will i get banned? i just bought this game.

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:17 am

Those are not exclusive.

Grow up, is my opinion.

User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:33 pm

You will not get banned

User avatar
chinadoll
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:09 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:42 am


Oh PUHLEAZE! You used the term in a derogatory context. Don't insult anybody's intelligence by pretending otherwise
User avatar
Rachel Tyson
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:42 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:29 am

Context is not really assuming. That is reading the conversation progression and interpreting what was said.

User avatar
Chloe Botham
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:11 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:36 pm

That's the hardest thing to teach teenagers. Our actions and mannerisms aren't about what WE intend them to be, but in how they are perceived by others. Personal intent has no weight in any court of law outside of proving the intent of murder to make the punishment more severe.

This becomes a more evident lesson when people travel abroad. My Marines had the hardest time understanding this. So we showed them a video where some gate guards were telling a vehicle to stop (holding up their hands, palm out, and yelling stop) and the vehicle kept approaching. In the end, they opened fire. The culprit?

'Hand up, palm out' meant 'proceed' in that country. The guards were punished for not listening to the cultural brief and essentially murdering civilians who were simply following instructions.

The guards intended no harm at all.

User avatar
ruCkii
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:08 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:06 am

still, technically assuming. ;) technically!

User avatar
victoria gillis
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:26 pm

correct. which is a form of assumption. common sense...

User avatar
Hella Beast
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:50 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:24 am

My advice is if you don't like what people are saying in chat, use the ignore option. As someone already stated.

User avatar
Judy Lynch
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:31 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:51 am

Unless we're talking about numbers, all forms of communication is based on assumptions. Sorry to say, there is no universal language.

When I say 'I want a coke', where I live, they ask me what type: Dr Pepper or Pepsi. But in North Carolina, if I say 'I want a coke', they bring me a Coca Cola, or at best, ask me 'diet or regular'.

Even body language is based on assumptions.

User avatar
Celestine Stardust
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:22 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:48 am

How about this.....if you did get banned for it, you would not win your appeal argument. Much like you are attempting to do on this thread.

User avatar
Darlene DIllow
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:13 pm

Only in America is that word banned ? Over in the UK a [censored] is another name for a ciggy or a bundle of wood. Can also mean a piece of fish if my memory serves me correct.

User avatar
Robyn Howlett
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:01 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 pm

that's unfortunately unfair. because honestly, it still is technically assuming. also, like the others have said do you really think they would ban for a first offense of me calling others some sticks?

User avatar
Jessica Stokes
 
Posts: 3315
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:01 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 am

I will say this: the person who believed your side of the story? I would have no respect for.

User avatar
x a million...
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:59 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:19 am

Yes that's true. And in no way would be used as an insult in this context, as it was clearly being used as a derogatory remark.

*oops quoted wrong post

User avatar
Jessica Lloyd
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:57 am

Let me educate you on something. In-game, you are only a guest. You are renting time in a private domain, just like if you went into a restaurant or a theme park. It is private owned, and their rules are their rules. Your interpretation of an incident does not matter- if you use a word that is widely considered to be derogatory, regardless of what other definitions the word has, you can be asked to leave, because that's part of the rules.

Perhaps the effort you're using to explain your behavior would be better used to expand your vocabulary and maturity level.

User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:13 am

OMG THIS GUY. I was calling them ciggys and wood! see! he gets it! nothing bad here!!! come on guys! i'm serious! i'm from the uk and i was calling them wood!!!

User avatar
George PUluse
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:20 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:56 am

you have no respect for unbiased people? like the other guy said read what i said above^ in the uk they call it wood! i'm from the uk!

User avatar
Eduardo Rosas
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:02 am

I think we're done here. You're clearly trying to talk yourself out of a situation.

User avatar
Spaceman
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:09 am

Post » Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:18 pm

Stop playing with words OP and trying to claim you meant something else, as Talaran said earlier you will get a warning here for it and also for avoiding our forum word censor - as you have "technically" done so in the first post.

Leave it at that.

User avatar
herrade
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:09 pm

Previous

Return to Othor Games