Why do people want to kill so much especially kids?

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:39 am

Personally if I even momentarily fantasized about killing a child, even in a game, I'd be worried as hell. Seriously.


Relax. It would be nice to put an arrow through some of the kids in this game because they're all snobby little brats. Doesn't mean I'm going to go on a rampage in my neighborhood.
User avatar
Shelby McDonald
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:29 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:34 pm

On a slightly off-topic note, Modern Warfare 3 has a scene where a child is killed in a toxic gas explosion. Seems they did it in such a way as to tip-toe around the AO rating.
User avatar
Danny Warner
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:26 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:02 am

I can't even bring myself to harvest the Little Sisters in Bioshock. Even though doing so would make my character "stronger", I just can't do it. (plus, you can't get the best ending if you harvest even one) The game "rewards" you for harvesting them by giving you more ADAM (you use it to buy new powers and abilities). If you save them, you get less ADAM on the spot, but you'll get extra rewards every time you save X amount of Little Sisters. Thing is, there are way more powers and abilities than you can even equip at once anyway, so getting less ADAM isn't really a problem (unless you're playing on harder difficulties, but I haven't tried).

That being said... I think the reason people don't like immortal kids, specifically in games where you can choose to be a serial killer, has more to do with the fact that you can't kill them "because it's wrong". Unlike in Bioshock, where you choose to either save them or kill them, based on your own judgment, and the game "rewards" you based on your choices. At least I hope that's all there is to it.

Bethesda doesn't allow killing children because it would change the rating of the game and take it off the shelves of most (legitimate) game sellers. There -are- video games allowing this sort of thing but they are largely banned.

They included children for a sense of realism (many complaints in MW and OB) but made them immortal to keep the game from being banned.


Bioshock says hello. It's only rated M.
User avatar
CHangohh BOyy
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:12 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:19 am

Because of the realism factor. Everyone should be mortal in their mind. Immortality svcks in RPGs, unless you have a Revive spell.
User avatar
Lory Da Costa
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:30 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:07 am

because you can't do it in the real world. I an't just go around killing everyone I don't like in the real world, so if I hate someone in a game, I recognize that I have the ability to kill them with no real consequences, so I do.

Make sense?
User avatar
Ysabelle
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:58 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:14 am

Bioshock added in to Harvest or Save the Little Sisters and that involves children.

This is my issue as a thief, I wondered into a home. A child was staring at me. I mean it was late at night 3am and their parents were asleep. Problem is you cannot have a witness system, if your witnesses are immortal insomniacs. I mean come on. Death is a part of life. Child or not.
User avatar
Lucie H
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:46 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:00 am

inb4lock

On the subject, while the kids are annoying, I'd be happy to just have a way to shut them up rather than have a couple blindly follow me around town spouting crap about how hard it is to sell fruits with her damn mother. Killing a child, even in game, is just despicable.
User avatar
Cayal
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:24 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:38 am

Nelkir needs to shut up. Permanently.
User avatar
Emmanuel Morales
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:27 am

they look dumb, they have annoying voice acting, and they always get in my way!
User avatar
jeremey wisor
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:12 pm

Relax. It would be nice to put an arrow through some of the kids in this game because they're all snobby little brats. Doesn't mean I'm going to go on a rampage in my neighborhood.

I mean...

How can one believe that? You're really suggesting that video game kids are more annoying than living ones? I mean you said "it would be nice" to kill one of them. Why? What would be "nice" about it?

In the game you can just run by them and ignore them. Their dialogue is more annoying than the guards, etc?

For people who say bad things happen to kids in real life...do you want the option to perform ALL the bad things that happen to kids? That's real too.

The issue isn't "it's just a game." It's what fantasies do the player have and what do they want to act out. The fact that it's a virtual world is irrelevant, IMO.
User avatar
Roddy
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:53 am

Because all children in the game act like spoiled brats or [censored]s.

I wanted to kill those 2 kids in the dragonreach in whiterun. They were brats. Well i joined the stormcloaks and took over whiterun. Now they live in a cellar in the blue palace.
User avatar
Lily
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:32 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:56 pm

Bioshock added in to Harvest or Save the Little Sisters and that involves children.

This is my issue as a thief, I wondered into a home. A child was staring at me. I mean it was late at night 3am and their parents were asleep. Problem is you cannot have a witness system, if your witnesses are immortal insomniacs. I mean come on. Death is a part of life. Child or not.


They could fix that by simply having them actually go to sleep. That's the best compromise.
User avatar
Karen anwyn Green
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:26 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:43 pm

Why ? Four reasons.

- Arbitrarily immortal characters are annoying by concept alone. If you're going to aim for freedom of action, why put immortality in play ?
- It's fun to kill things in a game. You obviously can't nor should do it in real life. It's one of the pleasure of a game to allow you to do what you can't IRL.
- Children are very, very, very often extremely annoying in most of the game and fictions. Making them immortal is just like scratching an itch and taunting you.
- More than anything, it's the hypocrisy. Hypocrisy like the huge one you display in your sanctimonious and self-righteous bullcrap. 90 % of all the games are about killing foes. In the REGULAR COURSE of the game, you kill TONS of people. Roasting them alive, using them as living pincushion, capturing their sould and animating their remains. All this seems fair game and fun in a game. But you do this to a sprite with the appearance of a kid, and suddendly the dumb moral guardians start screeching. Annoying and hypocrital as hell.
User avatar
Sophie Morrell
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:13 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:42 am

Because its my game and I should be able to kill whoever I want.
User avatar
SexyPimpAss
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:24 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:29 am

I mean...

How can one believe that? You're really suggesting that video game kids are more annoying than living ones? I mean you said "it would be nice" to kill one of them. Why? What would be "nice" about it?

In the game you can just run by them and ignore them. Their dialogue is more annoying than the guards, etc?

For people who say bad things happen to kids in real life...do you want the option to perform ALL the bad things that happen to kids? That's real too.

The issue isn't "it's just a game." It's what fantasies do the player have and what do they want to act out. The fact that it's a virtual world is irrelevant, IMO.

I hope you understand that just because I want to do something in a game doesn't mean I want to do it in the real world, much like how my game morals don't reflect my real-life morals. I don't hate kids, and I'd never want to kill one in real life (not without an exceptional reason, anyways). Now if I can kill old men, women, and every other breathing thing in Skyrim, why not kids? What, just because they're young?
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:27 pm

If you don't like killing kids, don't. The fact that the choice has been removed in a game whose strength is supposed to be choice is pretty lame.

I also love how the OP seems fine with the rest of the wholesale slaughter that takes place in the game. Won't someone think of the poor children (read: attention [censored] parents)!
User avatar
tiffany Royal
 
Posts: 3340
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:41 am

It's a game. Repeat that three times. You're just as wacko as those people who thought D&D was satanic.


LoL

If I told you the food you eat was a child, would you stop eating?
This is a game folks, games are made of zeros, and ones. Smashing one zero, into another one does not mean you are psycho.

<(" <)<( " )>(> ")>
Kirby Approved MSG

User avatar
Theodore Walling
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:24 am

I always thought the reason people wanted to kill kids was because the game let's you do whatever you want. That's the appeal of the elder scrolls. I understand why you can't kill kids(but I don't understand why people want to). I mean if you could kill kids(still don't know why you would) then Fox News would come out of nowhere and say some stupid **** about the game that is not true because they are evil. I mean really, they are evil.
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:27 am

I just think everyone should have DO NOT CROSS line in their head. Even when it comes to fantasy.

I mean if a game gave you an opportunity to [censored] your mom (in-game) would you do it? Would you complain that you didn't even have the option?

I'm sorry, I just don't have faith in humanity. People who casually justify their fantasies as "it's just a game" is troubling. If someone is rationalizing murdering kids for RP or immersion reasons thats...disturbing, IMO.

I'm just surprised that so many players want the option.


How is killing children any less inhumane than killing an advlt... Real life or video game ? If you're disturbed for thinking about killing kids, but not innocent mothers and fathers, you are the disturbed one. Nice try on trying to look like a decent person and bash others, but you are more foolish than any one else here. You are so misinformed and naive, it makes me feel sorry for anyone that is part of your real life. So judgemental, its sickening.
User avatar
Cassie Boyle
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:33 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 11:57 am

I mean...

How can one believe that? You're really suggesting that video game kids are more annoying than living ones? I mean you said "it would be nice" to kill one of them. Why? What would be "nice" about it?

In the game you can just run by them and ignore them. Their dialogue is more annoying than the guards, etc?

For people who say bad things happen to kids in real life...do you want the option to perform ALL the bad things that happen to kids? That's real too.

The issue isn't "it's just a game." It's what fantasies do the player have and what do they want to act out. The fact that it's a virtual world is irrelevant, IMO.


I think it's the only thing that is relevant. I've also laughed as I used Unrelenting Force to toss my wife around the room after she told me she didn't have any food to give me. Should my real wife save the trouble and just go to a battered wives shelter now? When GTA3 came out, tons of people never even bothered with the campaign, but just went on shooting sprees to see how long they could live. Haven't really noticed an uptick in car thefts and hoker deaths since then, have you?

Sorry, I think this psychobabble that there's a link between game violence and real violence, or that how a player acts in a virtual environment gives you a look into their soul, is pure rubbish. Myself and millions of others played Doom growing up - two kids who played shot up a school, and now we have to hear this crap every time there's violence in a video game, or someone talks about wishing they could do something violent in a video game. They're games. That's all.
User avatar
Mimi BC
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:30 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:38 pm

its just a game for crying out loud.

if you are not happy for those that wants to kill kids, i recomend you to stop playing this game, or any other game, because its full of violence anyway.
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:56 pm

The answer is a fiction designed to organize the impoverished into a single entity that ensures the legacy of those who would maintain absolute power over the lower classes, in theory for an infinite amount of time. This great work continues through present day to shape and warp the minds of countless millions of people. The utopic ideals found in this fiction are used to manipulate the human instinct to pass on cultural behaviors by injecting synthetic behaviors in familiar patterns. The eventuality of this cultural programming is wide reaching. Some of these symptoms include the censorship of popular media (paintings, statues, melodic works of sound, written works, visual works, simulated works, thoughts, ideas, beliefs...etc), the siphoning of resources into superhubs, and the eventual violent elimination of those who refuse to conform to these conditions.
User avatar
Natalie J Webster
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:35 pm

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:20 am

It's funny how all these people who say "it's just a game" turn their tail and run for the first rock, so they can throw it at people who mention sixuality in games.
User avatar
Alexandra Ryan
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:09 am

I just think everyone should have DO NOT CROSS line in their head. Even when it comes to fantasy.

I mean if a game gave you an opportunity to [censored] your mom (in-game) would you do it? Would you complain that you didn't even have the option?

I'm sorry, I just don't have faith in humanity. People who casually justify their fantasies as "it's just a game" is troubling. If someone is rationalizing murdering kids for RP or immersion reasons thats...disturbing, IMO.

I'm just surprised that so many players want the option.



ROFL way to compare [censored] your mom and killing random little annoying [censored]-bag on the street.
User avatar
Connie Thomas
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:58 am

Post » Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:13 am

It's funny how all these people who say "it's just a game" turn their tail and run for the first rock, so they can throw it at people who mention sixuality in games.


are you playing real life in skyrim ?
User avatar
Olga Xx
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:31 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim