Will six and love be returning to the wasteland?

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:23 pm

If I can get a benefit from this then I want it in the game.

-If I can make a baby that will slowly grow up to be a advlt and able to follow/kill with me. Then yes.
-Or if I don't want the child, I can go to a slave town to sell him off.
User avatar
Marlo Stanfield
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:00 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:43 pm

First of all, it's a damn fallout, there always was (until FO3) six, and even more erotic things like being a porm star even without seeing you doing it.
Second of all, fallout nv is in the VEGAS! It's the city of six.
So there must be something to do with six, like being a porm star or having six with prosttutes (but I don't need to see my character doing it, but I wouldn't mind seeing it).
But I don't want strip clubs make my screen black when I come in. And they MUST be in game. xD
And there must be some six easter egg, and erotic dialogues, because it's vegas.

-If I can make a baby that will slowly grow up to be a advlt and able to follow/kill with me. Then yes.

So you will play that game for 18 years?
User avatar
daniel royle
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 8:44 am

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:50 pm

If I can get a benefit from this then I want it in the game.

-If I can make a baby that will slowly grow up to be a advlt and able to follow/kill with me. Then yes.
-Or if I don't want the child, I can go to a slave town to sell him off.


don't think i would go that far as talking about children. It would raise again moral questions that are best avoided such as the killing children topic that was surrounding the making of fallout 3. (and yet i belive that selling them to slavery is much crueler).
besides the main thing about fallout for me is not knowing exactly how your actions will effect the world and seeing it in the end. it takes allot of time for this pesky little things to grow.

i do agree that sixual content should be brought back to the game in the way that it was suggested in this thread.
fade to black with effect on the game
User avatar
Erika Ellsworth
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:52 am

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 12:33 pm

don't think i would go that far as talking about children. It would raise again moral questions that are best avoided such as the killing children topic that was surrounding the making of fallout 3. (and yet i belive that selling them to slavery is much crueler).

I just don't like what bethesda did, fallout was the world of cruelty and vulgarity.
And bethesda changed that a lot in the fallout 3, and possibly in every future fallout game.
User avatar
Laura
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:11 am

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:20 pm

I just wanted to add that in Dragon Age Awakening the character "Mother" shows all 12 of her [censored].
Oh and if they're going to put in some sixual themes I hope they don't recycle stuff from F1 or F2.
I could go either way (har har har, bi-joke), I'm fine with having sixual themes and I'm fine with not being there aswell.
Isn't really my main focus.
Were'nt in F1 or F2 either, slept with a crime boss' daughter once, that's it. :/
User avatar
Tom
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:39 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:20 pm

Just to be weird, I once made a 16 year old girl (the youngest you can make a character) with the six Appeal trait, basically a teenage [censored], and I tried to see how many six options I got, beneficial or not. And that was fun. Though weird. Poor little pixel girl. Well, she at least got a cut price for Vic when buying him out from the slavers. Yay! I also tried to hire a prosttute, but she said "I don't do girls" :(

Oh, and the Kama Sutra perk in Fallout 2! Hehehe, damn. When you're gonna get information out from that mob boss' wife, that perk did help. And I liked the description you got when it faded back from black again, I don't remember exactly what it said but it was a little poetic. Something like "it wasn't the best six you've experiences, nor the longest, but for a brief moment you became one blah blah". Then you're gonna ask her questions about her husbands business and she falls asleep after like the first question. But if you had the Kama Sutra perk you would "love long and passionate" and she says something like "that was the best I've ever had" and she stays awak way longer for you to question her.


That six stuff was actually fun. These were just some extreme examples, like you could also star in a porm movie, but more six references at all please! Just more than in Fallout 3 and nothing graphical, it's all about what the dialogue indicates, both before and after. "Fade to black" always work for these features, and I don't mean the Metallica song. I'd also like to get what I want by using six in a quest. Coz playing a female character rules!
User avatar
Kelly James
 
Posts: 3266
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:33 pm

Post » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:42 am

its an 18 anyway, the nearest you have to brothels is in majoritys bar and that ghoul prosttute in underworld, tho luckly for the lone wanderer you cant make him sleep with her! lol
User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm

Post » Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:34 am

I just don't like what bethesda did, fallout was the world of cruelty and vulgarity.
And bethesda changed that a lot in the fallout 3, and possibly in every future fallout game.


In case you didn't notice, the developer(s) that created the IP in question here are bankrupt and disbanded. Bethesda has every right (having purchased said IP) to not include any content from the original IP that might jeopardize their quite successful standing in the gaming industry and leave themselves in the same boat as Interplay/Black Isle. I'm not saying that said content is responsible for their demise but rather, Bethesda is smart enough not to take that risk. I'll support that decision so long as we are allowed to mod in those aspects that we expect from Fallout.
User avatar
Emily Shackleton
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am

I just love how parents complain about their kids getting games like this for advlts and then complaining that it has advlt Content when the cashier asks if you are awares its rated M, and it states it on the back.
User avatar
carly mcdonough
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:23 am

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:44 pm

Oh, I thought up one!

The Courier: I'd like to "carry" your "package" if you know what I'm saying. :hubbahubba:

I just came up with the worst joke ever. Do I get a prize?
User avatar
Marlo Stanfield
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:00 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:20 pm

Oh, I thought up one!

The Courier: I'd like to "carry" your "package" if you know what I'm saying. :hubbahubba:

I just came up with the worst joke ever. Do I get a prize?


You get a bobblehead thats says Joker wearing a jester hat
User avatar
Theodore Walling
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:01 pm

If I can get a benefit from this then I want it in the game.

-If I can make a baby that will slowly grow up to be a advlt and able to follow/kill with me. Then yes.
-Or if I don't want the child, I can go to a slave town to sell him off.


ok lets get this straight this game shouldn't remind me of fable2.babies in fallout would just be a catastrophe for me and other people.
not too crazy on relationships in games either...
User avatar
jessica Villacis
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:03 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:56 pm

I'm not opposed to a little six here and there. Bethesda and Obsidian can do with it what they will~ six is not as important as making characters you can actually form those kind of Player-Digital Entity relationships with, by my own opinion.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:16 pm

it's rated m for mature ,be 17 years old to by it. it's like if someone bought a movie called blood svcking freaks then complained that their child was scared
User avatar
Ricky Meehan
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:42 pm

Post » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:06 am

Getting married, becoming a pormstar, and having the game imply that you were [censored] by a Super Mutant are mature themes? They seemed pretty immature to me, not to mention pretty boring as I ignored all 3 features in F2.


They are mature themes as in "advlt" themes. Themes that you don't want people under 18 getting involved in. But that's the nice thing about an rpg like Fallout, it's all choice. You don't have to mess around with that content, but if you want to you can. But the thing is it's there if you want it.


I just don't like what bethesda did, fallout was the world of cruelty and vulgarity.
And bethesda changed that a lot in the fallout 3, and possibly in every future fallout game.


Aye, it was a harsh world where people struggled to survive and rebuild. Fallout 3 was a pathetic wasteland where people didn't eek out a survival they just hid in shacks and died. No rebuilding, no farming, no nothing. Shady Sands in F1 was more representitive of the general themes of the setting than anything in F3. Along with the removal of sixual themes it felt like they understood part of what defines a Post-apoc setting (struggle for survival and living of the ruins) but missed the parts that give it life (people trying to rebuild, people living their lives in this abnormal world, etc).

In case you didn't notice, the developer(s) that created the IP in question here are bankrupt and disbanded. Bethesda has every right (having purchased said IP) to not include any content from the original IP that might jeopardize their quite successful standing in the gaming industry and leave themselves in the same boat as Interplay/Black Isle. I'm not saying that said content is responsible for their demise but rather, Bethesda is smart enough not to take that risk. I'll support that decision so long as we are allowed to mod in those aspects that we expect from Fallout.


Yeah, not quite. While it's their property and they can do anything with it (they could make it about flying ponies if they wanted), if they change too much, the game's not Fallout anymore. And that's something I felt they got dangerously close to with Fallout 3. Plus Interplay fell because of bad investment decisions and a string of [censored] games. Not because of mature content in their games. Games that won awards, made tons of money and built up a fanbase that made it a juicy pick for Bethesda later on.
That and I don't think them removing the sixual content was done to avoid a risk. This is the game that had slow motion fatality shots where you ripped someone's head off and saw the decapitated lumpspinning through the air with full graphic shots of the bloody, gorey hole complete with esophagus. Rather I think it was that they're just uncomfortable with any romantic/sixual content. Look at most of their games up till now. There's pretty much nothing even regarding light romantic themes in either Morrowind or Oblivion. And when it was added in little bits to Fallout 3 it was done very amateurishly compared to how they handled other aspects of the game (pretty well in my opinion). It was like they realized that you can't have a Fallout game without sixual themes, so they threw in little hints to make people happy if they asked, and then ignored it.
There was alot of opertunity too, especially in the DLC. You have a ufo abduction setting and a backwoods swamp setting and no bad six jokes.
User avatar
ZzZz
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:56 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:18 pm

It's there in Fallout 3, it's simply a bit subdued a bit. Such as a moment you offer someone to 'plow two bean fields' if you have the Black Widow perk and Nova at Moriarty's who'll lend you a room with a wink and a nudge.

Not a straight up pormographic scene, but it encourges a a few laughs.

If New Vegas has too much sixual content, Fox News is gonna have a story run on it for a whole week exclaiming video games are teaching our kids to have six with prosttutes.
So I'm going to say maybe a few more sixual references than Fallout3, but not too over the top.


Fox news will run the story, which will blow it ouy of proportion. The extra publicity would generate buzz for the game. Then, when they are forced to retract their idiotic, based-on-nothing story, the bad publicity will be gone while the good will stay. WIN NV.
User avatar
Natalie J Webster
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:35 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:18 pm

Well, yeah~~ And no one really listens to Jack Thompson anymore. He's like an old man on his porch, trying to get people to listen to his stories of working at the Hot Dog stand.
User avatar
Emilie Joseph
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:28 am

Post » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:37 am

having a soulmate would be ok.I probably will just end up killing her.Being a pimp would be ight. :disguise:
User avatar
gandalf
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:57 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:42 pm

it is vegas :evil:
User avatar
Wane Peters
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:22 pm

IT'S TRUE!!!
THEY DO WANT US TO BE LONELY.....
I'm gonna end up a Crazy old Cat Lady.....



But srsly..that was another thing I didn't like...past lvl 6 I don't think I ever went annywhere without a companion.....I wasn't ALONE.....SO WTH is up with calling us the lone wanderer...it doesn't actually fit the title they gave the last PCs in the Games.
The Vault Dweller (obvious)
The Chosen One (you are awesome!)
The Lone Wanderer? (crazy old cat lady pushing a shopping cart)

in this new one, you are the courrier...they should give us the ability to have romance since the whole "lone" status is taken away.....


:rofl: Too true, good thing Fallout 3 ended the way it did, ignoring Broken Steel, circumvents the whole problem. I think I read somewhere that you can have a few more followers in NV. In one of the magazines, can't remember which one, it was a friend's. But anyway, it would be nice to have some more followers and some good humor.
User avatar
April D. F
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:41 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:07 pm

At least 'six' like in GTA IV with Michelle where you don't actually see anything but hear sounds like moans and talking.
User avatar
rolanda h
 
Posts: 3314
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:09 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:06 pm

I think I read somewhere that you can have a few more followers in NV. In one of the magazines, can't remember which one, it was a friend's. But anyway, it would be nice to have some more followers and some good humor.


That'd be nice and a return to the older games. What I really hope is that they make the follower system work better. From some of the previews it does look like we'll have more control over companions. The trick will be to make sure they don't kill each other.
I'd also like some more obvious humor. The subtlety of Fallout 3 was not my style of humor. I prefered the more obvious and silly humor of the earlier games. I miss the silly random encounters too.
User avatar
Lauren Denman
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:29 am

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:26 pm

At least 'six' like in GTA IV with Michelle where you don't actually see anything but hear sounds like moans and talking.


No. Just a fade to black and back with passage of time would be sufficient. Maybe how much time passed is determined by your stamina... Stam 1, 5 minutes. Stam 10, 2 hours. lol
User avatar
Bloomer
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:37 pm

They are mature themes as in "advlt" themes. Themes that you don't want people under 18 getting involved in. But that's the nice thing about an rpg like Fallout, it's all choice. You don't have to mess around with that content, but if you want to you can. But the thing is it's there if you want it.


I know, I just wanted to make it clear that I thought those things were pretty silly, and not among the features that I thought made Fallout 2 good. If Obsidian can release the game with "six" without cutting other content then fine; but I'd really hope they don't try to squeeze any romance into the MQ or anything. I think they did a good job with Amata by giving the player a choice to have their character care about her or not, and that was as far as it went. No chick-flick stuff was thrown in.
User avatar
Gavin Roberts
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:14 pm

Post » Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:29 pm

I dont know why they are worried about sixual content. In GTA IV lost and damned dlc their was a nvde male scene with the corrupt congressman. And i heard nothing of it on the news. Seriously, if wang can be in games most certainly nice plump boobies can too.
User avatar
Rodney C
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:54 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas