Why blame consoles?

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 5:29 am

Yes, I know Bethesda is developing the game mainly for consoles, and I know that means they won't match high-end PC expectations. THIS IS NOT AN ANTI-PC THREAD

All I wanted to ask is why people say consoles ruin all video games. Almost every thing I see a PC gamer say, from youtube comments to this forum, is that the game is over simplified so they can be played on consoles, then they go and say how much better PC's are, which i agree that in some ways they are. But most gamers don't want to have to download a bunch of mods or other things, but they really do want a simple gaming system, and don't want to spend all the money to get or build a good PC. Yes the vanilla game is better on consoles, but PC gamers can run the game with bettter graphics and everything, and they also have the ability to fix whatever they want by making or downloading mods for free.

PC gamers have all these things that make better than consoles, but I actually prefer my XBOX 360. Why? Because I really do want to just start up a game for the first time and instantly enjoy it, not having to go through a bunch of setting to get the game the way I like it, after I install the whole darn thing to my computer. Plus XBOX LIVE is awesome, I can play whatever i want and still talk to my friends no matter what I or they are playing.

Skyrim's vanilla version may be better on consoles, I know, but most gamers play on consoles. So yes, the orignal game give more attention on consoles, but don't any of you dare think that they give console gamers themselves more attention, I mean they give PC gamers the entire engine that they made fro Skyrim.

PC's and consoles both have they're ups and downs, so why do so many PC gamers try to over glorify they're computers? If anyone has an answer I want to hear it.

And if there is another thread like this, I would like a link if you may.



1. I don't recall having many problems getting my settings correct on any PC game i've ever played, save Black Ops because it was a horrible port and game in general.
2. Since you appear to be a casual it makes sense you've never heard of a little thing called steam that blows xbox live away
3. xbox is just part of microsofts plan to nickel and dime its customers to death - PS3 is the far superior console
4. The advantage of consoles is that you don't have to worry about whether or not it can run it - i get pissed off when they do the same thing by porting the lesser version of the game to the PC like we're some sort of second hand breed of gamers
User avatar
lacy lake
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:13 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:06 pm

Skyrim will be the 1st game to be made primarily for the console at bethesda.


except, you know, Oblivion. and Fallout 3.

Though honestly i blame this for the most part on todd howard, since hes constantly stated he prefers the xbox over any other platform.


LET'S BLAME TODD FOR EVERYTHING GUYS
User avatar
Penny Wills
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:16 pm

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:01 am

I find everything beyond racing and fighting games to be impossible to enjoy with a controller, so, I play on PC.

And I find keyboards extremelyawkward to play anything with. Everyone has their own preference. :smile:
User avatar
Alexandra Ryan
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:24 pm

Consoles are keeping game development and evolution back technology wise .


Long time ago I'd have agreed to that, but their actual specs are just ridiculous, and they're actually more limiting the games rather than forcing the devs to optimize resources.

Consoles are 1 disc only so developers are limited in what they can do


And that's a good thing...how? Less discs = Less content and less detail. The 360 is limited to 6,8 gbs because of people who wants "only 1 disc", and that amount is becoming pretty little, limiting even more game development.

Console gamers want to just start up a game for the first time and instantly enjoy it, not having to go through a bunch of setting to get the game the way I like it, PC gamers -most of the crowd i know - hates this simplistic approach , we want to have absolute control over everything and to an extent we are not casual gamers but rather dedicated ones.
Because of their horrible controls consoles require horrible UIs and game mechanics - like combat & movement -
Console gamers accept the game for what it is , like or dislike , PC gamers think what can be done with the game in order to improve , criticise developers for their shortfalls , whine in the forums , be creative - i guess this is because of our dedication-


We like more details and customization. Again, what's wrong with that?

If console users want simplicity, then go ahead and have it. I have no problem with that. But again, quite a lot of console users have asked for mods for consoles...(which are NOT simple, neither to install or (some) even to use).
User avatar
Nick Tyler
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:57 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:04 pm

Tbh though with the level of arrogance I see comming out of most PC gamers regarding this topic. I can safely say they totally deserve it.

At the same time though I would rather see a game like skyrim that had it's roots on the PC to be opimized properly for PC play > Console. Less we have another Dragon Age 2 on our hands :P

EDIT: just to make myself more clear, I mean in a broad sense not to this topic. This is one of the most tame console vs PC threads I have ever seen lol
User avatar
Flutterby
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:28 am

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:51 am

And I find keyboards extremelyawkward to play anything with. Everyone has their own preference. :smile:

Yes, but this thread is about why PC gamers get defensive, I just tried to explain why PC gaming means so much to me,before I went into what angers me about the market, no need to tell me you prefer console controls, i realize that.


@vincent Arroangt PC gamers? really? where? I mostly see a lot of console gamers hating on PC gamers for stating facts. Sure everybody gets arrogant sometimes, but I am frankly sicka nd tired of being called an elitist just because I agree that consoles are holding games back, because thats simply fact.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:33 pm

1. I don't recall having many problems getting my settings correct on any PC game i've ever played, save Black Ops because it was a horrible port and game in general.
2. Since you appear to be a casual it makes sense you've never heard of a little thing called steam that blows xbox live away
3. xbox is just part of microsofts plan to nickel and dime its customers to death - PS3 is the far superior console
4. The advantage of consoles is that you don't have to worry about whether or not it can run it - i get pissed off when they do the same thing by porting the lesser version of the game to the PC like we're some sort of second hand breed of gamers


Read my mind here. Point 4 is especially part of my problem with feeling alienated as a PC gamer. I mean, I do a lot of hunting for information and spec-checking and rebuilding to get my games running pristine. I'd appreciate it if the game were actually functional on my system (looking at you, New Vegas, cough cough...).
User avatar
Sasha Brown
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:04 pm

I mean, hell. A lot of us feel cheated when it comes to game optimization. Someone above me mentioned the difference between Dragon Age and DA2. Dragon Age was positively a sweet PC experience. DA2 didn't feel "optimized," it felt like they took the first game and said "put it on a console, and add a "2" to it. Oh, an throw it on the PC too, I guess." :sadvaultboy:
User avatar
RaeAnne
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:40 pm

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:56 am

Tbh though with the level of arrogance I see comming out of most PC gamers regarding this topic. I can safely say they totally deserve it.

I don't see it, but even as a PC gamer, I can safely say arrogance is stupid.

You didn't invent it, you bought it.

No reason to be proud.
User avatar
Daddy Cool!
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:34 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:16 pm

It doesnt matter that you can set the game setting to 2560x1920 on a PC, because the game will be rendering its textures at a console level, which will likely be at 1280x720, and then simply upscaling the textures to fit the resolution. This creates a wierd kind of effect that is the main reason i didnt buy the new motorstorm game for console. My tv could go 1080, and the game allegedly could, but it actually was rendering at 720. What i want is for them to make the game for the PC, to have the textures render in 2560x1920, and then if the game is ported to consoles, downscale it for them. This is hardly a problem for console gamers as you are sitting 3-6 feet away and most console gamers can't really tell the difference anyways. My main problem is the fact that i feel after spending years loyal to bethesda, they are just flipping pc gamers off and video taping todd howard humping his 360
User avatar
Lizs
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:45 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:14 pm

It doesnt matter that you can set the game setting to 2560x1920 on a PC, because the game will be rendering its textures at a console level, which will likely be at 1280x720, and then simply upscaling the textures to fit the resolution. This creates a wierd kind of effect that is the main reason i didnt buy the new motorstorm game for console. My tv could go 1080, and the game allegedly could, but it actually was rendering at 720. What i want is for them to make the game for the PC, to have the textures render in 2560x1920, and then if the game is ported to consoles, downscale it for them. This is hardly a problem for console gamers as you are sitting 3-6 feet away and most console gamers can't really tell the difference anyways. My main problem is the fact that i feel after spending years loyal to bethesda, they are just flipping pc gamers off and video taping todd howard humping his 360


You wanna include your RAM in that?
User avatar
*Chloe*
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:13 pm

My main problem is the fact that i feel after spending years loyal to bethesda, they are just flipping pc gamers off and video taping todd howard humping his 360


Mmhmm. This.

And the image of your last thought.... :mellow: BWAH HA HA!
User avatar
Penny Courture
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:59 pm

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:39 am

You wanna include your RAM in that?


I have 2 gigs of ram thanks

http://shop.amd.com/US/_layouts/shop/ProductDetails.aspx?productID=100312SR®ion=us-en
User avatar
Shianne Donato
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:33 pm

Posts deleted, any form of console/platform bashing will be looked on unfavorably by the moderators.
User avatar
Lilit Ager
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:06 pm

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 5:38 am

My main problem is the fact that i feel after spending years loyal to bethesda, they are just flipping pc gamers off and video taping todd howard humping his 360


you mean by releasing the PC version with better graphics and mod tools?
User avatar
Sara Johanna Scenariste
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:24 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:40 pm

@vincent Arroangt PC gamers? really? where? I mostly see a lot of console gamers hating on PC gamers for stating facts. Sure everybody gets arrogant sometimes, but I am frankly sicka nd tired of being called an elitist just because I agree that consoles are holding games back, because thats simply fact.


I don't see it, but even as a PC gamer, I can safely say arrogance is stupid.


No guys you misunderstood me, in retrospec this discussion is very civil compared to what I have seen these kinds of topics become. :)

Usually I see PC users starting whole threads just to primarily bash consoles. I'm a PC user as well but I think its pretty arrogant to do things like that.
User avatar
kat no x
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:39 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:59 pm

PCs are a good investment, but the way I see it, consoles just make it run even BETTER on my machine (which is not that good :() :intergalactic:

@Britishwolf, Um, Pong wasn't a console game


I don't agree, PC's make a terrible investment, not even 3 years down the track and most of my hardware in my current but broken PC is obscelete and worthless, how much can you get for a E8500, 4 gig of DDR800 Ram and a GTX285 now? 300 bucks? Not even? As soon as you buy PC hardware it is outdated and something better and faster is out, I upgraded for 15 years spending thousands and thousands of dollars for what? Keeping up with technology? Being able to game even in 1680X1050 with everything on maximum? (or 640X480 on my old 486 DX4 100 mhz)

Then it happened, I got married and had a little girl, all of a sudden consoles looked like a good comprimise, when I got my PS3 free in a Sony promotion when I bought my 52 inch Sony Bravia I haven't looked back! I can now game without worrying about upgrading, driver issues, software issues, windows issues, incompatibilities, patches, reformatting... I simply put the disk in and play and over 4 years later my PS3 has not broken down ONCE my desktop had done this 5 or 6 times in the same amount of time.

This isn't going to stop me PC gaming mind you, I am buying a Asus G74 gaming laptop to play Skyrim in 1920X1080 and maybe even connect it to my TV to see how it looks in full HD as obviously my PS3 won't be able to replicate this! I am just saying that Consoles arn't the big evil that PC only gamers think they are, for some reason they think that just because a game is available on the consoles as well that it must have been dumbed down gameplay or graphics wise for the PC version too!
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:52 pm

1. I don't recall having many problems getting my settings correct on any PC game i've ever played, save Black Ops because it was a horrible port and game in general.
2. Since you appear to be a casual it makes sense you've never heard of a little thing called steam that blows xbox live away
3. xbox is just part of microsofts plan to nickel and dime its customers to death - PS3 is the far superior console
4. The advantage of consoles is that you don't have to worry about whether or not it can run it - i get pissed off when they do the same thing by porting the lesser version of the game to the PC like we're some sort of second hand breed of gamers

................................ugh..............................................

1. I just don't want to have to go through all the settings
2. I play video games a lot but i don't want a whole bunch of complexity, if that makes me casual than awesome. And Steam being better than LIVE is your opinion.
3. To me you just seem to be a Microsoft hater. If the PS3 is better, that meaning Sony is better in your opinion, what do you call that massive dilema because PSN got hacked.
4. If you pumped the money into your computer to get it that good then expected games to match your expectations, that's your fault

I honestly don't think I have much more to say to you, you just seem like another person whp is obsessed with their computer and think you should have your every whim catered to.
User avatar
Stephanie Valentine
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:09 pm

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:49 pm

Read my mind here. Point 4 is especially part of my problem with feeling alienated as a PC gamer. I mean, I do a lot of hunting for information and spec-checking and rebuilding to get my games running pristine. I'd appreciate it if the game were actually functional on my system (looking at you, New Vegas, cough cough...).


You speak for me. Fortunately, BF3 and games like it, the Crysis 2 DX11 patch and the hope of running stuff at 2560x1600 keeps me looking for good components, despite the console ports (which I have no plans of buying any of them, with the possible exceptions of Mass Effect 3 and Skyrim, IF they are console ports anyway).

I mean, hell. A lot of us feel cheated when it comes to game optimization. Someone above me mentioned the difference between Dragon Age and DA2. Dragon Age was positively a sweet PC experience. DA2 didn't feel "optimized," it felt like they took the first game and said "put it on a console, and add a "2" to it. Oh, an throw it on the PC too, I guess." :sadvaultboy:


I cannot count how many times I've played DA:O. But I indeed can count how many I've played DA2: 1. And no plans to play again so far.

That made me decide that, apart from ME3, I'll probably never buy another Bioware game again.
User avatar
Yama Pi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:51 am

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 3:24 am

I have 2 gigs of ram thanks

http://shop.amd.com/US/_layouts/shop/ProductDetails.aspx?productID=100312SR®ion=us-en

...what? You need more than that!
User avatar
Luis Longoria
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:21 am

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:13 am

Yeah well, not to take sides, but when a game tries to please two sides with the same game, they kinda fail. Just to be clear, I own an xbox and a wii, don't even know if they still work cause I can't remember the last time i turned either of them on. What really bothers me is how they ... do things to keep the console players happy, cause let's face it, a game like this, on the console is, well, seeing other people making and enjoying mods, not fun. I really wish they don't pull crap like they did with New Vegas with the first DLC. And I would really hate it if they cut stuff that works on PC to make the console players feel better.
User avatar
Janette Segura
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:41 pm

I cannot count how many times I've played DA:O. But I indeed can count how many I've played DA2: 1. And no plans to play again so far.

That made me decide that, apart from ME3, I'll probably never buy another Bioware game again.


Haha I can't even count that high, I got about half way then just stopped out of pure boredom. I agree I lost all faith in Bioware after that.
User avatar
Elisha KIng
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:18 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:58 pm

Simple reason. The currently console generation is 6 years behind where technology is to date. The current generation of technology at the moment supports faster processors, higher level of graphics, more memory and overall more output. Consoles are not helping technology move forward, there are so many games which would of looked and played amazing if the technology actually increased. The PC started gaming, and it will continue to lead the consoles into the future of technology. At the moment, some people that use consoles believe their product is superior but yet they play on technology that is out of date and inefficient. An example is Direct X. The Xbox and PS3 currently support DX9 only, their systems cannot support any higher. Whilst those two consoles have been supporting DX9, PC have been through DX10 and we are now in DX11. Sure, all people notice is the graphics quality from Direct X, but it allows so much more. It allows better lighting, better shadows, better efficiency and anything related to graphical capabilities - whether that be what you see, or what is coded.

Consoles are dragging the chain in terms of advancing in technology. PC has and always will, lead gaming to new technology.
User avatar
Jessica Thomson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:10 am

Post » Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:11 pm

As a PC gamer I don't blame the consoles or the folks who prefer playing on them, to each their own. Really the blame for shortcomings of the PC ports falls to the developers who don't want to take the time to make the PC versions of their games true PC games and instead just port the console version directly with the same UI and specs of the consoles.

Some developers still take the time to actually put time into the PC version but it is becoming more and more of a rarity these days to see additional features graphically, UI modifications, etc. that are tailored for the PC version.

Even larger concerns are over optimizations like proper multi-core support, memory optimizations, 64 bit support, etc. that would make games run better on PC that aren't taken advantage of and can even make the game run worse if not done correctly (see FO:3 and the freezing issues with quad core CPU's).

Beth in general has done very poorly in their support of the PC versions their last 2 games. That's why it is such a heavy issue on this forum in particular.
User avatar
Austin Suggs
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:35 pm

Post » Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:26 am

................................ugh..............................................

1. I just don't want to have to go through all the settings
2. I play video games a lot but i don't want a whole bunch of complexity, if that makes me casual than awesome. And Steam being better than LIVE is your opinion.
3. To me you just seem to be a Microsoft hater. If the PS3 is better, that meaning Sony is better in your opinion, what do you call that massive dilema because PSN got hacked.
4. If you pumped the money into your computer to get it that good then expected games to match your expectations, that's your fault

I honestly don't think I have much more to say to you, you just seem like another person whp is obsessed with their computer and think you should have your every whim catered to.


Okay, simmer down, yo. Let's not have this thread closed on account of people not being able to just, you know, chill.

And how can one be a Microsoft "hater" when they're a PC gamer? Unless I'm playing The Sims or certain Valve titles, I'm probably playing on Windows.
User avatar
Ashley Hill
 
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:27 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim