Xbox Live arcade fallout 1 and 2

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:04 am

xbox took the nintendo 64 game banjo kazooie and made it an arcade game so im wondering if this would be possible for the first two fallouts
i started on fallout3 and think it would open up some of the story line if i were to play the first two
User avatar
Brandon Wilson
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:31 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:13 am

Use that PC you're on to play them.
User avatar
sam smith
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:55 am

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 11:02 pm

Use that PC you're on to play them.


This. Believe it or not, you don't need a top of the line PC to play the first two Fallout games, and you can get them for a relatively low price ($5.99) at Good Old Games.
User avatar
John N
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:11 pm

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 11:11 pm

Besides, it would be up to Interplay to do something like this.

Bethesda has the rights to the franchise, but Interplay still controls distribution of the originals.
User avatar
Kay O'Hara
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:04 pm

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 8:57 pm

Despite me having a PC one million times better than needed to run the games, I agree it would be awesome to have them on Xbox Arcade or Playstation Network, so let's ease up on him about that.

The truth is that it is very possible... see Monkey Island or Sam and Max, a mouse pointer controled game works fine on Xbox and they should be quick ports, mostly. That said, since it is Interplay we are dealing with, it is unlikely to happen. They have no money, and while the port would be somewhat easy, it would still require testing, Microsoft certification, some basic development and graphical artistry... in the end, despite being somewhat a cheap thing to do, I doubt Interplay can spare the resources.

I would say we would be better off with Bethesda at the helm, but since they have shown no interest in rereleasing their older Elder Scrolls games, and have in fact instead just given them away on PC for free, I don't think they would do anything different with Fallout.

You never know though... keep talking about it and letting the companies know there is a market for it. Now that PC genres and series are on consoles there is probably a lot of people who would enjoy playing the older games they never got on their Super Nintendo... Half-Life, Baldurs Gate, Daggerfall, Fallout... I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often. The original PC-only Call of Duty is coming to Xbox Arcade soon... maybe that will set a precedent.
User avatar
Dominic Vaughan
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 pm

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 7:58 pm

well the pc versions of the first two games are going to get harder and harder to acquire and plus it would be much easier to jus download it right onto your xbox with microsoft points than to have to go ebay hunting for it
User avatar
Big mike
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:38 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:15 am

well the pc versions of the first two games are going to get harder and harder to acquire and plus it would be much easier to jus download it right onto your xbox with microsoft points than to have to go ebay hunting for it


You can get them on GOG.com... $5.99 a piece, and downloadable forever.
User avatar
Bonnie Clyde
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:02 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:06 am

And up to just recently the Fallout Trilogy recently put out by Interplay was in the top 10 bestseller list.
User avatar
Far'ed K.G.h.m
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:03 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:08 pm

This will NEVER happen besides the originals are cheap and have relitivly low requariments for an average computer.
User avatar
Rob Smith
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:41 am

This will NEVER happen besides the originals are cheap and have relitivly low requariments for an average computer.


With the PSN getting an HD remake of Digger, anything is possible.
User avatar
Jack
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:08 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:26 am

Well, Top-Down RPGs don't lend themselves too well to anything but Portable consoles and PCs. There isn't enough buttons on the 360 controller for ADOM or NetHack (unless you have that little mini keyboard), same for FallOut 1 and 2.
User avatar
Cesar Gomez
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:06 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:18 am

I just got the Fallout Trilogy I ordered from Amazon today. Cheap, fun, and runs well :tops: .
User avatar
x a million...
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:59 pm

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 9:37 pm

I honestly can't picture Fallout 1 & 2's controls translating well on a gamepad.
User avatar
ruCkii
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:08 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:43 am

Well, Top-Down RPGs don't lend themselves too well to anything but Portable consoles and PCs. There isn't enough buttons on the 360 controller for ADOM or NetHack (unless you have that little mini keyboard), same for FallOut 1 and 2.

I don't see why...

You can play all of Fallout 1 and 2 perfectly fine with nothing but your mouse. There are a whopping three buttons on a mouse (counting the scroll wheel.) There's how many buttons on a modern-day console controller? :)

EDIT - This is off the top of my head for a button layout - it took me more time to write this than it did to think of it:
  • A Button - Left Click
  • B Button - Right Click
  • X Button - Swap Weapons
  • Y Button - Leave/ Enter Combat
  • Left Thumbstick - Move cursor
  • L3 - Doubles as Left Click
  • Right Thumbstick - Scroll the map
  • R3 - Bring up right-click menu (or possibly SkillDex)
  • Back - Pip-Boy Menu
  • Start - Game Menu
  • L1 and R1 - Cycle through hotpots on the menu
  • L2 - ?
  • R2 - ?
  • D-pad - Left and Right cycle through attacks modes, Up swaps your weapons, Down cycles aiming on and off.

All those buttons other than A and B are just extras anyway - like I said, you could play Fallout 1 and 2 just fine using only a mouse. But there's more than enough buttons on there to provide all the necessary shortcuts anyway, just to make navigating the game a bit quicker.

And frak, I'm on the side that still says it's never going to happen, I just don't think it's worth their time. (Besides, I still own my original copies - I'm not going to buy a game twice just because they put it out on XBox Live.) But certainly it could be done.
User avatar
Travis
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:14 am

well the pc versions of the first two games are going to get harder and harder to acquire and plus it would be much easier to jus download it right onto your xbox with microsoft points than to have to go ebay hunting for it


See, this is where your problem is.
User avatar
Elizabeth Falvey
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:37 am

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 11:49 pm

From a business perspective you think Interplay would at least try to do it seeing as how it would sell half decent based on Fallout 3 alone.
User avatar
Niisha
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:26 am

From a business perspective you think Interplay would at least try to do it seeing as how it would sell half decent based on Fallout 3 alone.


Interplay arent allowed to release as much as a patch, unless Bethesda OK's it.

Interplay's current FO1/2/Tactics rights are just to sell, not to modify.
User avatar
Strawberry
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:08 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:04 am

Well that svcks.
User avatar
Oscar Vazquez
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:44 am

Besides, it does seem like they're selling pretty well on PC. (I'm not sure, but it seems like even GOG downloads and such probably see a bit of that money going to Interplay.) This is probably more income than they've seen in some time. They'd probably be able to sell a bit more if it were available on XBL, but even if they were allowed to do so - there's also the question about how much it would cost them to port it out; and if the extra sales would really be enough to warrant that expenditure.

I mean, these days if you can get online to post on a forum about a XBL release of Fallout 1 and 2, then it probably means you have acess to a computer that would run those games well enough. I played those games back in the day on a Texas Instrument laptop. It wasn't much more than a glorified calculator/ word processor. I still have it around and it can't even process half the sites on the internet these days - but it ran Fallout 1 and 2 decently enough - if very slowly (and the refresh rate was so slow that all I could effectively play on it were turn-based games, because the ghosting was so bad.) :)
User avatar
Kevin Jay
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:29 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:24 am

i think it would be cool but i am buying them for pc
User avatar
GabiiE Liiziiouz
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:01 pm

(I'm not sure, but it seems like even GOG downloads and such probably see a bit of that money going to Interplay.)


Of course they do. Why else would they license them out to GOG?
User avatar
Lil Miss
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:57 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:32 am

Of course they do. Why else would they license them out to GOG?

Well, that's what I figured, but I don't have a very good head for business. :)

My guess is this is probably more income than Interplay's been able to generate in some time. (Again, though - I wouldn't really know...)
User avatar
Philip Lyon
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:08 am

Post » Mon May 31, 2010 10:23 pm

Besides, it does seem like they're selling pretty well on PC. (I'm not sure, but it seems like even GOG downloads and such probably see a bit of that money going to Interplay.) This is probably more income than they've seen in some time. They'd probably be able to sell a bit more if it were available on XBL, but even if they were allowed to do so - there's also the question about how much it would cost them to port it out; and if the extra sales would really be enough to warrant that expenditure.

I mean, these days if you can get online to post on a forum about a XBL release of Fallout 1 and 2, then it probably means you have acess to a computer that would run those games well enough. I played those games back in the day on a Texas Instrument laptop. It wasn't much more than a glorified calculator/ word processor. I still have it around and it can't even process half the sites on the internet these days - but it ran Fallout 1 and 2 decently enough - if very slowly (and the refresh rate was so slow that all I could effectively play on it were turn-based games, because the ghosting was so bad.) :)


Thing is, a lot of console gamers just REFUSE to game on a PC, even a 10 year old game that would run well on a cheap laptop. PCs just don't equal gaming for a TON of console gamers, and thus I think Fallout and Fallout 2 would sell well on Xbox, if for no other reason than 5 million Fallout 3 fans wanting to see what they were like.

I agree it will almost certainly never happen, I'm just speaking in generals.
User avatar
jaideep singh
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:45 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:23 am

Thing is, a lot of console gamers just REFUSE to game on a PC, even a 10 year old game that would run well on a cheap laptop. PCs just don't equal gaming for a TON of console gamers, and thus I think Fallout and Fallout 2 would sell well on Xbox, if for no other reason than 5 million Fallout 3 fans wanting to see what they were like.

I agree it will almost certainly never happen, I'm just speaking in generals.


That would be ignorance, the PC has been a gaming platform since the Commodore 64 days. I can understand console gamers preferring to play on a console, that's a fair stance, but refusing to play a game on the PC no matter what is extremely narrow minded and I don't think those folks should be rewarded for thinking as such. Guys like that are the same as PC Elitists, except they're on the opposite side of the spectrum.

If there's a console game I want to play bad enough, I'll buy the console if there's other decent looking titles on it. A PC (one that can run Fallout especially) is a household commodity these days, most folks have one. It's not that hard to get your hands on the classic Fallout titles; there's two different websites to purchase and digitally download them, and they've been re-released into retail stores.
User avatar
Benji
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:58 pm

Post » Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:40 am

That would be ignorance, the PC has been a gaming platform since the Commodore 64 days. I can understand console gamers preferring to play on a console, that's a fair stance, but refusing to play a game on the PC no matter what is extremely narrow minded and I don't think those folks should be rewarded for thinking as such. Guys like that are the same as PC Elitists, except they're on the opposite side of the spectrum.


For a loooong time, and still today in a lot of respects, PC gaming and console gaming are two different cultures. The games were so different in style, tone and gameplay before the Xbox that it made a lot of sense for people to be one or the other. I know I personally never played a console until the Xbox came out.

Now that the platforms have merged quite a bit, it makes sense for older PC games to be released on consoles for console-only games to experience them.
User avatar
maria Dwyer
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:24 am

Next

Return to Fallout Series Discussion