shows a corner in the waterfall lol
User avatar
Justin
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:32 am

Post » Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:02 am

One of the screenshots released shows a corner in the waterfall lol

What?
User avatar
Alexander Horton
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:19 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim