Would you pay more for the next TES?

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:57 am

Sharing isn't illegal.

Doing it en masse over a torrent network or for profit is.


Again I disagree, now, you won't be prosecuted, but when you buy a game, you aren't buying a disc to share and use, you are buying the right for yourself to use a program, if you let someone else use your program it might not be for your profit, but its for the loss of the company, ie you took 60 bucks out of their wallet

but like I said no one is going to prosecute anyone on those grounds, and there is a gray area as there isn't really a legal precedent (besides torrent sharing precedents)

@ spear-there is a no option, whats the difference if I divide the yes options for better clarity, perhaps I shouldn't have tacked the New zealand thing on or put a pay less option? but pay less isn't what I was asking, so you can say "60 is enough"
User avatar
Eddie Howe
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:06 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:40 am

Again I disagree, now, you won't be prosecuted, but when you buy a game, you aren't buying a disc to share and use, you are buying the right for yourself to use a program, if you let someone else use your program it might not be for your profit, but its for the loss of the company, ie you took 60 bucks out of their wallet

but like I said no one is going to prosecute anyone on those grounds, and there is a gray area as there isn't really a legal precedent (besides torrent sharing precedents)


There is no gray area. No one has ever been prosecuted for lending a game to someone.
User avatar
Undisclosed Desires
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:10 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:28 am

How about hell no! Games are already too expensive.
User avatar
Stephanie I
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:28 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:30 pm

I'm sorry. But seriously.

What the bloody hell is the big deal about Spellmaking? It added nothing to the game but stronger. and usually overpowered spells.
User avatar
Jamie Moysey
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:51 am

There is no gray area. No one has ever been prosecuted for lending a game to someone.


just because there isn't a precedent from the courts doesn't mean its not illegal, it defers to software laws on such grounds

likewise a precedent isn't a law
User avatar
Jonathan Windmon
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:33 pm

How do you figure?

Because they are. There price also drops realy fast as they get old. They are too expensive.
User avatar
biiibi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:39 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:50 pm

Because they are. There price also drops realy fast as they get old. They are too expensive.

That did not help at all.
User avatar
Kristina Campbell
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:56 pm

That did not help at all.

5 brand new games should not cost 300$.
User avatar
elliot mudd
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:56 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:47 am

While for Skyrim specifically, I wouldn't mind. Considering it will give me HUNDREDS of hours of great fun, as well as thousands of hours I will spend modding it.

However, this is the issue I see. If BGS charges $70 for their next game, other companies will see it as an example and do the same. Then they will effectively raise the base price of ALL games for $70. If TES:VI was more, and ONLY that one game was more, I would pay the extra money without blinking. But it's the chain reaction of raised prices I would be scared of.
User avatar
SUck MYdIck
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:43 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:46 pm

I'm sorry. But seriously.

What the bloody hell is the big deal about Spellmaking? It added nothing to the game but stronger. and usually overpowered spells.

How about a crap load of customization for mages.
User avatar
Tracy Byworth
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:09 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:01 am

No, games are too expensive now as it is.

This is so much BS. It really irks me when people say this sort of thing. Video Games are so cheap these days its not funny.

Boo Hoo, they raised the standard video game retail price from $50 to $60 with the current generation, so freaking what?! Prior to the PSX/N64 generation, there was no $50 standard, in fact, games cost in excess of $70-$120 when they first came out. Talk about bang for you buck? When I was a kid, my brother and I saved up our allowances for three month to buy the first Power Rangers game on the SNES, cost us $70 and we beat it in 4 hours. And you know what? We were freaking happy. You wanted a Mario game new? You had to pay around $80, unless it was brand new, then you were looking at $100+ (Super Mario RPG cost my parents $120 brand new for us as a christmas present). Buying used back then was the only way to go, and even then, you were stil paying upwards of $40 to $50 for the good games. Thats why rental stores were the real treat. $5 for a video game for 3 days was a treat.

The $50 standard was a blessing and helped the gaming industry get more players.
Then the increase to $60 hit, and suddenly everyone started btiching?! C'MON!!!

For what we get, $60 is a steal, plain and simple!
User avatar
Tinkerbells
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:22 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:40 pm

5 brand new games should not cost 300$.



but what if all 5 were TES games?

so 1 tes game = 100-200 hours of play = 500 to 1000 hours of content for 300 bucks, whereas a movie would give you around 60 hours of "fresh" content for 300 bucks (10 dollars a movie=30 movies @ 2 hours each)
User avatar
Add Me
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:21 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:36 pm

No. Just... no.
$60 is a fair price.
User avatar
Alan Whiston
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:07 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:24 am

How about a crap load of customization for mages.


Like? <_<
User avatar
Charlotte Henderson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:37 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:52 pm



likewise a precedent isn't a law

Yes it is. That's why its called precedent law.
User avatar
lisa nuttall
 
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:33 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:52 pm

5 brand new games should not cost 300$.

Why though? Why are they expensive, you get a potentially unlimited amount of entertainment out of them, why is $60 too much money to ask? As I said before, when was the last time $60 gave you one week (168 hours) worth of entertainment? Many people have put in more hours than that, I think $60 is a fair price for the amount of work that goes into it.
User avatar
Stephanie I
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:28 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:50 pm

Like? <_<

Combining multiple spells.
User avatar
Jennie Skeletons
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:21 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:32 pm

I would have paid much more for Skyrim ($100.00 bucks for a working game). But unfortunately I bought mine for the PS3 and it's flat out broken and unfinished. AND I despise the company now for how they have dealt with their Public Relations for the PS3 issues. Now...I will NEVER....seriously NEVER buy a Bethesda game brand new. They will never see another dime from me again (and I have bought every single one of their games brand new). I will buy used versions at GameStop from now on. This is not a rant. It's an honest fact.
User avatar
Rex Help
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:52 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:22 am

The $50 standard was a blessing and helped the gaming industry get more players.
Then the increase to $60 hit, and suddenly everyone started btiching?! C'MON!!!

For what we get, $60 is a steal, plain and simple!


I think more people are upset about $60 because if producers can get away with it, what's to stop them from continuing to raise prices?

And it's not even as if they have much on production costs to worry about anymore. Most sales are digital now, and the crap you get with a physical copy is a flimsy advertisemant card in place of a proper manual wrapped inside a cut down piece of thin plastic casing.
User avatar
evelina c
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:28 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:58 pm

Buying a ticket at the movies isn't comparable. At the movies you are at a venue using their services, big screen, seating and all. 6 friends may cost $60, but renting a DVD at red box for $1 is around 16 cents per friend. A game is on a disc which is not expensive to make. X# of sales on a cheap disc more the covers bethesda's development cost.

But this raises a point I meant to ask. How much of Skyrim is truly recycled? Are maps edited or made from scratch. The engine just seems edited. Same races and certain animals. How much is just ported from morrowind to oblivion to Skyrim? This isn't a complaint I'm just curious.
User avatar
Franko AlVarado
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:08 pm

Why though? Why are they expensive, you get a potentially unlimited amount of entertainment out of them, why is $60 too much money to ask? As I said before, when was the last time $60 gave you one week (168 hours) worth of entertainment? Many people have put in more hours than that, I think $60 is a fair price for the amount of work that goes into it.

Thats a damn good argument... $60 can only get you around 6-9 hours with movies, up to 18 hours with TV shows.
Video games offer so much more than that its not funny. Even the short ones find themselves lasting longer.
User avatar
adame
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:32 am

In this economy, no. Only for fallout!

Cheers
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:50 pm

Yes it is. That's why its called precedent law.


they are more rules and references used by courts than laws, to be changed and not strictly followed, you can have more than 1 precedent on an issue that might conflict with each other

legislative branches make laws, at least the familiar ones that must be followed in everyday life
User avatar
clelia vega
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:04 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:58 am

I will say that $60 buck for Skyrim has been a good deal. It certainly has consumed enough hours already and there is plenty more yet for me to do and see.

That said..... Skyrim was developed to be a $60 game. I would certainly pay $100-$200 for a game like Skyrim that didn't have most of the RPG elements cut out of it. If every NPC had the level of conversations that you might have had with a Dragon Age:Origins companion. If there enough quests and choices to join every faction in the game.... and by that I mean if I chose to get in good with the Forsworn and help them retake Markath, the game should allow me to do so in some way.

If they had quadrupled the effort, detail, and complexity of the game, I would EASILY pay several hundred dollars for a game like that.
User avatar
Krystina Proietti
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:02 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:39 am

they are more rules and references used by courts than laws, to be changed and not strictly followed, you can have more than 1 precedent on an issue that might conflict with each other

legislative branches make laws, at least the familiar ones that must be followed in everyday life

Executive branches and judicial branches do to. The president can issue an executive order. Supreme court can determine whether or not a law is constitutional.
User avatar
Natalie Taylor
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:54 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion