Will Skyrim Be On HD-DVD, Blu-Ray and/or multiple DVDs?

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:06 pm

Maybe because my PC has a blu-ray drive and I don't enjoy fiddling around with multiple discs during the install?

I would also like to not need the disc every time I play the game. Idk have the installer create like a 256-bit encrypted key in a hidden folder or something.

Dual layer DVD holds 9.4GB More then most any game needs by todays standards. Few games actually spill over to more then 1 DVD Skyrim sure as hell wont be one of them.
User avatar
Janette Segura
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:14 pm

Problem is a lot of 360s didn't have hard drives

This.

And what is "zero-day platform locking"?
User avatar
Alina loves Alexandra
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:55 pm

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:53 am

Few games actually spill over to more then 1 DVD Skyrim sure as hell wont be one of them.

I GUARANTEE you Skyrim will be 2 DVDs minimum.
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:03 pm

Dual layer DVD holds 9.4GB More then most any game needs by todays standards. Few games actually spill over to more then 1 DVD Skyrim sure as hell wont be one of them.

Then why was Mass Effect 2?
User avatar
Causon-Chambers
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:47 pm

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:42 pm

He doesn't know what he's talking about. Skyrim will be like 12 to 15 GB, more than any single DVD can hold.
User avatar
Patrick Gordon
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 5:38 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:58 am

I GUARANTEE you Skyrim will be 2 DVDs minimum.

Good thing I'm playing on PS3.
User avatar
roxxii lenaghan
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:53 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:35 pm

Good thing I'm playing on PS3.

Yeah, but it won't support a full install, which means slower load times.
User avatar
Kelly Osbourne Kelly
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:56 pm

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:04 am

I dont want hours to install, I am taking the day off work and will have to wait until 8.45 when the kids leave for school to play it so I want to be running round in the snow chased by dragons by 9.30 latest.

I have no idea why, but this made me chuckle.

But on topic, while I hope that the game is massive, I doubt it will be as using multiple disks on a sandbox style game like Skyrim would kill the Xbox version.


... not that I care, because I'm getting the PC version, but still, Bethesda wouldn't do that. They care way too much about the Xbox. Mine is just gathering dust.
User avatar
biiibi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:39 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:54 pm

The blu-ray on PS3 reads a lot slower then the 360s DVD drive. Which is why they have redundant data on the discs,its why MGS filled the blu ray. It was not tons of epic gameplay,it was just hours of video plus redundant data.Blu-rays space advantage is nonsense for games.
User avatar
Elea Rossi
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:02 am

He doesn't know what he's talking about. Skyrim will be like 12 to 15 GB, more than any single DVD can hold.


How can you claim to know more than him?? Unless you're partial to some sort of industrial espionage the rest of us haven't been informed of, then you can't say that for certain. Judging by the fact the heightmap will be the same sort of size as Oblivion (we have been told this), thus unless they make a crazy amount of high poly meshes and high res textures, there's no way they could reach 12 GB. And seeing as it's still the same hardware (albeit improved engine this time round), it won't be massively massively bigger than Oblivion. And if worse comes to worse then they'll just give the 360 even lower res textures.

EDIT:

@thatkhajiitbock, that's just nonsense now. Not debating your points about MGS (because I don't know either way), but more space means better textures and in the case of TES, a larger game world. My Oblivion folder on PC, complete with all of my mods, is 26GB. And I've seen bigger folders. You can't tell me all of that is redundant, and if you try then you clearly have no idea :D
User avatar
Emily Shackleton
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:50 pm

If it really came down to it like that.(it wont) The high res textures could be put on another disc or certain end game content moved to another disc to make room then installed.
User avatar
Nikki Lawrence
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:27 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:49 pm

If it really came down to it like that.(it wont) The high res textures could be put on another disc or certain end game content moved to another disc to make room then installed.


Problem is a lot of 360s didn't have hard drives, or very small ones at that. Which I imagine is a large enough market for Bethesda to not want to miss out on. Because it's such an open, non-linear game world as well, it's not like you could just swap discs half way through either.

User avatar
Céline Rémy
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:53 pm

The blu-ray on PS3 reads a lot slower then the 360s DVD drive. Which is why they have redundant data on the discs,its why MGS filled the blu ray. It was not tons of epic gameplay,it was just hours of video plus redundant data.Blu-rays space advantage is nonsense for games.

MGS4 uses uncompressed PCM audio in like 7.1 dolby, that is why it filled the disc. 360 games have redundant data as well, the speed of it's DVD drive over the PS3's blu-ray is negligible. The PS3 can juggle a lot more information simultaneously. Neither of the drives are comparable to 7200-10000 RPM hard disk.
User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:46 am

I hope its many disk's for 360 user :celebration: And the PS3 users get Blu-ray 1 disk....


And PC :sadvaultboy: Gets to pre install with better textures and maybe HDR and AA.... :sadvaultboy:
User avatar
Vickey Martinez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:32 am

How can you claim to know more than him?? Unless you're partial to some sort of industrial espionage the rest of us haven't been informed of, then you can't say that for certain. Judging by the fact the heightmap will be the same sort of size as Oblivion (we have been told this), thus unless they make a crazy amount of high poly meshes and high res textures, there's no way they could reach 12 GB. And seeing as it's still the same hardware (albeit improved engine this time round), it won't be massively massively bigger than Oblivion. And if worse comes to worse then they'll just give the 360 even lower res textures.

EDIT:

@thatkhajiitbock, that's just nonsense now. Not debating your points about MGS (because I don't know either way), but more space means better textures and in the case of TES, a larger game world. My Oblivion folder on PC, complete with all of my mods, is 26GB. And I've seen bigger folders. You can't tell me all of that is redundant, and if you try then you clearly have no idea :D


How fast is your BDD on your PC because the way the PS3's works it would require one hell of a pre install. Also what I mean by redundant is it has the same files packed together to make up for the slow drive so about 20% of the disc is taken up by this "redundant" extra files. like when you play cod online the character and gun models stuff(mesh ect) has a copy for each map,so it becomes less effective the more data you have,the more redundant data you need so it can stream from the disc properly.
User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:17 am

Blu-rays space advantage is nonsense for games.

Please stop spreading lies.
User avatar
Kristina Campbell
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:05 pm

How fast is your BDD on your PC because the way the PS3's works it would require one hell of a pre install. Also what I mean by redundant is it has the same files packed together to make up for the slow drive so about 20% of the disc is taken up by this "redundant" extra files. like when you play cod online the character and gun models stuff(mesh ect) has a copy for each map,so it becomes less effective the more data you have,the more redundant data you need so it can stream from the disc properly.


My HDD is 7200 rpm. Not sure how this compares. And surely redundant data means it's less efficient because it has to search through all that extra stuff to find it?? You could be right, but even still bigger discs (at least for me being a PC user) means more game. Or better textures etc.
User avatar
Haley Cooper
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:30 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:44 pm

MGS4 uses uncompressed PCM audio in like 7.1 dolby, that is why it filled the disc. 360 games have redundant data as well, the speed of it's DVD drive over the PS3's blu-ray is negligible. The PS3 can juggle a lot more information simultaneously. Neither of the drives are comparable to 7200-10000 RPM hard disk.

Your right,I'am going off of old info.
User avatar
lolli
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:42 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:41 am

The data transfer of my 4x BD drive is 18 MB/s, where the 360's 12x DVD drive is only 16.5. An 8x BD drive is 36 MB/s.
User avatar
Flutterby
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:28 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:59 pm

If they optimize for the BD on PS3 then the load times should be fine. Uncharted 2 had one load screen so It might have more to do with how they get it optimized and running.
User avatar
Conor Byrne
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:37 pm

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:57 pm

If they optimize for the BD on PS3 then the load times should be fine. Uncharted 2 had one load screen so It might have more to do with how they get it optimized and running.

I'm almost positive the PS3 version will support a partial install to improve load times, not really concerned about that. I was just hoping they would release a PC version on blu-ray, but it's unlikely due to production costs of BD vs. DVD.
User avatar
Ludivine Poussineau
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:49 pm

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:40 am

Maybe if they charge a little more for a BD version for PC.
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:42 am

I saw HD-DVD and laughed.
User avatar
Gavin Roberts
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:14 pm

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:02 pm

Yea it costs pennies per dvd these days. I just want to play Skyrim now idc if I have to use 10 CD's or low res textures.
User avatar
Eric Hayes
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:50 pm

Then why was Mass Effect 2?

Last I checked Mass Effect has hundreds of hours of voice files. TES is not the kind of game where you make a lot of morally conflicting dialog choices requiring a unique response to each choice. And unless they plan on giving the player a voice in Skyrim, you can cut out all the PC voice files. Bringing the expected file size well below the 15GB that ME2 had
User avatar
Sian Ennis
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:46 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim