World-Eating 101

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:57 pm

Maybe the gods have lost their free will because they have seen way too many kalpas to believe in it. And if you don't believe in free will, you don't have it.
User avatar
Samantha hulme
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:28 am

Maybe the gods have lost their free will because they have seen way too many kalpas to believe in it. And if you don't believe in free will, you don't have it.



They are denied free will, because they exist eternally, and recursively.

Mortals can have free will, because they are transient.
User avatar
TWITTER.COM
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:40 pm

Or what if Lorkhan did not fail a Chim? To dwell in the tower is to be a whole world of you, and metaphysics 101 tells us that AE, that the being before Anu and Padomay cannot last. By its very nature it splits. It always seemed to me that to attain Chim is to divide like God and become an Enatiomorph in yourself, with a new set of kalpas spurting out of your chest cavity. Do it again.


So we're all Lorkhan? Sweet; I find that kinky and incistuous.

I actually like rationalizing this idea of kalpas and endless rebirths from a purely metaphysical perspective. Forget, for a moment, the idea of the individual as a "body" -- a physical, corporeal being -- and instead reject physicality as an illusion (like Plato, I guess) and insist that the individual is an idea, a concept, a single self-defining meme or, to quote the Tsaesci, a Name. Perhaps the end of each kalpa is simultaneously a cataclysm and a miracle, brought about by a single individual (remembering that this means a single idea) that so imposes its existence upon everything else that it becomes existence itself through CHIM.

Imagine, if you would, a world where the presence of the metaphysical concept of Adventurous Putty is as fundamental and easily taken for granted as the presence of time or destruction in our own. Perhaps the gods, with their many interwoven names and characteristics, are the mingled thought-concepts of a previous existence that so stubbornly made the case for their existence that they thought, and by thinking, one by one, they were, ushering in a new existence. And perhaps that new existence itself was the thought of Lorkhan, who so thoroughly integrated himself that he became the new idea of becoming, is the idea of being at all.

But that was a shot in the dark.
User avatar
Scott
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:59 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:12 am

And now, in the high-brow, constructive, and totally insightful philosophy that "CHIM is the construction set, lol": each kalpa is a game in the series. Each time the universe is destroyed and remade anew, picking up some time after where it was left, but different.


:P
User avatar
hannah sillery
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:13 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:14 pm

So we're all Lorkhan? Sweet; I find that kinky and incistuous.

...snip... Perhaps the end of each kalpa is simultaneously a cataclysm and a miracle, brought about by a single individual (remembering that this means a single idea) that so imposes its existence upon everything else that it becomes existence itself through CHIM. ...snip...


Sounds like the Essential Hero is required once again - so next time the Hero has to destroy the world?

...snip... Imagine, if you would, a world where the presence of the metaphysical concept of Adventurous Putty is as fundamental and easily taken for granted as the presence of time or destruction in our own.
Adventurous Putty everywhere? The continuum held together by Putty? I'm trying to imagine it :facepalm: not easy - a bit of an extreme example that.
User avatar
Jodie Bardgett
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:38 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:22 am

What if I am the Godhead?

*gasp*

Oh shi -- [NUMINIT]
User avatar
willow
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:29 pm

What if I am the Godhead?

*gasp*

Oh shi -- [NUMINIT]


:nuke: Ohh noes DEVS - alert - Putty in Meltdown - SOP (save our putty) :violin:
User avatar
Matthew Warren
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:37 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:24 am

this is what she said last night:

It repeats itself because it must. Free will is the next subgradient. To love it is to kill it.
User avatar
Sista Sila
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:25 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:18 am

Is it possible that the one thing that is different in every kalpa is the addition of a new spoke on the wheel? In the previous kalpa, there were Eight, and in this kalpa, there are Nine?

I can't sleep, and had this idea as I laid there, trying to get to sleep.
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:43 am

I don't recall seeing anything about Dragon Breaks making new spokes.

I also don't recall hearing Talos being another spoke. From anywhere. He just mantled Lorkhan.
User avatar
Alkira rose Nankivell
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:56 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:09 pm

Dude, you totally lost me. I'm confusticated now. :(

I like what Lady Nerevar was saying, though, about a dawn that is not a dawn being dusk instead.
User avatar
Taylah Illies
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:13 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:30 am

Is it possible that the one thing that is different in every kalpa is the addition of a new spoke on the wheel? In the previous kalpa, there were Eight, and in this kalpa, there are Nine?

I can't sleep, and had this idea as I laid there, trying to get to sleep.


I think you have landed on one of those things that has no Lore either way. So there might be one less Spoke too.

Just as Gods may be mantled so it does appear that the Towers and the Spokes correspond - but I've not come accross anything that might suggest that creating a New Tower also creates a New Spoke for example - rather Towers seem to have been created to match existing Towers. If this is incorrect you might ask if a Tower 'loses' it's heart does it cease to be a Tower and therefore does the corresponding spoke cease to be a spoke?

But whether there is a shape or progression associated with the many Kalpas is an interesting topic. Now that I look closer at your question I wonder if you are asking if Kalpas and Spokes correspond too?

Speculation based on your suggestion would then be: If you assume that Time is the Hub then each Kalpa might be a Spoke and all contained within the Mundus suffounded by the Aurbis. To see it this way may be to accept that the Wheel is multi-aspected and that there is a progression.

Then you would have to ask if growth within the Wheel is possible - considering that 'all time' is considered to be bound within the Wheell, thereby binding all within the Wheel to it.

If internal growth exists then that might be represented by the appearence of a New Spoke/Kalpa and thus although the Wheel is circular there is also change and growth.

No idea if that is a new way of looking at it so that should be enough to give the buffs something to refute or otherwise play with.


What then interests me is: what external force is the hub of the wheel powering or being powered by?

And you also have a 3 tiered progression: Tower ... Spoke ... Kalpa

An alternate structure would be if Kalpas are the Spaces Between the Spokes. And if not, what do the Spaces represent or correspond to?
User avatar
Bereket Fekadu
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:31 am

I think of one consequence: the Empire of Tamriel is Aldmeris?
User avatar
matt white
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:43 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:17 pm


I can't say whether or not it's right or wrong, but it sounds very nifty in the least...
Is it possible that the one thing that is different in every kalpa is the addition of a new spoke on the wheel? In the previous kalpa, there were Eight, and in this kalpa, there are Nine?

But there are not nine spokes in 'this Kalpa', there are eight...

You're asking/theorizing what the spaces, spokes, and hub are, but we already know from http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/vehk_teaching.shtml#3. Time is not the hub, we (Mundus) are the hub; the Spaces correspond to the Daedric Princes, the spokes correspond to the Aedra.
User avatar
emily grieve
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:55 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:50 pm

I can't say whether or not it's right or wrong, but it sounds very nifty in the least...

But there are not nine spokes in 'this Kalpa', there are eight...

You're asking/theorizing what the spaces, spokes, and hub are, but we already know from http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/vehk_teaching.shtml#3. Time is not the hub, we (Mundus) are the hub; the Spaces correspond to the Daedric Princes, the spokes correspond to the Aedra.


If Vekh has achieved Chim has he left the Mundus? He has transcended, right?

And if he has left what new power takes his place?

And with a new power can there be a new order and arrangement of the structure of things?

edit:
World-Eating 101, Want to give birth to your own parents?
What will eat the world?
User avatar
lauren cleaves
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:35 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:04 pm

If Vekh has achieved Chim has he left the Mundus? He has transcended, right?

And if he has left what new power takes his place?

And with a new power can there be a new order and arrangement of the structure of things?


I highly...highly doubt it, seeing as we haven't seen anything to suggest this.

Unless you have some sort of support.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:33 am

I highly...highly doubt it, seeing as we haven't seen anything to suggest this.

Unless you have some sort of support.


I'm trying to make sense of the title of this thread
World-Eating 101, Want to give birth to your own parents?

MK calls it World eating 101 - so I ask: What will eat the world?

I feel there has to be something new here ... new = either a diferent perspective or something added or taken away - and SkyShadowing came up with something new. Question then is does it fit? So far no one has been able to say yes or no to that so I have tried to extend it towards known territory, but I keep getting drawn back to that thread title - as in what eats the world? Well maybe time - but what else?
User avatar
Ashley Tamen
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:17 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:50 pm

I'm trying to make sense of the title of this thread

MK calls it World eating 101 - so I ask: What will eat the world?

I feel there has to be something new here ... new = either a diferent perspective or something added or taken away - and SkyShadowing came up with something new. Question then is does it fit? So far no one has been able to say yes or no to that so I have tried to extend it towards known territory, but I keep getting drawn back to that thread title - as in what eats the world? Well maybe time - but what else?

Alduin eats the world, making room for the next one. The elves "erase man from the mythic," reconstruct the pure Aurbis, Akatosh rejoins Lorkhan as they are eaten up by the higher level of subgradient.
User avatar
Cat Haines
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:44 pm

If Vekh has achieved Chim has he left the Mundus?

No
MK calls it World eating 101 - so I ask: What will eat the world?

http://www.imperial-library.info/obscure_text/aldudagga.shtml, it is in his name...
Well maybe time - but what else?

Why does there have to be something else? But, if you're going to go along that line of thought it probably wouldn't be what else, but who else... I guess somebody new could take Alduin's place and eat the world...

Of course, this may just be my over-anolytical side showing through, but MK said "I won't tell you what I mean by 'new'" - just by making this statement he gives us reason to assume we shouldn't use the traditional definition of 'new' (as in, something new is added)...

Edit: Clarification
User avatar
Lily
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:32 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:42 pm

For minor clarification, Alduin seems more like a combo of Anu and Padhome more than Aka, even though there are obvious elements that Alduin shares with Aka.
User avatar
Kelvin Diaz
 
Posts: 3214
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:16 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:47 pm

Try Satakal, litterally Satak and Akal. :)
User avatar
Ellie English
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:47 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:48 pm

so next time the Hero has to destroy the world?

:o

I would LOVE that! No more of this 'saving the world' crap for me! I'm gonna eat it! :liplick:

Didn't the tscae (sp?) have this whole world eating thing going on with snakes and logic and numbers and stuff?
User avatar
Claire
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:01 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:01 pm

Alduin eats the world, making room for the next one. The elves "erase man from the mythic," reconstruct the pure Aurbis, Akatosh rejoins Lorkhan as they are eaten up by the higher level of subgradient.

That sounds like a certain Time Travelling Composite Being in the making - referrin to wassisname who came from the future - only I would imagine that he would have been a composite of myrriad smaller creatures and not just a couple of biggies.

About Alduin - now that he knows what Dagon and the Greedy Man have been up to can he undo their work? He curses Dagon to undo it, but maybe Dagon cannot ... so what happens if Alduin is unable to eat all and explodes???

The elves "erase man from the mythic," reconstruct the pure Aurbis


If Alduin or Dagon undoes Dagon's and the Greedy Man's stuff then what happens? The mer apparently believe they will be able to restore the Aurbis - but what happens if something has changed and they cannot?

As I said earlier, new = either a different perspective or something added or taken away - what could be added or taken away from this process that is indicated by what we have experienced and read in-game and out ... or could seeing it from a different perspective in itself be enough to change events?

oops, just realised:
Want to give birth to your own parents?
NO, I do not want to be my grandad or grandma and conceive my mum and dad. Grandpa and Grandma were very much in love and would not need my assistance ty
User avatar
CxvIII
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:35 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:42 am

Try Satakal, litterally Satak and Akal. :)


True dat. Think "Varieties of Faith" makes that exact assertion, so I just wanted to be kinda original.
User avatar
Penny Courture
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:59 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:12 pm

TESV = the breaking of the cycle.

Talos mantles/becomes Lorkhan.
His descendent (Uriel VII) destroyes Lorkhan's heart (through Nerevarine).
Ureil's descendent (Martin) becomes Akatosh.
Lorkhan is Akatosh is Lorkhan.

The Serpent dies. Tamriel lives.
User avatar
Logan Greenwood
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:41 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion