Would you pay more for the next TES?

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:39 pm

So I have been reading some threads asking for more content, quests, animals, bigger cities etc. and while Im certainly not opposed to getting more content for my buck I look at other games *cough* COD *cough* that can recycle basically the same game 3 or 4 years in a row without any major changes and they still break sales records and generally can match or beat sale for sale Beth releases, which IMO are in another level as far as fresh content and pushing the envelope are concerned

So logistics of keeping a price point good for the casual players aside, and assuming they would up the content and quality of content, would you pay more for TES 6?

Edit: A point I wanted to add but forgot, 1 ticket to the movies these days costs about 10 bucks for 2 hours of content, Skyrim on the other hand was 60 bucks for 100 hours+, just another thing to chew on, converse away!
User avatar
Gavin boyce
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:19 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:24 am

No, games are too expensive now as it is.
User avatar
joannARRGH
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:09 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:07 pm

I think the current price was fair. That being said TES games are a great value for your money. Many hours of gameplay and fun

:D
User avatar
patricia kris
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:48 pm

Depends on what the "Norm" for game pricing is. If it is still the same as now then no, if it was more expensive then yes, I would.
User avatar
Big Homie
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:31 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:06 am

I voted no. I'll pay 60$ for the game, and then if it is worth it, I will buy the DLC and expansions for it.
User avatar
Shelby McDonald
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:29 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:58 pm

If it was somewhat bug free, maybe.
User avatar
Jani Eayon
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:08 pm

In Finland new games cost roughly about 69,95€ if you go buy 'em from the local shop or something. By some currency converter 69€ = $94, so yeah, I think we're paying a fair price in here :rolleyes:
(Well tbh, many players buy their games online which drops the price quite nicely -- $57.)
User avatar
Eduardo Rosas
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:21 pm

You just got to know where to buy them. 1 € + three old games that I don't play anymore was my price for Skyrim. I also bought collectors edition Skyrim for 100-120€. (can't remember)

@Juuzto: A new game bought online drops the price to 43,44€. (ps3 and xbox360). You just got to know which stores to buy from.
User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:00 pm

I need to pay more than you guys for this game, because of those damn taxes... So no way i'll buy another TES game if it is more expensive..
User avatar
ImmaTakeYour
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:45 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:25 pm

Yes, games are cheep comparability speaking. If I am still playing games by the time it comes out, and I have whatever system is required, yes I'd pay more than $60, assuming I like what I see.
User avatar
Julie Serebrekoff
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:41 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:08 pm

I would gladly pay more if it means a quality game.
when the elder scrolls 6 comes out who is going to say they wont buy it for 70-80 bucks if they have been waiting over a year for
User avatar
Aliish Sheldonn
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:19 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:12 am

You have really high prizes on the poll opinions! And no, I'm not paying more for the next TES. I bought Skyrim with 35€ and it's quite a high prize for a PC game.
User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:28 pm

No, games are too expensive now as it is.

Really? 100s of hours of fun for only 60$. Games are cheap. I AT LEAST get 60 hours of fun, so that's 1$ an hour. It can cost me and three of my friends 60$ to go to the movies and see a hour and a half movie.
User avatar
Soku Nyorah
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:46 pm

who would't want to pay more for a game?
User avatar
kelly thomson
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:18 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:27 am

No game should be $60.
only reason they make it that price is because of DRM they waste money on.

No way I would pay more.
any game over $60 would be a "OH HECK NO I AIN'T PAYING THAT MUCH FOR A MODERN GAME!"
Cuz every modern game that comes out now-a-days comes out broken, or terrible.
User avatar
natalie mccormick
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:36 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:44 pm

Actually 40 Euro is acceptable price to pay for a game on steam. 49,99 Euro is expensive while 59,99 is unacceptable, I rather add another 10 Euro and purchase collectors/Steam special edition.
User avatar
Pumpkin
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:23 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:52 pm

I spend a LOT more money on recreational activities that I do not enjoy as much. I would have bought skyrim if it were $200 but I'm glad I didn't have to! Get to spend the rest of that money on alcohol! :celebration:

So skyrim will keep me entertained for probably a whole year, and I'll pick it up again a year after I put it down. - $60

One weeks worth of alcohol at a cheap bar - $100 at least
User avatar
Ross
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:22 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:32 am

For a PC version of the game with modding support, absolutely. I'd happily pay twice as much as I would for a normal game.
User avatar
Chris Ellis
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:00 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:37 am

Yes, games are cheep comparability speaking. If I am still playing games by the time it comes out, and I have whatever system is required, yes I'd pay more than $60, assuming I like what I see.

lol wut?
Games are CHEEP!?
Dude, do by any accident crap gold so you think games are cheep?
User avatar
Rozlyn Robinson
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:25 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:32 pm

No freakin' way. Still haven't bought Skyrim, waiting for the dlc to come out and get bundled. Once that edition is about $40 I'll buy it. Until then I can borrow a copy from a friend.
User avatar
Lauren Graves
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Actually 40 Euro is acceptable price to pay for a game on steam. 49,99 Euro is expensive while 59,99 is unacceptable, I rather add another 10 Euro and purchase collectors/Steam special edition.


AMERICA, F--- YEAH!, COMING AGAIN, TO SAVE THE MOTHER FU--ING DAY YEAH!

lol jk, I woulda put options for other currencies but I thought it might make it more confusing poll-wise

Cheers from Texas
User avatar
trisha punch
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:27 pm

No freakin' way. Still haven't bought Skyrim, waiting for the dlc to come out and get bundled. Once that edition is about $40 I'll buy it. Until then I can borrow a copy from a friend.


Just playing Devils Advocate some, you don't mind not buying a game your going to get way more content from than almost anything else? I bought OB 3 times (not for fun though, lost it twice :sadvaultboy: ) the moral though is I coulda got it from the Arrggh Bay but I always feel a responsibility to people that make quality games, so I buy from good devs and test other games I might buy through other, more free, means

Also for everyone else, why buy a game then an expansion pack a few months later instead of buying both at release? whats the difference?

DISCUSS!
User avatar
leni
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:58 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:30 pm

Actually, I stand with the crowd who believes that games should be divided between more price points - 20$, 40$, 60$, 80$, depending on size and quality. Skyrim would have been in the top tier. The problem is that every developer also believes their own game should be. You can bet that the moment some AAA titles start getting tagged at 80$, everyone is going to jump on the bandwagon, wether they deserve to or not.
User avatar
Neil
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:08 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:27 pm

If they have a "next" version... it should be completely FREE and DLC supported.

Start with ONE SINGLE TOWN... So people can see if it RUNS for them... So all those "manageable bugs" can be fixed ASAP... and it only expands where you want it to expand... Not 6GB of data downloaded all at once... 90% of which, you don't see until you have completed a majority of the game... (And from a programming perspective, using samller files that are easier and faster to load and extract data from, that can actually be defragged. Since large files are usually skipped, remaining fragmented, and limit searching speeds for the game itself.)

EG, Releasing "Whiterun" and the surrounding lands as the "Free" part. Then releasing neighboring land areas, as the "Pay content", Like $5 an area... With associated "extra content", available for each area loaded. (Eg, loading a new area also adds things to the original area, or replaces data in the "required lands", needed to load that extra land area. Replaces, as opposed to just adding to the original lands, since you will be leveling and growing with the land expansion. Perhaps also suppressing lands until appropriate levels are reached. So starting a new character would only load the original land, only loading the purchased other lands once you reached certain points in levels, or quests, even though you may have purchased $100 worth of upgrades. New characters would not be burdened by the modified world, which has grown to difficult levels. Also since the things which may have been replaced by the purchase, while playing a higher level character, would be most of the lower-level things, also known as low-level-clutter.)

Updates could also be managed by each DLC... Progressive like the DLC itself. (If the first free part played perfect as 1.7, but the next area needed patches to 1.9 which botched the original free-content... That upgrade would not load until the other DLC area was loaded...)

Think of it like this... You played Oblivion.... Now you buy the DLC Skyrim... Now the border opens-up to the north... and you can simply walk to Skyrim, from Oblivion. (Slight possible loading pause, but physically connected. Plus, conversations and quests would be added to Oblivion, directing you to Skyrim, as well as obvious quests in Skyrim, now directing you back to Oblivion... (The DLC should not be THAT LARGE... And if it is growing in layers/areas... the loading delays could be zero... since you only load two or four DLC areas at a time at a time.)

Sure, it would make a land as large as skyrim, cost nearly $400... but it would not be THIS BARRON, and this SPARSE... or this bugged. (You wold also not be forced to walk half way across the continent for a mission. Staying near each area, until directed to the other areas.

Heck, start it reverse... start us on the edges, and let us work our way to the "big city" from the "Small towns", watching the world grow with us... with our actions. Once reaching the big city, and high-leveled.. send os out into the dangerous wilderness with more DLC, expanding the land to fill-in the voids. (Voids being the dangerous places we avoided.. sticking ot the safe roads and zig-zagging through the continent, with DLC.)
User avatar
Lisha Boo
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:56 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:02 am

Actually, I stand with the crowd who believes that games should be divided between more price points - 20$, 40$, 60$, 80$, depending on size and quality. Skyrim would have been in the top tier. The problem is that every developer also believes their own game should be. You can bet that the moment some AAA titles start getting tagged at 80$, everyone is going to jump on the bandwagon, wether they deserve to or not.


This is a good point, but would more or just as many people stick with COD at 80$ as with TES:6 at 80$ or would they start shopping elsewhere for their FPS experience

there are tons of FPS's but TES has a pretty unique experience undoubtedly

@JD_mortal-not a bad concept, but what about any quests that interlock between cities and the MQ?
User avatar
Talitha Kukk
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:14 am

Next

Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion