Will the Dragonborn have specal suit of armor once he/ is co : V - Skyrim

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:08 pm

I doubt we'll be able to become king/queen. Or rather emperor/empress.

The current emperor/empress is probably a descendant from that Titus Mede guy, and will probably not appear in the game at all. If he/she will, it will most likely be a small "cameo".
With an Empire on the decline, I doubt he/she will leave the Imperial City - she/he will more likely send her/his agents to Skyrim to handle the civil war and the dragon threat.

That's just pure speculation, of course.

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:37 pm

No we won't become emporer of the Empire(whats left of it), and no we won't become king of Skyrim.

/Thread.

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:00 pm

The Dragon Born isn't going to become king/queen. There would be a HUEG mess with the lore. Was he/she Nord, Breton, Imperial, maybe even Khajiit? They'd need to fix this, like they did with the Warp in the West. So no, most likey it won't happen.

I will bet my life for the dragonborn not becoming a "king of cyrodiil"

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:20 pm

I might as well become King or Queen of Cyrodil if I'm going to be the head of the Mages Guild, Thieves Guild, Fighters Guild, Dark Brotherhood, etc.

» Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:22 am

if the player becomes king, something along the lines of all records of said king were destroyed and/or lost. But that would svck, to never know a thing about the last character you made. Or else the emperor was killed on his coronation, and the body lost before he could even be revealed, with rumors growing like wildfire of what he was like from all accounts. Would still feel cop out and cliche. Just no to such high positions of power. Just no.

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:49 pm

will form my understanding the locket of kings can only be used by a dragonborn wo form that logic alone our dragonborn should be named the new king cos they have not hade real king in 200 years

being king of skyrim has NOTHING to do with the amulet of kings.

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:25 pm

will form my understanding the locket of kings can only be used by a dragonborn wo form that logic alone our dragonborn should be named the new king cos they have not hade real king in 200 years

The Amulet of Kings is gone, Martin destroyed it, and the Empire is crumbling, the King of Skyrim is not the emperor.

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:14 pm

only a dragonborn can equip the amulet and only a dragonborn can light the fires did you not think that could be part of the quest line restarting the fires to stop the dragons form takening over dude my theroy is still vaild

The Dragonfires sealed the barrier of Oblivion and the rest of the universe. It did nothing to stop the dragons. And again, the amulet is gone anyway.

Mankar Camaron didn't. And the amulet of kings is not important except for the Septim line. Nobody except the Septim line ever became emperor with the Amulet of Kings. And obviously they did, because they were in the royal bloodline!

The Amulet of Kings was formed when Akatosh and Alessia formed the Covenant. It's not even known if any Dragonborn can where it, usually the eldest becomes the emperor.

» Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:19 pm

What? The amulet was shattered to summon the avatar of Akatosh with the blood of the Alessian Covenant, Martin's blood. So no Amulet of Kings for you.

Also wouldn't that be INCREDIBLY CHEEZY? Save the world, and the grateful populace will name you King! Huzzah!

And if not King then Emperor? So you're an emperor forever confined to one province of your empire? Can't even visit your palace in the imperial city?