As I stated, I (as in myself personally) normally agree with Game Informer review because the things that they express they did not like with a game I find myself not liking in a game. Keep in mind, once again, that that is a personal choice that I make.
A guy who says that he got the game early (with no evidence mind you) and does nothing but say the game is a turd and his reasoning is "this game svcks do not buy" then I cannot take his "review" seriously because he hasn't told me why it is. A reviewer, of many sites and magazines, well give you a page of what he liked and did not like.
Then there is me. I have bought games that I in fact liked more then any review told me I would. This has not been the case all the time though. Many people like Bayonetta, as an example, but I do not even though it has a more than average review from places. It's not my bag.
The real moral is the only way that you will ever know if you truly like or dislike a game is to play it yourself and decide if you like it. I like, trust, and normally agree with Game Informer magazine and if they gave it a 1.0 out of 10 and gave me very good reasons and after more research decided the game was a turd, which I doubt it will be, then it may change my mind.