World's History vs. World's Geography

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 2:57 am

Both are quite important, but nonetheless it's a creative and healthy question to ponder. When creating or regarding a certain culture for/of a [fictional] world, which do you focus on more: the history of the culture, or the circumjacent geography? Which plays a larger role, if you will, of developing that culture? Which interests you more personally? Discuss.
User avatar
Alex [AK]
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:01 pm

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 12:32 am

I thought you were going to talk about Earth. :(

Anyways for a story I think the geography is probably more important, but history should be discluded. In the overall scheme of things though I think history is more important.
User avatar
TWITTER.COM
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 10:45 am

Geography will define the history 100% of the time.
User avatar
Johnny
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 12:33 pm

Getting so academic and obscure :)

There is a saying, maybe by the Greek geographer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strabo, "Geography is destiny". It's an important topic in history, obviously.

Myself, I'm mostly interested in history of ideas.

User avatar
stevie trent
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 11:18 am

Geography is a powerful shaper of history. If you want to create a coherent world, you shouldn't ignore it. I love maps, so I'm always happy when the author takes time to include one and describe the geographical setting. In complex stories though, I think the social side is more important to me.

User avatar
Lyd
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:56 pm

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 5:40 am

The Wheel of Time map annoyed me a bit because the rivers run strangely. Most of them go to capes for some odd reason. And they run really straight where they should meander.

One world that has some interesting interplay between geography and history is Glorantha. It has a really detailed history, maybe the most for a fantasy game. I mean Forgotten Realms has lots of novels and stuff, but Glorantha has a whole 300 page book just about its history (King of Sartar), and loads of magazine articles too.

User avatar
CORY
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 4:15 pm

It wasn't as bad as Eragon. That map made no sense. But you are right that it was a little weird.

User avatar
Carlos Rojas
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:19 am

Post » Sun May 04, 2014 11:01 am

They both hang together. I'm very enthusiastic about history but I enjoy geography as well, and I can see how the latter helps shape the former. If you're writing a fantasy novel and you don't pay attention to the geography and geopolitics then writing a coherent and believable history becomes difficult.

To answer your question, though. History is more important when it comes to developing a culture, but not paying attention to geography will diminish your history writing capabilities by a lot. Again, I'm thinking fantasy novels here, with a well-established world.

User avatar
Silvia Gil
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:31 pm


Return to Othor Games