Will You Feel Cheated?

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:46 pm

After watching the trailers for the ten millionth time, I began to think. What if Dragons are just creatures? I mean, we've been told they're handled as creatures, in the game engine, but I'm talking about the actual game lore.

What if Dragons have nothing to do with Akatosh, and have nothing to do with the Dragons we know?

I fear they're going to be drastically cheapened. My major beef with Dragons appearing as a standard creature is how Bethesda have mocked dragons in the past, with M'aiq. They've clearly stated how they're avoiding that cliché. While personally, I have no problem with clichés, I really wouldn't like to have Bethesda contradict thier own lore like this.

I vote yes.

Just a friendly piece of paranoia. :)

EDIT: This isn't speculating whether or not they're going to be so, just acculumating the thoughts of the forums on the matter of contradicting the lore.
User avatar
Latisha Fry
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:57 am

No? Why would I?
User avatar
Jack Walker
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:50 pm

Since the whole premise of the game is "you should have listened.... it's already too late... they're already here..." I think Bethesda intended for the dragons to play a significant role in the entire story, including randomly scaring the bejeebus out of you when you are adventuring and suddenly have no where to run and have to face a couple tons of angry, fire-shout capable badass dragon. And the fact that you are designated as "Dragonborn" seems kind of like a dead giveaway to the notion that dragons are somehow going to be important.

short version: not worried. :P
User avatar
John Moore
 
Posts: 3294
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:18 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:13 am

nope
User avatar
chloe hampson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:15 am

I didn't really expect them to be more than ancient mythical animals.

Even if they're more than that, I don't know what that would mean. All of them serve Alduin/Akatosh? They're demigods? Even if they are how that would change anything?
User avatar
herrade
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:09 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:45 am

Todd did say that dragons was something they "always wanted to do". It wouldn't have been the first time they contradicted their own lore, and probably not the last.


BUT then again after reading. There seems to be more of the Lore in this game, than in Oblivion. Dragon shouts we knew as Tongues, we also knew that according to Nord lore that Alduin would return to eat the world.

I don't feel cheated. It seems it was done pretty well by the lore.
User avatar
SHAWNNA-KAY
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:22 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:12 pm

I didn't really understand the question/OP so I voted no :thumbsup:
User avatar
Marilú
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:17 am

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:45 pm

They spent 2 years of development time on them.

I can't think they'll flop.
User avatar
tiffany Royal
 
Posts: 3340
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:32 am

It wouldn't have been the first time they contradicted their own lore, and probably not the last.

The problem is, the other major lore contradictions, such as the jungles of Cyrodiil, weren't exactly well recieved. Do we really want more of the debating?


BUT then again after reading. There seems to be more of the Lore in this game, than in Oblivion. Dragon shouts we knew as Tongues, we also knew that according to Nord lore that Alduin would return to eat the world.

I don't feel cheated. It seems it was done pretty well by the lore.

Akatosh, Alduin, same thing. My fear is that dragons will have nothing to do with him. We've had no indication that Dragons are nothing other than mere creatures. They would be done fine, however, if they're tied in with Akatosh somehow. Especially with Nordic Lore. I've never said otherwise. I'm asking how everyone would feel if this wasn't true. Seems something Bethesda should know.
User avatar
marina
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:22 am

They wouldn't contradict their lore at all.

After all there were dragons as normal creatures on Vvardenfell before the cliffracers drove them away, maybe they fled to Skyrim?

Anyway, I wouldn't feel cheated, and all in all dragons would still be something special in the TES lore, just not in the game Skyrim.
User avatar
JR Cash
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:59 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:24 am

After all there were dragons as normal creatures on Vvardenfell before the cliffracers drove them away, maybe they fled to Skyrim?


This post made me think... were the cliffracers more powerful than dragons? If so, what would be the next rank of awesomeness? Maybe saint Jiub, he`s the guy who killed all cliffracers in Morrowind.

And no, I wouldn`t feel cheated. I`m not that big of a fan of the whole dragon thing, anyway. I just want some cool magic tricks and some awesome gear.
User avatar
Lauren Dale
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:57 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:06 am

After watching the trailers for the ten millionth time, I began to think. What if Dragons are just creatures? I mean, we've been told they're handled as creatures, in the game engine, but I'm talking about the actual game lore.

What if Dragons have nothing to do with Akatosh, and have nothing to do with the Dragons we know?

I fear they're going to be drastically cheapened. My major beef with Dragons appearing as a standard creature is how Bethesda have mocked dragons in the past, with M'aiq. They've clearly stated how they're avoiding that cliché. While personally, I have no problem with clichés, I really wouldn't like to have Bethesda contradict thier own lore like this.

I vote yes.

Just a friendly piece of paranoia. :)

EDIT: This isn't speculating whether or not they're going to be so, just acculumating the thoughts of the forums on the matter of contradicting the lore.

I don't think you're taking into consideration the vast amount of work they've put into the dragons. Bethesda won't let them feel cheap, I can promise you.
User avatar
Kat Stewart
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:30 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:58 pm

nope
User avatar
Steve Smith
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:08 am

Akatosh, Alduin, same thing. My fear is that dragons will have nothing to do with him. We've had no indication that Dragons are nothing other than mere creatures. They would be done fine, however, if they're tied in with Akatosh somehow. Especially with Nordic Lore. I've never said otherwise. I'm asking how everyone would feel if this wasn't true. Seems something Bethesda should know.

Akatosh is not Alduin, why would Akatosh save the world from Mehrunes Dagon in Oblivion? So he could have a snack 200 years later?
I don't understand, how you can say the dragons are "mere creatures" They fly around wreaking Havoc on cities and towns. They have the ability to use Tongues/Dragon Shouts. They are here because of Alduins return(Another thing that separates Alduin and Akatosh, Alduins gone and is coming back). And when you kill them you absorb their souls, without soul trap or soul gems.

I know that the gameplay mechanics make them as random spawns, but thats for fun.
User avatar
Bellismydesi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:04 am

I really have little doubt that the dragons are tied to Akatosh/Alduin, everything seems to point to Alduin playing a major role in Skyrim's story, presumably as the main antagonist, and it also seems that dragons were gone from the world and are only now returning to cause havoc, it seems to me like it would be an unlikely coincidence if dragons returning just happened to proceed Alduin's efforts to eat the world. Though even if it turned out that our assumption that dragons are connected to Alduin is wrong, the truth could turn out to be just as interesting, if not more so. It seems to me that it's pretty clear that Bethesda is putting a lot of work into their dragons, I mean, they even created a full language for them, they never did that for Daedra or the Sixth House, I'd say Bethesda is probably trying hard to ensure that people aren't dissappointed in their dragons.

This post made me think... were the cliffracers more powerful than dragons? If so, what would be the next rank of awesomeness? Maybe saint Jiub, he`s the guy who killed all cliffracers in Morrowind.


Actually, it isn't said that Saint Jiub killed all the cliffracers, the rumors say he drove them from Vvardenfell, which says, at least to me, that he did not kill them, not all of them, he just forced them to migrate to some other place, where? I don't know, and it's certainly possible that they couldn't survive wherever they were driven to, but who knows, maybe they not only survived, but as a result of Jiub's driving them away from Vvardenfell, they were actually able to avoid the eruption of Red Mountain and thus survived where other native species died :lol:

Regardless, though, obviously, an individual cliffracer is not stronger than a dragon, but they wouldn't need to be, they're far more numerous, and perhaps what happened is that cliffracers and dragons are the same things, and since cliffracers were more numerous than dragons they ended up eating all the dragons' food, thus keeping them from surviving in Vvardenfell, that's how I'd guess cliffracers might end up driving dragons out, anyway.
User avatar
Emily Graham
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:34 am

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:36 pm

Easy enough to picture how Cliff Racers could drive a dragon away. Ever see gulls or crows mob a bird of prey? Dragons are predators and while individually a cliff racer would be food, a mob of them could injure a dragon suffiently as to prevent it from hunting.
User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:13 am

Uhhhm.... Nah
User avatar
Ellie English
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:47 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:42 am

While personally, I have no problem with clichés, I really wouldn't like to have Bethesda contradict thier own lore like this.

Umm, contradicting which lore exactly? I don't think I follow what you meant exactly there, OP, so I'll refrain from voting for now.
User avatar
Cody Banks
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:30 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:13 am

Do you guys remember http://www.gameinformer.com/p/skyrim_wall.aspx. It confirms Alduins return, Alduin is a dragon and the Return of dragons at Alduins return is more than just a coinkydink.

Edit: Off to work now, don't expect me to reply to anything for the next 10 hours.
User avatar
Kayla Keizer
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:31 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:55 am

They aren't going to be just normal creatures. I'm sure there's going to be some really cool encounters and secrets.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:36 pm

If I understand you correctly I would say yes, but I think that your issue is not an issue, what I mean is that the random encounters are not the only encounters with dragons, I think it says somewhere in an article that there will be story special encounters, or boss encounters if you will, so I think everything is ok, except of course...
User avatar
James Shaw
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:23 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:25 am

Todd has mentioned that, although the dragons are handled as "normal" creatures with regular spawn patterns and what-not, there are some dragons that are hand-placed to appear during the main quest. Oh, and they will also be talking. I think it's pretty safe to say they're well involved in the main story.
User avatar
Rach B
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:30 am

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:51 pm

What has their relationship with Akatosh got to do with them being epic or not? This thread is nonsensical. A dragon is defined by her size and scope, not her family tree.
User avatar
(G-yen)
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:03 pm

Akatosh is not Alduin, why would Akatosh save the world from Mehrunes Dagon in Oblivion? So he could have a snack 200 years later?
I don't understand, how you can say the dragons are "mere creatures" They fly around wreaking Havoc on cities and towns. They have the ability to use Tongues/Dragon Shouts. They are here because of Alduins return(Another thing that separates Alduin and Akatosh, Alduins gone and is coming back). And when you kill them you absorb their souls, without soul trap or soul gems.

I know that the gameplay mechanics make them as random spawns, but thats for fun.

Actually, look up your lore. Akatosh and Alduin are two names for the same god. The god of time, creation, and destruction. Every so often, he "devours" the world and creates another one to take its place.

Anyhow, as far as lore goes, dragons are just regular creatures (albeit very old and intelligent ones). They've existed throughout the world for ages, but they've been dormant for a very long time, and were thought by some to be extinct. Now they're coming back, and they're a little pissy about the whole "driving them to near extinction" thing. As to whether or not they have anything to do with Akatosh/Alduin; It's more than possible that he had a hand in their return, but nothing in lore suggests that dragons as a species are specifically tied to him for any reason. http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Dragons Dragons went into hiding because so many people/things were trying to kill them, and their numbers were dwindling. Now, apparently that irked them a little bit, and they're coming back with a bit of a vendetta. Anyhow, I'm sure that Bethesda will stay true to their lore, but you also have to remember that we really don't know all that much about dragons in TES since they've been dormant for so long.

Edit: grammar....tired...
User avatar
Mario Alcantar
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:26 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:48 am

Yes I would feel extremely cheated. If I see more than one unscripted dragon within an hour of play I'll feel cheated. They need some mystique.

Of course it's hard not to be disappointed at some point in the development of a franchise if you care about its lore at all.
User avatar
Da Missz
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:42 pm

Next

Return to V - Skyrim