Will there be swords, knifes, daggers,etc...

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:08 pm

You, my friend, are thinking of the claymore, an easy mistake to make.

Well, you still use claymores with both hands, eh?

And everytime I think of Barbarians, I think of battleaxes and -hammers, sometimes maces. But during the medieval (booooring!) ages, the civilised (boooooring!) people probably would've used swords.
User avatar
Trent Theriot
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:37 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:08 pm

Well, you still use claymores with both hands, eh?

And everytime I think of Barbarians, I think of battleaxes and -hammers, sometimes maces. But during the medieval (booooring!) ages, the civilised (boooooring!) people probably would've used swords.

Legend claims that the zweihander was designed to have a group of men charge at another group of pikemen, slash off the tips of their pikes, then stab them. You can never go wrong with a strategy like that.
User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:28 pm

Legend claims that the zweihander was designed to have a group of men charge at another group of pikemen, slash off the tips of their pikes, then stab them. You can never go wrong with a strategy like that.


Unless they didn't have pikes. Confusion would then ensue. Aha!
User avatar
Sheila Esmailka
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:41 pm

If they don't have pikes, chop off the tips of their arms, then stab em!
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:41 pm

If they don't have pikes, chop off the tips of their arms, then stab em!


Unless they didn't have arms. Confusion would ensue. Aha!
User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:03 am

Unless they didn't have arms. Confusion would ensue. Aha!

ILL BITE YOUR LEGS OFF!
User avatar
Stu Clarke
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:45 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:19 pm

What're you gonna do, bleed on me?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eMkth8FWno&feature=related
User avatar
Shelby Huffman
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:06 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:25 pm

Until we start to hear about nifty cyberneticly increased reflexes in Brink which allow for incredibly bad ass bullet blocking abilities, I don't think there are any areas of the game where a melee weapon will be more useful than a shotgun.

Actually there will be a few melee weapons.
Go http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_aY7HZvFpQ&feature=channel for more information.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi8rrnecBaE&feature=related
User avatar
Fanny Rouyé
 
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:47 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:51 pm

Mongols for the win. Who needs a sword or axe when they can kill you from horseback from several hundred feet away.
User avatar
STEVI INQUE
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:14 pm

Considering the state of society and limited supplies that are apparently a reality for the Ark, it would make sense for there to be simpler weaponry that doesn't require a stockpile of ammo.
User avatar
Chris Guerin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 2:44 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:25 pm

Considering the state of society and limited supplies that are apparently a reality for the Ark, it would make sense for there to be simpler weaponry that doesn't require a stockpile of ammo.


But using that simpler weaponry would lead to their deaths, so the two factions learned not to run up to an armed soldier and attempt to smack him with a 2x4.
User avatar
Chloe Yarnall
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:26 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:21 pm

But using that simpler weaponry would lead to their deaths, so the two factions learned not to run up to an armed soldier and attempt to smack him with a 2x4.


I do admit the Heavy would look quite intimidating with a 2x4, yet since he couldn't catch a Skinny I suppose it wouldn't matter.
User avatar
A Boy called Marilyn
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:33 am

If there were true melee weapons, you'd always have those retards who switch to melee too soon, thinking they'd be able to cover the 30 meters to an enemy unseen. Then'd he'd be killed and have to respawn, taking away from the team's efforts.
User avatar
Stephanie Nieves
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:16 am

Agreed, I'm satisfied with the butt of my rifle/pistol being the only melee weapon available. I'm looking forward to the extra XP it awards when you finish off a downed enemy as well.
User avatar
Emma louise Wendelk
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:31 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:24 pm

If there were true melee weapons, you'd always have those retards who switch to melee too soon, thinking they'd be able to cover the 30 meters to an enemy unseen. Then'd he'd be killed and have to respawn, taking away from the team's efforts.



Your point being?

Agreed, I'm satisfied with the butt of my rifle/pistol being the only melee weapon available. I'm looking forward to the extra XP it awards when you finish off a downed enemy as well.


Except for the sweet knife.
User avatar
Dalton Greynolds
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:10 pm

My point being is that people would be running up to attempt an ineffective melee kill instead of using a gun and helping the team out as a whole. There's a reason guns have replaced swords. Guns work better.
User avatar
Vivien
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:47 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:10 pm

Okay, I have been wondering about this for a while now. Are the melee attacks going to be like the Halo melee attacks(underpowered) or CoD melee attacks(overpowered)? This kind of thing can change gameplay TONS. If anybody has an answer, please respond. Until then, I'll reread the Compendium to see if I missed anything. Thanks!
User avatar
Nichola Haynes
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:54 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:35 pm

Okay, I have been wondering about this for a while now. Are the melee attacks going to be like the Halo melee attacks(underpowered) or CoD melee attacks(overpowered)? This kind of thing can change gameplay TONS. If anybody has an answer, please respond. Until then, I'll reread the Compendium to see if I missed anything. Thanks!


I think I remember it being one melee attack to knock them down. Then you've knocked the person down, you decide whether to execute melee style or you shoot him while he's down. Someone else correct me if I'm wrong, too vague, or there's more details.
User avatar
louise hamilton
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:16 am

Post » Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:41 am

I think I remember it being one melee attack to knock them down. Then you've knocked the person down, you decide whether to execute melee style or you shoot him while he's down. Someone else correct me if I'm wrong, too vague, or there's more details.

Yes, I remember hearing that SD created a bit of a mindgame with the melee attacks. If you knock someone down, you can do a melee for an easy kill, but they are able to shoot at you while they're on the ground. So the basic idea is, if they are shooting, you shoot; if they try to get up, go for the melee kill.
User avatar
Brittany Abner
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:19 pm

Yes, I remember hearing that SD created a bit of a mindgame with the melee attacks. If you knock someone down, you can do a melee for an easy kill, but they are able to shoot at you while they're on the ground. So the basic idea is, if they are shooting, you shoot; if they try to get up, go for the melee kill.

Oh.. Okay, so kinda like final stand or last stand(whatever it is) on CoD?
User avatar
RUby DIaz
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:18 am

Post » Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:04 am

Yes, I remember hearing that SD created a bit of a mindgame with the melee attacks. If you knock someone down, you can do a melee for an easy kill, but they are able to shoot at you while they're on the ground. So the basic idea is, if they are shooting, you shoot; if they try to get up, go for the melee kill.


I believe the melee kill gives you a ton more points too. I think I found that in HORSE's latest blog...
User avatar
Ana
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:11 pm

Oh.. Okay, so kinda like final stand or last stand(whatever it is) on CoD?

Somewhat, the main difference would be that you aren't limited to just a pistol. And obviously that you can get up after you get rid of the guy trying to smash your skull in.
User avatar
nath
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:53 am

My point being is that people would be running up to attempt an ineffective melee kill instead of using a gun and helping the team out as a whole. There's a reason guns have replaced swords. Guns work better.



Well that's there fault for being idiots. Its like going around attempting to snipe or GL one man army. You can't stop them from doing what they will anyway so don't limit the rest of us.

Somewhat, the main difference would be that you aren't limited to just a pistol. And obviously that you can get up after you get rid of the guy trying to smash your skull in.


Last stand isn't the same is prone. Last standing is bleeding out so to speak and you need an ability to use even the pistol. Prone is well prone, get up or shoot.
User avatar
djimi
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:44 am

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:43 pm

Well that's there fault for being idiots. Its like going around attempting to snipe or GL one man army. You can't stop them from doing what they will anyway so don't limit the rest of us.



Last stand isn't the same is prone. Last standing is bleeding out so to speak and you need an ability to use even the pistol. Prone is well prone, get up or shoot.


I think he meant "get up" as in stand back up after being given a revive syringe by a medic.
User avatar
Lucky Boy
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:26 pm

Post » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:56 pm

But using that simpler weaponry would lead to their deaths, so the two factions learned not to run up to an armed soldier and attempt to smack him with a 2x4.


Knives kill people. 2 x 4s do not. You do realize this, yes?

Also, running up to armed soldiers when you've run out of gun ammo is a fool's errand. But hiding somewhere and letting him come to you while having the opportunity to at least defend yourself with a sharp weapon is far better than nothing.
User avatar
Caroline flitcroft
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:05 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games