In Bethesda's defense, though, it is annoying that only certain weapons could damage ghosts. What sense is there that daedric weapons could do it, but ebony can't? Or that silver can do it but elven can't? Or that an enchanted weapon of any type could do it, even if it had no charge?
It was sort of a silly rule. So while I do think they tend to follow a trend of ensuring the "safety" of their players, this one makes more sense than some other decisions they've made.
Makes more sense? Silly rule? That an ethereal being isn't hurt by physical contact? Are you serious? Have you ever played an RPG before?
Incorporeals have been made resistant/immune to physical attacks since the dawn of role-playing games like DnD 30+ years ago. Why should a being that can pass through objects, is dead, and exists without a physical form be hurt by just a plain stick of metal? You really don't understand that logic??
What sense is there that daedric and silver weapons can hurt them? According to TES lore, daedric and silver weapons are infused with magic or the essence of souls, thus making them more than just 'physical' weapons. The same goes for enchanted weapons. They hold arcane power within them which actually can 'touch' incorporeal bodies regardless of whether they hold enough charge to do their designed proc. If you deplete an enchanted weapons charge, do you have to go back and re-enchant it at an alter? No. The 'body' of the magic is still within the weapon, it just lacks the energy to perform the spell-on-hit.
*Sigh*
I often wonder how some people actually get themselves dressed in the morning.
