» Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:11 am
100% agree. EA is the reason the PC audience got **** over as well.
No.. they aren't. PC Gamers are clearly that stupid and you are the top of the list. First off, before I thrash you with the money issues, Battlefield 3 will be PC first with 64 player servers and EA is going to spend $100m to market it. Well, umm, doesn't that rip up the whole EA reason? YES IT DOES.
Think for two seconds: How much is a Xbox 360? It's $300 for it, controller, headset, all the cables, and even a crappy free game and that's JUST FOR $300. How much is a PC? It's $300 alone for a good video card.. then you have the case, motherboard, RAM, DVD-Drive, PSU, cables, keyboard N mouse, and... well lots of other stuff. If you wanted to save money.... what would you do?
Heck, alone my gaming rig cost well over $1000. I use the same $330 monitor for my 360 and, well, if it wasn't for my love for tech, I would have given up on PC gaming awhile back. It's a lot cheaper to play on the 360 and there's a larger player base... so it's stupid to argue that any publisher is killing PC gaming when the money and the consumer speak louder than ANY company in the damn world.
Face it: It's more cost effective as a consumer to have a console. Until a gaming rig costs less than a console and looks better comes out and piracy is dealt with, PC gaming will always be dying. Wait, lemme answer that question because such a thing does exist: a console. Now that's using a god damn business degree. >_>
Fun fact, when pirates use the argument of "Well, games cost to much" you can smack them with that same argument.
By the way, a lot of people had expectations for Crysis two. Huge expectations. Were those met? They met a lot but certainly not the communities as a whole. Why would you make the same stupid blanket assumption about yet another game you haven't played yet? And how does that rip up anything? There's not a single fact. l o l Oh because they're throwing money at their marketing department? How does that have anything to do with proving anyone wrong here? It actually proves everyone here correct. They are very unwise with their funds when it comes to satisfaction but keen on profits. 100,000,000 is nothing if they can sell more than 1,666,666 copies at 60$.(Under the assumption that you're not making that number up.)
Your whole pc / console argument is inane. It doesn't even include that importance a PC has in a household and the lack thereof for the console. The marketed age for a console is selective too. Meaning, it's far more likely that any consumer will have a PC over a console. It's far more likely that they will WANT to buy a PC as well. Also, they will use it far more frequently because they have more than a single use for the technology.