Would you buy Skyrim if...

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:11 am

no, it wont :rofl:


Yes, it will. :rofl: :rofl:




I'm aware of those. Those aren't actual mods, just a few things to mess with the game's files (to very limited degree) and some content mods that aren't really anything too serious. It's a far cry from 25,000+, but rather more like a handful.


It's still user-generated content.
User avatar
sally coker
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:29 pm

Buy Skyrim at a local store. Don't see why you have to get it on Steam.


No you misunderstood me. I am talking about Steam requirement even for the physical version like Fallout New Vegas.
User avatar
Sarah Knight
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:02 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:07 pm

No you misunderstood me. I am talking about Steam requirement even for the physical version like Fallout New Vegas.


Oh...I doubt it. Would be stupid if so. And can't you just make a Steam account? Or do you have to pay like monthly for one?
User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:49 pm

the only thing mods are good for is fixing glitches
User avatar
Jarrett Willis
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:48 am

the only thing mods are good for is fixing glitches


So http://www.lostspires.com/ must be pure junk, right? :facepalm:
User avatar
Nick Jase Mason
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:23 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:18 am

Yes, it will. :rofl: :rofl:






It's still user-generated content.

You're both wrong. It may be better on a PC. The fact of the matter is that the PC version will most likely range from below console settings to above in options. One's PC will determine what one's experience will be like.
User avatar
Avril Churchill
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:00 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:32 pm

No you misunderstood me. I am talking about Steam requirement even for the physical version like Fallout New Vegas.

Yea, I thought NV required it. It seems that's the path Beth is going down, so Skyrim will probably require it.
User avatar
Chase McAbee
 
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:59 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:25 am

the only thing mods are good for is fixing glitches


And adding:

Better Graphics (higher res textures, open cities, etc)
Quests
Dungeson/Ruins/Forts/etc
NPCs

And more.
User avatar
Sammykins
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:50 am

You're both wrong. It may be better on a PC. The fact of the matter is that the PC version will most likely range from below console settings to above in options. One's PC will determine what one's experience will be like.


That's true. If you have a really crappy PC, you're best playing it on the console (if you have one already). Or, if you don't already have a console, buying a better PC might be an option.
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:01 pm

I'm not 100% sure what Steam is. But I've read many things about it, and I concluded it was a site where you could pay for a game and you download it right on the spot. So, from what you're saying there and my knowledge on Steam, no. I don't see why you should need to use Steam.



Steam can also be used as a DRM service, like with New Vegas. So you will have to run the steam client to play New Vegas no matter how you obtained a copy of the game.
User avatar
Anna Krzyzanowska
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:08 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:31 pm

Yes, it will. :rofl: :rofl:






It's still user-generated content.

no it really wont it will be the same on all systems with minor graphic changes but graphics don't make a game awesome :banana:
User avatar
Michelle Chau
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:24 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:55 pm

Oh...I doubt it. Would be stupid if so. And can't you just make a Steam account? Or do you have to pay like monthly for one?


It's a matter of principle. What is the point of buying a physical copy if i am just forced onto a Digital distribution service anyway?
User avatar
Makenna Nomad
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:05 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:06 pm

no it really wont it will be the same on all systems with minor graphic changes but graphics don't make a game awesome :banana:

If you play it on my PC, it won't look or run too well. If you play it on Shasow's PC, I'll bet it will have higher resolutions, the coveted AA, and a better framerate.
User avatar
kasia
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:46 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:57 am

I have been playing TES games for nearly a decade now, and for nearly a decade I have never given a single [censored] about mods, to hell with 'em!
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:24 am

Ya. I play on console. Even so, it still will have hundreds of hours of gameplay. Way more then most games that come out at the same price.
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:39 pm

If you play it on my PC, it won't look or run too well. If you play it on Shasow's PC, I'll bet it will have higher resolutions, the coveted AA, and a better framerate.


Nope. My PC isn't too great. I play Oblivion with low textures and default everything else. It works good with medium (default) textures...but I downloaded this house mod that lowered my FPS a whole bunch...so I lowered my texture detail. I uninstalled the mod because of the FPS drops, but I kept low textures because I didn't notice a single difference.
User avatar
Kill Bill
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:22 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:16 pm

Nope. My PC isn't too great. I play Oblivion with low textures and default everything else. It works good with medium (default) textures...but I downloaded this house mod that lowered my FPS a whole bunch...so I lowered my texture detail. I uninstalled the mod because of the FPS drops, but I kept low textures because I didn't notice a single difference.

Why didn't you lie?! I was trying to make a point and now you've cost me my wager! :P
User avatar
Code Affinity
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:11 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:49 pm

Why the pc elitism? They are the same game... Pc just has the option of adding more usless stuff...
User avatar
Felix Walde
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:50 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:31 am

Why didn't you lie?! I was trying to make a point and now you've cost me my wager! :P


My graphics are still better than on consoles. :banana: :banana:

Controls much more easy too. And I can play anything on the go (laptop)! And the whole room doesn't see my playing my games.
User avatar
jodie
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:42 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:36 am

Oh...I doubt it. Would be stupid if so. And can't you just make a Steam account? Or do you have to pay like monthly for one?

you don't have to pay a monthly fee to steam, but you will be paying a monthly internet bill. which for me (if I was the one paying the bills) would be 75$ a month. you can play offline, but you have to be able to log in online to select offline to begin with so if you don't have internet and steam is required your screwed. nothing imo is wrong with steam other than not getting to have a physical copy for when steam no longer exists but games should not be exclusivly available through a single service

Yea, I thought NV required it. It seems that's the path Beth is going down, so Skyrim will probably require it.


NV did require it. now what we don't know if it was BGS idea to provide it exclusivly through steam or Obsidian, but I don't know why OBS. would have a say in that matter since they made the game not published it. SK might be steam exclusive, but I think it might actually be available other ways since there was a backlash of sorts among a good number of people.
User avatar
RaeAnne
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 6:40 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:59 pm

Why didn't you lie?! I was trying to make a point and now you've cost me my wager! :P


you have been beaten :mage:
User avatar
Nathan Barker
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:53 pm

NV did require it. now what we don't know if it was BGS idea to provide it exclusivly through steam or Obsidian, but I don't know why OBS. would have a say in that matter since they made the game not published it. SK might be steam exclusive, but I think it might actually be available other ways since there was a backlash of sorts among a good number of people.


I have no doubt that this Steam requirement will lower the sales of Skyrim. I'd be enraged! :swear:
User avatar
c.o.s.m.o
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:11 pm

NV did require it. now what we don't know if it was BGS idea to provide it exclusivly through steam or Obsidian, but I don't know why OBS. would have a say in that matter since they made the game not published it. SK might be steam exclusive, but I think it might actually be available other ways since there was a backlash of sorts among a good number of people.

Ok cool. Thanks for the clarification.
User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:27 am

My graphics are still better than on consoles. :banana: :banana:

Controls much more easy too. And I can play anything on the go (laptop)! And the whole room doesn't see my playing my games.

Honestly, I don't think so. Default everything with low textures must be the same as the 360 version, but with the lower resolution textures you mentioned and maybe a slightly higher framerate to compensate for to the lower textures. It probably also has faster load times Then, the PS3 version, which was noted to look and perform better than the 360 version after undergoing one year of extra optimization, is probably a bit superior to your version in the graphics department, so... :P
User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:36 am

Honestly, I don't think so. Default everything with low textures must be the same as the 360 version, but with the lower resolution textures you mentioned and maybe a slightly higher framerate to compensate for to the lower textures. It probably also has faster load times Then, the PS3 version, which was noted to look and perform better than the 360 version after undergoing one year of extra optimization, is probably a bit superior to your version in the graphics department, so... :P


Except my PSN account doesn't get hacked on the PC.
User avatar
Ownie Zuliana
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:31 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim