xkcd Wikipedia trick

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:58 pm

A recent edition of xkcd, my favorite webcomic, had a caption that said "Wikipedia triva: If you take any article, click on the first link in the article text not in parentheses or italics, and then repeat, you will eventually end up at 'Philosophy.'"

I decided to put this to the test, and it worked! After clicking on 'random article', here is my journey.

Simone Michel-Lévy
French Resistance
Resistance movement
Invasion
Offensive (military)
Military strategy
Military organization
State (polity)
Social sciences
List of academic disciplines
Academia
Community
Interaction
Causality
Event
Observable
Physics
Natural science
Science
Knowledge
Fact
Information
Sequence
Mathematics
Quantity
Property (philosophy)
Modern philosophy
Philosophy

Any comments, anyone else want to give it a try?
User avatar
lolli
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:42 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:00 am

Hitchikers Guide does it in about ten. :P
User avatar
John N
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:11 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:31 am

A recent edition of xkcd, my favorite webcomic, had a caption that said "Wikipedia triva: If you take any article, click on the first link in the article text not in parentheses or italics, and then repeat, you will eventually end up at 'Philosophy.'"

I've tried it a couple times and it always worked. If you actually start the procedure from the Philosophy article you end up looping back to it.
User avatar
Melissa De Thomasis
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:52 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:40 pm

Amusingly, once you get to philosophy, you end up in a loop where you end up back at philosophy after a couple clicks. Wonder how he found that out?

EDIT: ninja'd :ninja:
User avatar
Lisha Boo
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:56 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:06 am

Valkyria Chronicles
Tactical role-playing game
Video game
Electronic game
Game
Play (activity)
Ethology
Zoology
Biology
Natural science

And from then on, it's the same as your list. So maybe it's not Philosophy, but Science, or Knowledge, or Fact?

Note: This trick doesn't always work, either. A lot of the time articles are worded in such ways that you end up in a loop. I don't remember exactly, but a year or two ago I tried doing this (click first link of every article; I was bored) and ending up in a loop.
User avatar
Betsy Humpledink
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:56 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:23 am

Tenth Island
Nature reserve
Protected area
Ecology
Science
Knowledge
Fact
Information
Sequence
Mathematics
Quantity
Property (philosophy)
Modern philosophy
Philosophy


It seems once you hit Science, you will go to Philosophy.
User avatar
Devin Sluis
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:01 pm

This isn't an XKCD trick, I heard about it at the end of last year...
User avatar
FoReVeR_Me_N
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:25 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:27 pm

A recent edition of xkcd, my favorite webcomic, had a caption that said "Wikipedia triva: If you take any article, click on the first link in the article text not in parentheses or italics, and then repeat, you will eventually end up at 'Philosophy.'"

I decided to put this to the test, and it worked! After clicking on 'random article', here is my journey.

Simone Michel-Lévy
French Resistance
Resistance movement
Invasion
Offensive (military)
Military strategy
Military organization
State (polity)
Social sciences
List of academic disciplines
Academia
Community
Interaction
Causality
Event
Observable
Physics
Natural science
Science
Knowledge
Fact
Information
Sequence
Mathematics
Quantity
Property (philosophy)
Modern philosophy
Philosophy

Any comments, anyone else want to give it a try?


I read that strip, but thought it was just a joke, not really possible. Going to try it out right now.
User avatar
Sam Parker
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:52 am

I was attempting it with my sister sitting next to me on the couch and ended up at bdsn. That wasn't awkward at all.
User avatar
Chenae Butler
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:54 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:04 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics

:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:
User avatar
vicki kitterman
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:31 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics

:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:

:banghead:


...


:cookie:
User avatar
brian adkins
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:51 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:44 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics

:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:


"Middle English" is the first link that is not in parenthesis or italics ;)
User avatar
Amy Gibson
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:35 pm

And from then on, it's the same as your list. So maybe it's not Philosophy, but Science, or Knowledge, or Fact?

Well, from a mathematical viewpoint it's all of those. What's at issue here is the described process of getting from one Wikipedia article to the next, namely by clicking the first link in the article text which is not in parentheses or italics. Mathematically speaking, this can be called a function which acts on a set of all Wikipedia articles and maps on a (sub)set of all Wikipedia articles. As I've already said, clearly there is a cycle which at the moment of writing this post is:

  • Philosophy
  • Existence
  • Sense
  • Physiology
  • Science
  • Knowledge
  • Fact
  • Information
  • Sequence
  • Set (mathematics)
  • Mathematics
  • Quantity
  • Property (philosophy)
  • Modern philosophy
  • Philosophy

Therefore, saying that repeating the process will lead you to Philosophy is equivalent to saying that it will lead you to Mathematics, or Fact, or Science, or Knowledge, or any of the articles from this cycle. Of course, once you realise this, this finding is not so mysterious or interesting at all, because at least to me it seems pretty obvious that clicking the first link in articles will in nearly all cases eventually lead you to one of the articles from the above cycle, thereafter leading you to Philosophy as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics

:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:

Actually, there is, you just have to follow the same rule.

  • Game Mechanics
  • rule (@ Wiktionary)
  • Middle English
  • History of the English language
  • English language
  • West Germanic languages
  • Germanic languages
  • Indo-European languages
  • Language family
  • Language
  • Human
  • Extant taxon
  • Biology
  • Natural science
  • Science

And thus we've ended up within the above mentioned cycle.
User avatar
Guy Pearce
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 3:08 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:23 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics

:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:

Sorry but XKCD omitted the other rules, mainly the one that says only click Wikipedia links.

:evil:
User avatar
Tarka
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:22 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:29 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics

:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:

I got to Philosophy in about 30 from that...
User avatar
Nicole Mark
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:33 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:50 am

Toy Story
Randy Newman
Disney
Online Media
Numerical bases
Decimal
Vulgar fractions
Solidus
ISO
International standard
Standardization
De facto standard
QWERTY
Typewriters
Machine
Energy
Physics
Natural science
Naturalism (philosophy)

Huh, it works.
User avatar
Stacyia
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:48 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:42 pm

Natural science
Naturalism (philosophy)

The first link in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_science which is not within parentheses or in italics is to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science.

Also, finding an example for which it works doesn't prove that it always works. DEFRON has already almost broken it.
User avatar
Rachael
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:10 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:24 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics

Which came from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_mark.
User avatar
evelina c
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:28 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:20 pm

Sorry but XKCD omitted the other rules, mainly the one that says only click Wikipedia links.

:evil:

Fine, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_Aftermath

If you dislike that one, I can always find more dead-end articles.
User avatar
Ria dell
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:03 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:07 pm

It's whenever you hit any sort of mathematics or sciences that the actual sequence starts.
User avatar
Elisabete Gaspar
 
Posts: 3558
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:15 pm

Post » Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:39 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics

Which came from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_mark.

Nice. Which, unless there is an article which links to itself, is the smallest cycle.


Fine, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_Aftermath

If you dislike that one, I can always find more dead-end articles.

Sorry Deffers, you've been beaten. Also, the above example is much better because the article you linked to will probably be deleted soon.
User avatar
Pants
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:55 pm

I was attempting it with my sister sitting next to me on the couch and ended up at bdsn. That wasn't awkward at all.

Depends on how old your sister is...
User avatar
Schel[Anne]FTL
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:48 pm

Nice. Which, unless there is an article which links to itself, is the smallest cycle.



Sorry Deffers, you've been beaten. Also, the above example is much better because the article you linked to will probably be deleted soon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalyani_Nair, that said, the above one is indeed more elegant.
User avatar
Sara Lee
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:40 pm

Post » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:49 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalyani_Nair, that said, the above one is indeed more elegant.

And like I said, you've been beaten. You can find thousands of dead-end articles, but you'll never be the first one to have broken it in this thread. :P
User avatar
krystal sowten
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:10 am

And like I said, you've been beaten. You can find thousands of dead-end articles, but you'll never be the first one to have broken it in this thread. :P

Silver's way cooler than gold anyway :P
User avatar
Lillian Cawfield
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:22 pm

Next

Return to Othor Games