Quoted from UESP wiki "Khajiit, like Argonians, make good thieves due to their bonuses in skills typically associated with stealth-oriented classes". Now seems to me that they are basing an entire combat class on theiving, which as I said; is near damn useless.
First, they're not basing any
Combat class on thieving: it's a
Stealth class.
Yes yes I know they said stealth-oriented. But still they reffer stealth characters as theives, which is wrong.
It's no more wrong than referring to them as Assassins,
like somebody suggested, would be. Thieving, like a "certain other" profession, is one of the oldest occupations in existence. As such, it tends to be used as the archetype for stealth and sneakiness. I'd say all the Monks and Pilgrims who are born under the Thief birthsign don't mind the association at all, since it means the same thing: "I get in, do what I'm there for, and get out with nobody ever knowing I was there."
Not everyone born under the Mage birthsign is a Mage.
Not everyone born under the Atronach is an Atronach.
Not everyone born under the Steed is a horse.