Wouldn't there be places in the world that are untouched by

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:05 am

What if you live on a self-sustaning island nation?

i would say unless you built that self sustaining island nation, making it impossible for anyone to know about it, youds till get a wave of people fleeing the carnage on mainlands.. or the carnage would come to you, since youre the only self sustaining place left
User avatar
Roy Harris
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:58 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:18 am

That sounds like its relying on nuclear winter to reduce the Temperature.... ITRW IIRC thats a discredited theory... In Fallout's world, it didn't happen.


True on both counts, but still, something, be it fallout or dark skies, is gonna make food stocks scarce, and lead to raids on the areas that happened to survive the bombs.
User avatar
Lalla Vu
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:40 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:01 pm

True on both counts, but still, something, be it fallout or dark skies, is gonna make food stocks scarce, and lead to raids on the areas that happened to survive the bombs.

hows about the radiation killing off the plantlife (which in the FO universe means they dont grow back as fast as IRL) that would effect everything
User avatar
brian adkins
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:51 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:51 pm

What if you live on a self-sustaning island nation?

Well... No Man (or Self-Sustaining Island nation) is a (metaphorical) island... They would still need to import something, be it fuel, minerals, manufacturing items, medicines, even if the food is self sustainable.

Whilst the populace gets news of the world falling to bits outside this would undoubtedly effect civil order, fringe groups using the confusion to stage attacks on power, peace activists protesting the war, hawks protesting the lack of involvement in said conflict....
User avatar
Steph
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:44 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:00 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Southern_and_Antarctic_Lands, intriguing place, right smack in the middle of ocean.

(to be more precise, I am talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerguelen_Islands)
User avatar
Lakyn Ellery
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:02 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:44 pm

That sounds like its relying on nuclear winter to reduce the Temperature.... ITRW IIRC thats a discredited theory... In Fallout's world, it didn't happen.



True on both counts, but still, something, be it fallout or dark skies, is gonna make food stocks scarce, and lead to raids on the areas that happened to survive the bombs.


Nuclear Winter IS NOT Discredited. Carl Sagan's figures, yes, those are out the window. Observe:

Well, that's news to me.

I'll make a note of it...

*does some searching* You may want to look at this.

A study presented at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union in December 2006 found that even a small-scale, regional nuclear war could produce as many direct fatalities as all of World War II and disrupt the global climate for a decade or more. In a regional nuclear conflict scenario where two opposing nations in the subtropics would each use 50 Hiroshima-sized nuclear weapons (about 15 kiloton each) on major populated centres, the researchers estimated fatalities from 2.6 million to 16.7 million per country. Also, as much as five million tons of soot would be released, which would produce a cooling of several degrees over large areas of North America and Eurasia, including most of the grain-growing regions. The cooling would last for years and could be "catastrophic" according to the researchers.


This was pulled from Wikipedia. Furthermore, these were the citations used for that quote.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061211090729.htm
http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/nuclear/

Unless Sagan discredited it 2007 (about 11 years after he died) then Nuclear Winter- or at least a Nuclear Global Cooling- is still valid.

User avatar
Emilie Joseph
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:28 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:34 pm

One has to admit, the nuclear detonation rips open the sky like a scroll, pouring material into the stratosphere like krakatoa did which made year in which the world had no summer.

In the case of the massive volcanos, its SO2 in the high atmosphere changing the planetary albedo so we reflect more light into space, and yes, S02 is a pollutant produced by dirty industry. (Sulfuric Acid Rain whe it mixes with water in atmosphere).

Consider it all.

Most amazing is how ancient man could describe these weapons so well in writings 2 millenia and/or older.
User avatar
Krystina Proietti
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:02 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:45 pm

The war would reach everywhere by one simple mechanism - starvation.

What the war Would do is completely break-down the global trade system over-night, and many billions of people depend on food and other critical aid from over-seas countries. Industry would fail, and as such no one would be "making" food anymore on a large scale.

Most of those who survived the day of the war would then die of starvation and common diseases (by our standards) within the weeks to follow. What food was still around on trees would be covered in Fallout, so I think food is globally affected in any such war.

Miax
User avatar
Emerald Dreams
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:52 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:30 pm

Untouched by the war? Are you serious? The bombs have irradiated the world so badly that even ghouls and mutties are out.

Well, maybe some part of the world would not be as badly wasted as in the wasteland that we know... but they will all still be affected.
User avatar
Breautiful
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:44 am

Id still see some native guys in the pacific survivng :D
User avatar
Adrian Morales
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:19 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:41 pm

Id still see some native guys in the pacific survivng :D

Somewhere some Filipino fishing village is completely oblivious to the worldwide destruction that ravaged the world 200 years ago. At the same time some tribal hunters in the Amazon are wondering where the [censored] all these massive roaches, flies, and scorpions are coming from... and how they got so friggin lucky! YUM!!
User avatar
Micah Judaeah
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Untouched by the war? Are you serious? The bombs have irradiated the world so badly that even ghouls and mutties are out.

Well, maybe some part of the world would not be as badly wasted as in the wasteland that we know... but they will all still be affected.


Very correct here. Those thinking that there would be Pacific Island Oasis's from nuclear fallout are kidding themselves in the case of a full-scale nuclear war.

Those islanders would be no better off than anyone else, much worse in fact if the radiation kills alot of the surface fish in the ocean. I think food would be an even worse issue there.

No one gets to "hide" from a nuclear war.

Miax
User avatar
Silvia Gil
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:31 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:54 am

No one gets to "hide" from a nuclear war.

Miax

unless theyre in a vault-tec vault! ;)
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:18 pm

Antartica. Except wind patterns would choke it with fallout along with Australia.
User avatar
Manny(BAKE)
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:14 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:40 am

I'm sure there are some places that are doing fine after the apocalypse, but that wouldn't make a fun game if fallout was set there now would it? :P
User avatar
Jani Eayon
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:52 pm

I'm sure there are some places that are doing fine after the apocalypse, but that wouldn't make a fun game if fallout was set there now would it? :P


Not according to Fallout 1/Fallout 2 which clearly state that the world was engulfed in a grand scale nuclear war.
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:50 am

ah but what about tribes in deep jungles with no contact with the outside world?
User avatar
Joey Bel
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:44 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:26 am

There would be pockets of land not messed up or radiated. Just pockets.
User avatar
ImmaTakeYour
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:45 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:53 pm

even the most remote places would feel the effects through a changing weather system, which would change an eco system..
then theres that whole pesky food chain getting some links taken out and/or added.
you would also tghinkthat any rad free oasis has the potential to be flocked to by survivros, essentially making it a battleground or at the least depleating its resources.
global scale nuclear war is just that-global
User avatar
lolly13
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:36 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:07 pm

even the most remote places would feel the effects through a changing weather system, which would change an eco system..
then theres that whole pesky food chain getting some links taken out and/or added.
you would also tghinkthat any rad free oasis has the potential to be flocked to by survivros, essentially making it a battleground or at the least depleating its resources.
global scale nuclear war is just that-global

There's also the economic effects... lesser access to imported food which may result in starvation in some already marginal habitable areas, lesser access to the technology/materials to maintain the technology that are responsible for modern life (Electrics, Plumbing, etc), limited access to medicines and vaccines.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:00 pm

There's also the economic effects... lesser access to imported food which may result in starvation in some already marginal habitable areas, lesser access to the technology/materials to maintain the technology that are responsible for modern life (Electrics, Plumbing, etc), limited access to medicines and vaccines.

agreed (WOW!) hahah
User avatar
Kay O'Hara
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:04 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:27 am

New Zealand


Australia



LOLZ. OZ and Austrailia have several large US space tracking stations (For satelites, space missions, ect) Plus, if I recall from my days in the service, both nations serve as ports of call for many US military vessels.

Short version is: Both countries would have warheads paying them a visit.

(Forgive any spelling or grammar errors, got out of surgery yesterday and they have me taking Oxycodone for the pain.)
User avatar
Nicole Mark
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:33 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:00 am

LOLZ. OZ and Austrailia have several large US space tracking stations (For satelites, space missions, ect) Plus, if I recall from my days in the service, both nations serve as ports of call for many US military vessels.

Short version is: Both countries would have warheads paying them a visit.

(Forgive any spelling or grammar errors, got out of surgery yesterday and they have me taking Oxycodone for the pain.)

Assuming a similar treaty situation existed in the fallout world as in the real world, Australia would be compelled to join the war on the US side by way of the ANZUS treaty.

ANZUS was signed in 1951 (near the point of divergence), which increases the chance that it did exist at one point, if not at the point of war.

Until 1984 the treaty also would have compelled NZ to come to the defence of the US as well. As this change was definately "post Divergence", it could well mean that NZ would have been compelled to act too.

Australia, NZ and the US are also signatories to the UK-USA security agreement which gives us the ECHELON signals interception which is designed to intercept as many satelite transmitted communications as possible. Although Echelon dates from the 60's (Post divergence), it is an extention of previous treaties signed in the 40's, meaning in fallout's world Australia and New Zealand could have played a very important role in the US's intelligence gathering network, making them targets.
User avatar
Ria dell
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:03 pm

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:35 am

all of north america would be destroyed, not just U.S. [note]
User avatar
lauren cleaves
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:35 am

Post » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:05 pm

To add on this, the Pitt wasn't nuked but the people are so mutated because of irratiated rivers and pollution. South Africa might be a target in an all-out destruction war for example, and this would irradiate half the rivers in Africa, even if nobody thought to nuke them they would (according to fallout Science!) have mutations as well.
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion