Witch game would you advice getting?

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:40 pm

i'm thinking of buying a Fallout game... I think the series sound (from what I've heard) pretty good... witch game would you advice I get? New Vegas or 3?
User avatar
Matt Terry
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 10:58 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:49 am

Honestly, you should get the first game.
User avatar
Anna Beattie
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:48 am

I say you should get the first one... Always good starting at the beginning...

Or Fallout 3, if you can't find F1 or F2 it'll still give you a decent introduction to the series.
User avatar
Chloe Yarnall
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:26 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:59 pm

Not really, New Vegas strikes closer to the originals. In any case you can find Fallout 1, 2, and Tactics for about 20 bucks at Best Buy or even Gamestop.
User avatar
Felix Walde
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:50 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:47 am

GET THEM ALL. Serously you should i think there all good. ( didnt play F1,2, tatics but i have seen gameplay)
User avatar
Kayleigh Mcneil
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:32 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:55 pm

I'd start at the first, but if you can't stand dealing with the game mechanics then I recommend New Vegas.
User avatar
kyle pinchen
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:01 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:47 am

Buy the "Trilogy pack", which has Fallout 1, Fallout 2 and Fallout: Tactics (Fallout: Tactics is only considered partly canon though). You can get the pack http://store.steampowered.com/sub/2008/. It's a good start of the series and its lore, but some people might have a hard time with the 90's 2D sprite graphics and turn-based combat. It's awesome though. If you liked the story of Fallout 1 and 2, then I suggest you buy Fallout: New Vegas next, which is more like the sequel to these games than Fallout 3 is. Fallout 3 takes place in the Fallout universe, but on the other side of the country and has very little from the previous games. So basically, Fallout is split up into two categories - west-coast story (F1, F2, F:NV) and east-coast story (F3). Fallout: Tactics is in the midwest, but it's only semi-canon so...
User avatar
SWagg KId
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:26 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:07 pm

GET THEM ALL. Serously you should i think there all good. ( didnt play F1,2, tatics but i have seen gameplay)


SO you've played THE game?
User avatar
SiLa
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:52 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:18 am

I would advice buying Fallout, Fallout 2 and Tactics. They come in a pack. Then buy Fallout New Vegas, then Fallout 3.

If you don't want to play the older games first then buy New Vegas.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:04 pm

Fallout 3, I know there are a lot of hardcoe fallout lovers here, but Fallout 3 has graphics you're probably used to. If you want canon and back story get the first 2.
User avatar
Kaylee Campbell
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:17 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:50 pm

Fallout 3, I know there are a lot of hardcoe fallout lovers here, but Fallout 3 has graphics you're probably used to. If you want canon and back story get the first 2.


New Vegas has the same graphics as FO3. So you are saying if you want Canon/Fallout Lore and back story get the Originals and New Vegas. No real reason to get fallout 3 then eh?
User avatar
OTTO
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:58 am

No, I'de say for him to get FO1/2, Tactics.

If he wouldn't want that, I'de say he should get FO3 that way he'd appreciate NV more.
User avatar
Jeff Tingler
 
Posts: 3609
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:55 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:53 pm

New Vegas has the same graphics as FO3. So you are saying if you want Canon/Fallout Lore and back story get the Originals and New Vegas. No real reason to get fallout 3 then eh?

How about...Fallout 3 is just better :flamethrower:
User avatar
kasia
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:46 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:20 pm

How about...Fallout 3 is just better :flamethrower:


This.

Black Isle's Fallout Fans you shoulcn't mock or exclude F3 just because you didn't like it, it's a great game and way more fun, frightening, and climactic then Vegas could possibly ever be (even with DLCs).

Since this person is new to Fallout then I resommend Fallout 3 for them (changing my answer).

Fallout 3- 9.5

Fallout: New Vegas- 7.5

Since he's new to Fallout I think he'd prefer F3.
User avatar
Ash
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:59 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:05 pm

Since this person is new to Fallout then I resommend Fallout 3 for them (changing my answer).

Fallout 3- 9.5

Fallout: New Vegas- 7.5

Since he's new to Fallout I think he'd prefer F3.



Game rating are pointless. New Vegas only got a lower rating because Bethesda did not do enough QA testing and game ratings are given mostly on the newest graphics. New Vegas has the same graphics as fallout 3 so they are dated and "that's bad." New Vegas also won RPG game of the year as well as a writing award. I know FO3 won game of the year my point is so did New Vegas

If all you care about is shooting bullet sponges. Don't really care about not being able to join or even talk to many of the factions and being forced to help Good people and over all poor writing. Then FO3 is your game.

If you want a great story, joinable factions, moral grey, consequences for your actions and a more advlt feel New Vegas is your game. If you have researched fallout lore then New Vegas gives alot of it.
User avatar
Kayleigh Mcneil
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:32 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:42 pm

the only Fallout games i've played are F03 and FNV and i don't feel left out and if you were to choose between F03 and FNV i would say it doesn't really matter because they are 2 different games and the stories between these game r different as well. The only thing they have in common is the same engine they made the game on and a couple of guns
User avatar
Minako
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:33 pm

the only Fallout games i've played are F03 and FNV and i don't feel left out and if you were to choose between F03 and FNV i would say it doesn't really matter because they are 2 different games and the stories between these game r different as well. The only thing they have in common is the same engine they made the game on and a couple of guns



Yep they are two different games. New Vegas is a Fallout game and FO3 is a fallout like game.
User avatar
Steve Fallon
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:29 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 1:26 pm

Fallout 1 first,

Fallout 3 continues something different

Is plainly shooter and less RPG. like Mass Effect 2


Game rating are pointless. New Vegas only got a lower rating because Bethesda did not do enough QA testing and game ratings are given mostly on the newest graphics. New Vegas has the same graphics as fallout 3 so they are dated and "that's bad." New Vegas also won RPG game of the year as well as a writing award. I know FO3 won game of the year my point is so did New Vegas

If all you care about is shooting bullet sponges. Don't really care about not being able to join or even talk to many of the factions and being forced to help Good people and over all poor writing. Then FO3 is your game.

If you want a great story, joinable factions, moral grey, consequences for your actions and a more advlt feel New Vegas is your game. If you have researched fallout lore then New Vegas gives alot of it.


Caesar Legion Support this
User avatar
Nomee
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:18 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:53 am

Game rating are pointless. New Vegas only got a lower rating because Bethesda did not do enough QA testing and game ratings are given mostly on the newest graphics. New Vegas has the same graphics as fallout 3 so they are dated and "that's bad." New Vegas also won RPG game of the year as well as a writing award. I know FO3 won game of the year my point is so did New Vegas

If all you care about is shooting bullet sponges. Don't really care about not being able to join or even talk to many of the factions and being forced to help Good people and over all poor writing. Then FO3 is your game.

If you want a great story, joinable factions, moral grey, consequences for your actions and a more advlt feel New Vegas is your game. If you have researched fallout lore then New Vegas gives alot of it.


If you want non stop boring ass politics go to Vegas,

If you want a real post apocalyptic feel or just general fun playing a game play Fallout 3.

We could just go like this forever, it's his choice, let him decide.
User avatar
Anne marie
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:05 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:14 am

I agree it is up to the OP to decide.

OP if you want a game with great post apocalyptic feel get Fallout One.

The post apocalyptic feel of FO3 is also part of the bad writing and why FO3 is a fallout like game IMO. Sure it looks great but when you think about it. Its been 200 years since the Great War. Things would have improved, people don't sit around doing nothing for 200 years. They rebuild. The world of FO3 makes no sense. The story is also just FO1 and FO2's story smashed together and rehashed again going back to the bad writing..
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:46 am

I understand how Fallout 3 looks like way to little time has past since the Great War but you don't really think of that when you're looking over the dusty landscape right before dusk, or when you (or atleast I) first get sight of D.C. itself.
User avatar
meg knight
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:20 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:29 am

I understand how Fallout 3 looks like way to little time has past since the Great War but you don't really think of that when you're looking over the dusty landscape right before dusk, or when you (or atleast I) first get sight of D.C. itself.

"seeing the sights" is no excuse for being railroaded to help the knights of the round tabl-- Brotherhood of Sissi-- Steel defeat the EVIL BAD GOVERNMENT! and SAVING WASTELAND!!!!!!!
User avatar
Stephy Beck
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:33 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:28 am

I understand how Fallout 3 looks like way to little time has past since the Great War but you don't really think of that when you're looking over the dusty landscape right before dusk, or when you (or atleast I) first get sight of D.C. itself.


That's just it. It tries to be "post-apocalyptic" when it doesn't fit. When something doesn't add up, I don't get any form of"immersion".
User avatar
No Name
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:30 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:41 pm

I understand how Fallout 3 looks like way to little time has past since the Great War but you don't really think of that when you're looking over the dusty landscape right before dusk, or when you (or atleast I) first get sight of D.C. itself.


Its not just how it looks. There is no real economy to the game. For some reason they are using caps. Caps were used in FO1 over 3000 miles away and by FO2 people started using gold coins. Fallout and Fallout 2 explain what backs the currancy. Water merchants in Fallout and NCR in FO2. New Vegas the cap is on top because of the ncr brotherhood war. FO3 is here are caps have fun. There is no real trade, companies just lone junk salesmen. No farming so how are people feeding themselves? 200 year old food? Even by Fallout 84 years after the great war things were more improved then FO3, 200 years after the great war.

Bad writing also goes into how almost everything is Good vs Evil in FO3. We are forced to work with the BoS yet can't help the Enclave. Well we can help them but for some reason they still keep attacking you :thumbsup:

A-bomb in the middle of a town with a man asking every new comer to blow it up and yet no one stops him? Best part is you blow it up and the people down the road treat you as just another wastelander :rolleyes:

Then Optimus Prime that does all the work for you in the final battle, I can go on.

That's just it. It tries to be "post-apocalyptic" when it doesn't fit. When something doesn't add up, I don't get any form of"immersion".


This :foodndrink:
User avatar
CORY
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:35 pm

I'd start at the first, but if you can't stand dealing with the game mechanics then I recommend New Vegas.


Fallout 3 and New Vegas are pretty different, so choose carefully. I prefer fallout 3.
User avatar
Louise Andrew
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:01 am

Next

Return to Fallout Series Discussion