@Gabriel77dan
1. He doesn't allow them to use medicine so that their bodies will stay strong on their own.
--Then why does he have the autodoc? He is a hypocrite who uses technology to control people.
2. What?
--Taken out of context. Agricultural science did not bring about the atomic war.
3. I thought he explained that he only allows for the people to use what they themselves can create and to not rely on old world technology cause one day it will fail and it's better to restart anew and grow strong with the knowledge at hand.
---Then why are they using firearms/ballistic fists/etc. that they can't create themselves? Hypocracy.
4. I see no atomic warheads in Caesa'rs camp.
---Taken out of context. I was referring to the weapons technology that led to the atomic war. Medicine and agricultural science did not.
5. Isn't it a necessity for the one in charge to be able to control his/her/their people?
---Again taken out of context. He is a hypocrite. If technology is bad, then it is all bad.
6. Wrong.
7. Wrong.
----Do you really believe that if a slave refused to accept the sixual advances of a legionare, or looked at him in an offensive manner, or talked back that the legionare wouldn't kill or at the least beat the slave? Lanius killed a brahmin because it was in his way. Slaves are no better than brahmin, probably worth less. Brahmin can carry more and are less troublesome.
8. So is BOS and NCR.
----Never said they weren't. This has nothing to do with the subject at hand. This is deflection.
9. The reason I'm annoyed at these threads: Legion got shafted in FNV...
----As portrayed in New Vegas, Caesar's Legion is not best for the Mojave. Maybe FO4 will give the truth about them, but I doubt it. I think the devs get off on these arguments.
10. I don't trust the GECK's "karma" crap really, I like to make my own opinions about people, I'm sure Master would be considered evil in the GECK if FO1 had one but I still consider him a man with a noble vision.
-----Doesn't work for something you didn't make. Only the author can say that this person is bad, this one is good. And just because someone has a noble vision doesn't mean they are not evil. "You will do what I say or I will kill you." is not good; even if the end result is in their best interest. Caesar's Legion as a whole, in New Vegas, is evil.
1. I figure it's so that he have something "magical", a miraculous gift which he can grant someone if they do great work. A way to reward a good dog.
2. Kay.
3. Who says they cannot craft these weapons themselves?
4. Mkay so modern weapons overall?
5. When does he say that tech is bad? He says that his people should use what they are able to understand and create themselves, and disallow medicine so that his people will learn how to stay strong without the need for medicine to extend lifetime.
67. You never said that it had to be a slave. Yes, if a slave looked at a legionnaire the wrong way they could earn themselves a good beating, but it would be unnecessary to kill a slave for that unless it's a purpose of striking more fear into the others.
9. For Vegas, no, for the entire wasteland? Yes, IMO.
10. Erm, no? The reader of a book is allowed to their own interpretation, the author has no right to say "you're wrong." The world isn't built up of black and white morality but tons of variables in a gray area.
I consider Legion to be lawful evil though, but the GECK can [censored] off IMO.