And from then on, it's the same as your list. So maybe it's not Philosophy, but Science, or Knowledge, or Fact?
Well, from a mathematical viewpoint it's all of those. What's at issue here is the described process of getting from one Wikipedia article to the next, namely by clicking the first link in the article text which is not in parentheses or italics. Mathematically speaking, this can be called a function which acts on a set of all Wikipedia articles and maps on a (sub)set of all Wikipedia articles. As I've already said, clearly there is a cycle which at the moment of writing this post is:
- Philosophy
- Existence
- Sense
- Physiology
- Science
- Knowledge
- Fact
- Information
- Sequence
- Set (mathematics)
- Mathematics
- Quantity
- Property (philosophy)
- Modern philosophy
- Philosophy
Therefore, saying that repeating the process will lead you to Philosophy is equivalent to saying that it will lead you to Mathematics, or Fact, or Science, or Knowledge, or any of the articles from this cycle. Of course, once you realise this, this finding is not so mysterious or interesting at all, because at least to me it seems pretty obvious that clicking the first link in articles will in nearly all cases eventually lead you to one of the articles from the above cycle, thereafter leading you to Philosophy as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics
:whisper: it takes you to wiktionary, from which there is no escape :whisper:
Actually, there is, you just have to follow the same rule.
- Game Mechanics
- rule (@ Wiktionary)
- Middle English
- History of the English language
- English language
- West Germanic languages
- Germanic languages
- Indo-European languages
- Language family
- Language
- Human
- Extant taxon
- Biology
- Natural science
- Science
And thus we've ended up within the above mentioned cycle.